From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 19:51:02 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E6791065670 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 19:51:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout026.mac.com (asmtpout026.mac.com [17.148.16.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86C538FC0C for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 19:51:02 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from cswiger1.apple.com ([17.209.4.71]) by asmtp026.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LOY002ARHT12S20@asmtp026.mac.com> for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 12:51:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.4.6813,1.0.211,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-07-26_06:2011-07-26, 2011-07-26, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1107260180 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: <20110726204737.534ab5f5@raksha.tavi.co.uk> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 12:51:01 -0700 Message-id: <2C5239B1-6D06-4CAE-B3F1-6E288247DBD0@mac.com> References: <20110726204737.534ab5f5@raksha.tavi.co.uk> To: Bob Eager X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which to bump for distfile location change? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 19:51:02 -0000 On Jul 26, 2011, at 12:47 PM, Bob Eager wrote: > Following a recent post to this list, I need to update a port, just to > change a distfile location. > > It seems excessive to bump PORTREVISION, so what is the best thing to > change (if any). Probably nothing-- if someone already has a copy of the distfile, and there are no other changes, then there is no need to force them to rebuild the port by bumping PORTREVISION. Regards, -- -Chuck