Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 15:16:11 +0200 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> To: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: execvpe port breakage Message-ID: <485CFF1B.2080500@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <485B884A.70006@freebsd.org> References: <485B7FFC.4040509@FreeBSD.org> <485B884A.70006@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David Xu wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: >> http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.8.2008062001/deco-3.9_3.log >> >> >> Can someone please take a look? >> >> Kris >> > > Looks like the application defined its own version of execvpe() ? > I think we should change name execvpe in our header file to something > else to avoid conflict. > > David Xu > > There are a few others too: ./deco-3.9_3.log ./gdc-0.24_3.log ./ghc-6.8.2_1.log ./hugs98-200609_2.log ./jdk-1.6.0.3p4_2.log Also sysutils/screen. We could either patch these, try to alter the prototype of our execvpe to match, or rename/hide our version. I don't know if there is a standards-based argument. Kris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?485CFF1B.2080500>