From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 20 04:26:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E35816A41F for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 04:26:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from speedfactory.net (mail6.speedfactory.net [66.23.216.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86A1A43D49 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 04:26:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from server.baldwin.cx (unverified [66.23.211.162]) by speedfactory.net (SurgeMail 3.5b3) with ESMTP id 4177561 for multiple; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 23:24:26 -0500 Received: from zion.baldwin.cx (zion.baldwin.cx [192.168.0.7]) (authenticated bits=0) by server.baldwin.cx (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBK4QGxU002230; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 23:26:16 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 23:24:16 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <200512192117.jBJLHE8C057230@lurza.secnetix.de> <200512191513.51287.fcash@ocis.net> In-Reply-To: <200512191513.51287.fcash@ocis.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512192324.17294.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.87.1, clamav-milter version 0.87 on server.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=4.2 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on server.baldwin.cx X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com r=1653887525 Cc: Freddie Cash Subject: Re: DRM update for testing X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 04:26:21 -0000 On Monday 19 December 2005 06:13 pm, Freddie Cash wrote: > On December 19, 2005 01:17 pm, Oliver Fromme wrote: > > Freddie Cash wrote: > > > Running glxgears at 1024x768x16 gives me a decent 35 fps, compared > > > to the 1 fps I used to get. :) > > > > Uhm. Are you sure that you're running hardware-accelerated > > OpenGL glxgears? > > > > I get 48 fps at 1400x1050x32 -- in software, without any > > hardware 3D acceleration. (It's a 1.6GHz Centrino notebook > > with shared i915 graphics. 2D acceleration is enabled, of > > course.) > > Yep. It's a bog-slow laptop (2.8 GHz Celeron CPU, 1 GB RAM, 40 GB HD > running at ATA33 instead of ATA100, Radeon 7000 GPU). It may be a 2.8 > GHz CPU, but it runs like a a 1 GHz, even in Debian Linux. > > Without DRM/DRI enabled in X, glxgears give single-digit framerates. With > DRM/DRI enabled in X, glxgears gives double-digit to triple-digit > framerates (depending on window size). The glxgears info also shows the > hardware accel enabled and disabled correctly. > > Running Debian Linux unstable on the same laptop showed slightly better > framerates in glxgears (~50 fps fullscreen vs. ~30 in FreeBSD), but the > harddrive was also running at ATA100 (not that that should affect > glxgears all that much). These numbers all sound weird to me. I get 300 fps on an ancient Matrox G2= 00=20 on a system with a 700Mhz Athlon. At work we typically get around 1600 fps= =20 in glxgears with Radeon 8500's on systems with 865 chipsets and 2.4 - 2.8 g= hz=20 P4s. Sub-100 fps for glxgears seems slow even for software rendering. =2D-=20 John Baldwin =C2=A0<>< =C2=A0http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" =C2=A0=3D =C2=A0http://www.FreeBSD.org