From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Wed Sep 11 14:31:33 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A6ACD5F13 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 14:31:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markjdb@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io1-xd36.google.com (mail-io1-xd36.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d36]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46T48h27Dqz41MN for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 14:31:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markjdb@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io1-xd36.google.com with SMTP id r4so46266452iop.4 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 07:31:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=HY78RraKo+uBYn5dUskyEQdRVQaBrexZduCSjVPl7Pk=; b=EVH9196pfG6gN81SzWOYMNV2fpjfxOWVcizKAhad+tAl/tnnfMkHf6ARdj8rNjt6GZ q/ixw9o7wfZY8me8m/aF5PeFxkJm7Qhjh2D3WuUInkqzoDeGKgltI6bYF+rklk9DWkiW qTOFKJntN1zlOXr3dYWqTSgpTo8yqkcLrl86AANKvanpTOfxjaBleuS0s+k6TVBvUiFX ojVpEtbQztjfUOMidE4TZwzkymWPYETykHGafTPJ0EiXgf8Rz9cAyq6O3LEOeIw9+6RA pDFisGrsj4iWneZCLX5OBR4h7h/gmtJDiUbaRsWe+2FyeAL9BB8gg1/aprSRuly52KFo TIrw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=HY78RraKo+uBYn5dUskyEQdRVQaBrexZduCSjVPl7Pk=; b=dFpE4xWJon6cvQVXHS/EXsKbFVFQ759nN+tlIrbXvuy/QqBr/yPh4VFgtoHu/6wjjY oFiQjahnw5XCn7umjMxhLZGVk8vliRr5xY5WaMAiaVmWWQlVt2ELVX60Wm2xaKk7Jpya quix5SWvGXYmtLhC66xXwjwHc5WmOKGwYh8gCnXKieNlHHofavu6652Vi8BTCWE4Sqwb oRQE7hyVUkjSxedOVNbEN0hlGcvyRvrLU9GyHp+aWmeZcFpZguJFE10uuDFn6NctHMe6 JfiLygdkh3rlqWH2fz4nQ7IuQddtpLDEjsgjC6BgTJi99t5nJfKCZ6lDuS7doCiM98tT bThg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUkhgZRTb5Ntfj/OJNzDJGFfK/QOi8Tl8l/9oY/cYAwfrEbdKhN XFtVIb28CtD4eDC/wMm4uEA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwRPFDKIRNDh8Ej3i3HFEnN1QnzympQ6jjcObqHecAeLwjWEumxq64UVwGj0IUCTScKCbahVA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:928:: with SMTP id 8mr37214168jak.124.1568212290972; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 07:31:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from raichu (toroon0560w-lp140-01-69-159-39-167.dsl.bell.ca. [69.159.39.167]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c4sm16575099ioa.76.2019.09.11.07.31.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 11 Sep 2019 07:31:30 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Mark Johnston Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 10:31:25 -0400 From: Mark Johnston To: Mark Millard Cc: FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: "cpuset -n prefer:?" --what values for "?" are supposed to be allowed? (only 1 is, despite two numa domains) Message-ID: <20190911143125.GA17992@raichu> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46T48h27Dqz41MN X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=EVH9196p; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of markjdb@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::d36 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=markjdb@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.80 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[markj@freebsd.org,markjdb@gmail.com]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[yahoo.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; IP_SCORE(-2.10)[ip: (-5.45), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.72), asn: 15169(-2.25), country: US(-0.05)]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[markj@freebsd.org,markjdb@gmail.com]; SUBJECT_HAS_QUESTION(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[6.3.d.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 14:31:33 -0000 On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 10:58:05PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > In a context with: > > # cpuset -g > pid -1 mask: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 > pid -1 domain policy: first-touch mask: 0, 1 > > I get: > > # cpuset -l0 -n prefer:0 COMMAND > cpuset: setdomain: Invalid argument > > # cpuset -l0 -n prefer:2 COMMAND > cpuset: setdomain: Invalid argument > > But one prefer:? value does allow the COMMAND > to run: > > # cpuset -l0 -n prefer:1 COMMAND > > This seem odd to me. Am I missing something? > > For reference: I'm using a ThreadRipper 1950X > with a head -r351227 based context for this > activity. The above happens to have been run > in a Windows 10 Pro HyperV session, instead > of in a native-boot of the same media. (A > native-boot would have had 32 CPUs.) Can you please show the output of "sysctl vm.phys_segs" from this setup?