Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 11:29:36 +0200 (CEST) From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: bde@zeta.org.au Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: libkern/quad.h Message-ID: <200204100929.g3A9TaHA000682@Magelan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <20020410191448.V7317-100000@gamplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10 Apr, Bruce Evans wrote:
>> * XXX
>> * Compensate for gcc 1 vs gcc 2. Gcc 1 defines ?sh?di3's second argument
>> * as u_quad_t, while gcc 2 correctly uses int. Unfortunately, we still use
>> * both compilers.
>> Is this still valid? Does someone really use gcc 1 to compile FreeBSD?
>
> This became invalid before FreeBSD-2.0 was released.
>
> Most special cases to support gcc's before approx 2.7 are now bogus.
> Unlike the above, most of them are just for optimizations or for better
> diagnostics, so removing them shouldn't break compiling with old versions
> of gcc any more than not having the for other C compilers breaks compiling
> with other C compilers.
Thank you, I will remove them in my icc patches.
Bye,
Alexander.
--
Secret hacker rule #11: hackers read manuals.
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net
GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200204100929.g3A9TaHA000682>