From owner-freebsd-ports  Fri Oct 17 01:48:40 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id BAA29912
          for ports-outgoing; Fri, 17 Oct 1997 01:48:40 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports)
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (wck-ca6-19.ix.netcom.com [199.35.213.211])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA29907
          for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 17 Oct 1997 01:48:36 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.7/8.6.9) id BAA04617; Fri, 17 Oct 1997 01:48:28 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 1997 01:48:28 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199710170848.BAA04617@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: taguchi@tohoku.iij.ad.jp
CC: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <19971017151842H.taguchi@hirose.tohoku.iij.ad.jp> (message from Taguchi Takeshi on Fri, 17 Oct 1997 15:18:42 +0900)
Subject: Re: ports/4786
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * I found such probrems 2 hours ago, and Just now, I sent new
 * patch here.
 * 
 * would you like to commit it again?

Err.  No, not really.  (I need to build all the packages.)  But if
it's really critical, please send it as a diff to what is in -current
right now.

(And no patch-editing after testing this time, please.... ;)

Satoshi