From owner-freebsd-chat Thu Jul 15 12:15:39 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from shell.webmaster.com (mail.webmaster.com [209.133.28.73]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DAC4155D8 for ; Thu, 15 Jul 1999 12:15:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from davids@webmaster.com) Received: from whenever ([209.133.29.2]) by shell.webmaster.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-12345L500S10000V35) with SMTP id com; Thu, 15 Jul 1999 12:15:32 -0700 From: "David Schwartz" To: "David Schwartz" , "Tani Hosokawa" Cc: , Subject: RE: Known MMAP() race conditions ... ? Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 12:15:32 -0700 Message-ID: <000001becef6$6853c670$021d85d1@youwant.to> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 In-Reply-To: <000101becef4$966499b0$021d85d1@youwant.to> Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > It's one-process-per-request model is atrocious. Let me retract this statement, because it's not really fair. Apache has done an amazing job of getting very good performance on a wide variety of platforms. The one-process-per-request model does create problems, but they're usually in special cases, like when you're using lots of perl CGIs and mod_perl. But if you're going to change it, and lose that, you should change it in favor of a clearly better model. And I'm not sure one-thread-per-request is clearly better. DS To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message