From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 3 10:39:29 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2D0D219 for ; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 10:39:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-qe0-x22b.google.com (mail-qe0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c02::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 828922849 for ; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 10:39:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qe0-f43.google.com with SMTP id nc12so3556464qeb.30 for ; Sun, 03 Nov 2013 02:39:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=bCc4QLjBW3oXw8PtUJJSr3niBaSgxBtqcpPxORiFY04=; b=b7JRlq2CFUpYCvSoG38WP1vZDG0BNqSQF1KQ0s8W/ca+IHr81kEXtJxFgrV6MRwFLy 4i0mt/YjHcaXEuDV4S+qEXGDpe8v20tgEGDBfsDEO6kfUArElTk6rGANKvPM0vGInA8p Iv+ZJPnEW6BgDK36Vb+b7nLVDxPmVIDthRsPE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:reply-to:organization:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=bCc4QLjBW3oXw8PtUJJSr3niBaSgxBtqcpPxORiFY04=; b=d+UmhheomCxCzmn5N3s6dcWzrAm1AsJKaFK3PG8chPqmiNFoadNrtK1bwJ1n8APg/x HxYKjpn/+LL1BwuNaHC/ZUQkx/+w9r4RXagrwZP2rGpF0Zc9Sc4L2mpFIuq5j2U+9hyx 5yh/GQLNIDhbuLj96FoMD6O8JNc2XDRC+fnQ9ANJeOAInOG/Z8+9dJKVSugWsuTNzSnI eWVY0Ywd1GeQHaG0TA3u6nIOcoLer+rUaXwVgkYOO4AkMVQIVgou4a3+f36dKfDlnNLN nhPnQks/gpAMbQtnh7BDRdLQCgVaSHDP/4p/zvy7+LS2MdNXxzvmHQzBuM1GqID9wT9V OsGw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmux7LQbaVYfPsnpsJKxKToQZJW6RxQTI/MbD1pXjg7bmDk7M8Tp+k7SuZBlLOOABgrvd8B X-Received: by 10.49.83.40 with SMTP id n8mr853206qey.88.1383475168550; Sun, 03 Nov 2013 02:39:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id a9sm36506591qed.6.2013.11.03.02.39.27 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 03 Nov 2013 02:39:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3dCDCf3yfxz2CG4w for ; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 05:39:26 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2013 05:39:26 -0500 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Subject: Re: ports/183120: x11-toolkits/linux-f10-pango fails to build Message-ID: <20131103053926.0193292b@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <201311030650.rA36o1ot043077@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <201311030650.rA36o1ot043077@freefall.freebsd.org> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.3) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAHlBMVEUAAABYRlwJCw4FAgAIBwKprDkBAQFQLR0BAgCir7VRttp8AAACAUlEQVQ4jZWUTYvbMBCGTVl8V2hX6Gg5G5FbWQdBj0lEfE7BhN4cyzi5Wt1E5L70roWy6N92xok/skkP+5IYrMcz78xIduDWpNM3vFzuA/jX5EY1AI6KHFwW/CzFuQAwqUBbV12p+CzIh6Awq7sg33pn5D64SQXAexffeuQlA/L35RrkaB551OjGfP/cAO8mCNaDcgvfky5ijoD0pAXlCQCnljiAjsJD9Ax05Ko5sZxbnLQcmM+dZg5IjREfZrWIHK0JuwU68pAGwHvfRxBundRzTxxz3r9dNUikPsEihjz2Dc4kjp1hKsJGuot4EDxaxzMoC7XqhxhOSfZrTS6gSX1JVdjp+o1PvWfekXgw3WL0g70nDEwA0H0HQsEZc8sTmFMTkWUfYWC/vdR1zQy3xLQgLwzu90QnlnFLjeiGWBjwhb4Sa42IqOg2qqS4O1/zhKokFUb1Q8Rj4Eb69WVflXEehJ35DgChVTE5n50eaGyMLOfH8AOodoSM4PVYAQgQdBulOa+knklYks3vAuQ+uX492lTl+A+e8qBV2AKoXalVKFfyuUp0pUp1ARaUHh82lv9MN+Ig7CZtgE6FNYvjlywT2VP2dMgOG46gTIWcqdfvuwyXNz0oMJNd/N5lh1YNiJt19ADTUo3VuFSNeQwVqRSrGjSCp53fk2g+Mvfk/gfoPxHeUS8MH9vRAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 10:39:30 -0000 On Sun, 3 Nov 2013 06:50:01 GMT Wayne Sierke articulated: > The following reply was made to PR ports/183120; it has been noted by > GNATS. > > From: Wayne Sierke > To: freebsd-gnats-submit > Cc: > Subject: Re: ports/183120: x11-toolkits/linux-f10-pango fails to build > Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 17:15:22 +1030 > > I also see exactly the same symptom both with portmaster and 'make > install' on the system indicated below, which is not running the new > pkg system. > > FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE-p7 #0: Mon Sep 9 21:34:37 UTC 2013 > root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC > amd64 I am continuing to have the same problem. I just tried to build it last night and of course it bombed out. FreeBSD scorpio.seibercom.net 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0: Fri Aug 17 13:52:14 EDT 2012 gerard@scorpio.seibercom.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SCORPIO amd64 -- Jerry â™” Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 3 13:27:04 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FA07476 for ; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 13:27:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglists@martinlaabs.de) Received: from relay05.alfahosting-server.de (relay05.alfahosting-server.de [109.237.142.241]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BB512E97 for ; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 13:27:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by relay05.alfahosting-server.de (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 4E39132CC72B; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 14:12:43 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-DCC: : X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=7.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.2.5 Received: from alfa3018.alfahosting-server.de (alfa3018.alfahosting-server.de [109.237.140.30]) by relay05.alfahosting-server.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0AB132CC728 for ; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 14:12:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from desktop-01.martinlaabs.de (p579D2175.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.157.33.117]) by alfa3018.alfahosting-server.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF53E515C867 for ; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 14:12:41 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <52764BB4.9000007@martinlaabs.de> Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 14:12:20 +0100 From: Martin Laabs User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Subject: 5Ghz WLan USB Stick recommendation? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Status: No X-Virus-Checker-Version: clamassassin 1.2.4 with ClamAV 0.97.3/18056/Sun Nov 3 12:41:09 2013 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 13:27:04 -0000 Hi, can someone recommend me a current available USB WLan stick with 5GHz support? In my flat there are so many 2.4GHz Wlans nearby that I reach only about 100kbit/s even 2m from my access point. Since my AP already supports 5GHz Wlan I search a stick for my FreeBSD-9 powered laptop. (So I would prefer a very small one even if the antenna is not as effective as the antenna in bigger sticks.) Thank you, Martin Laabs From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 3 16:56:33 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFF5CD2D for ; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 16:56:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from info@martinlaabs.de) Received: from relay02.alfahosting-server.de (relay02.alfahosting-server.de [109.237.142.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9968A2746 for ; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 16:56:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by relay01.alfahosting-server.de (Postfix, from userid 1001) id EC10B32CBA26; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 17:26:15 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-DCC: : X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=7.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.2.5 Received: from alfa3018.alfahosting-server.de (alfa3018.alfahosting-server.de [109.237.140.30]) by relay01.alfahosting-server.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2BE032CBA1E for ; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 17:26:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from desktop-01.martinlaabs.de (p5DDAA3B1.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.218.163.177]) by alfa3018.alfahosting-server.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8BC2D515E17A for ; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 17:26:13 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <52767924.3080700@martinlaabs.de> Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 17:26:12 +0100 From: Martin Laabs User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bcache for FreeBSD? References: <93B87A48-A857-4A16-89B2-CA480A80C63C@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <93B87A48-A857-4A16-89B2-CA480A80C63C@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Status: No X-Virus-Checker-Version: clamassassin 1.2.4 with ClamAV 0.97.3/18057/Sun Nov 3 13:47:16 2013 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 16:56:33 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, > Is there anything like this for FreeBSD; With ZFS you can use a SSD as second level ARC (read+metadata) cache as well as configuring a write cache. Best regards, Martin Laabs -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.21 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSdnkkAAoJEON3vNM1s3RjBQ4IAI3Emw2ee7A501v2IC0hq9gw ABw0EMKcCuQ0MPuh+5ACJRnSqNSDSZse+jy/NuQGwO1YKDcCCTwutFgRr5XZEg6w kLMQLxeCOTAP4+nEdV0yNvp284MvzMtKZDJO8sQwSRfHEHUBs5Zdci/EwLwwQhNb ttty3ASGa7WWD4LF6ZwYHMIszNQvOPUATc+qjvm1xbPp/6MCeHgF26tJwTwK01ml VtHWHc7FTkWmMPehfhHz/n2iymv88ozmsBvf2qUH8MlBmBLJIoH3UUuWRM5iI8hg TEYHeblAdl/0syxBhEqxUmCCA/s4IYB/iFlf1Ua7c54LR976Ae04eYztuNc8HVc= =QRwC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 4 01:15:23 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B74D89B1 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 01:15:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erich@alogt.com) Received: from alogt.com (alogt.com [69.36.191.58]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EB302E1D for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 01:15:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alogt.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=rMQSxO5Na2NfGGMR3wSWS9EUZof9uyY9xQM5FbL5QfI=; b=er8U6zCGz1PDtJAHJE1zVxptvIDX2DLPnEtFd9R+m7iRqOFSQ4HmNpGVHZFlEJYIcFumv0BWWFwLlJMWWJFY6YZ5PWTQiPkibw7kDfd6IKXf6zOv5Kgo40anjH8Io35lS8SlE2WELPTWztHO9lDk09WEr8WW0UiIbt0T8RelDSU=; Received: from [39.192.232.140] (port=43057 helo=X220.ovitrap.com) by sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net with esmtpsa (SSLv3:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Vd8l9-000Egs-6D; Sun, 03 Nov 2013 18:15:16 -0700 Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 09:15:08 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky To: Martin Laabs Subject: Re: 5Ghz WLan USB Stick recommendation? Message-ID: <20131104091508.5596542b@X220.ovitrap.com> In-Reply-To: <52764BB4.9000007@martinlaabs.de> References: <52764BB4.9000007@martinlaabs.de> Organization: ALO Green Technologies X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - alogt.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net: authenticated_id: erich@alogt.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 01:15:23 -0000 Hi, On Sun, 03 Nov 2013 14:12:20 +0100 Martin Laabs wrote: > can someone recommend me a current available USB WLan stick with 5GHz > support? In my flat there are so many 2.4GHz Wlans nearby that I reach > only about 100kbit/s even 2m from my access point. > Since my AP already supports 5GHz Wlan I search a stick for my > FreeBSD-9 powered laptop. (So I would prefer a very small one even if > the antenna is not as effective as the antenna in bigger sticks.) I have only a built-in solution. One other question. Why don't you use a cable when you are so close? I have always a cable plugged in on the access point. When I come closer, I switch to the cable. Erich From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 4 07:01:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E68840A for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 07:01:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gibblertron@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-x230.google.com (mail-pb0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3505F2D29 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 07:01:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pb0-f48.google.com with SMTP id mc17so6690488pbc.7 for ; Sun, 03 Nov 2013 23:01:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:content-type; bh=Rw6hTjYEyVoljlBpRzX2MG3bHYUWwlJcEbEBUCac79Y=; b=DcJRe1yv23wErFt+/kqc5a+P2TEXJngDx96io4uXgFAwfkmAEUyGhYI9e2qEV8iiuB POjOfWa06mmKzKGXPM7+MLZUz38XgiL38Vb7X1a8BWT8H6hMLoN95gxoevqZ+/cjVHDt jX0m6cKacHq137S98VdHGlSDasWQGw8O5MEaPgQ4sRNL0wtehO9ppgXSsNcvpRpUqRoz hKHcpA8V+Wh9w0glGSdghcNrg3CnWHtKV2hy65z0zqLH+Tg+4Eyuf6O2MfJYqa9AMpYn S+2IJfnK8ePHaSSKk+Gs6YqIKOPkTanXsKBlDcpoj4Bxt8EqI4mvKGuoYELuQzctVRtq jIEg== X-Received: by 10.68.166.3 with SMTP id zc3mr16352080pbb.95.1383548103836; Sun, 03 Nov 2013 22:55:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.42.110] (S0106001b63f4e3e0.vw.shawcable.net. [70.70.130.221]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id dq3sm26168546pbc.35.2013.11.03.22.55.02 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 03 Nov 2013 22:55:03 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2013 22:55:02 -0800 From: Patrick To: Hung Son Nguyen Message-ID: <4A81DD9296F8430B85647757F8FBABCC@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: Install software on FreeBSD Jail X-Mailer: sparrow 1.3.5 (build 507.62) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 07:01:02 -0000 You should check out ezjail in the ports tree if you haven't already. It = has a notion of =22flavours=22 which achieves the same end result. =20 Patrick =20 On Thursday, October 31, 2013 at 4:23, Hung Son Nguyen wrote: > Hi guys, > =20 > Can I install software on Jail without entering the Jail=3F > Because I plan to write a shell script that can automatically create ja= il > with java and sql installed. Through documentation on the internet, I s= ee > some instructions about installing software on =46reeBSD Jail but I hav= e to > enter Jail. > =20 > I expected to listen your supports as soon as possible. > =20 > Thanks, > =20 > -- =20 > * Nguy=E1=BB=85n H=C3=B9ng S=C6=A1n* > --- University of Information Technology - VNU HCMC > --- Phone: (+84) 1689 975 376 > --- Yahoo: nguyensonuit > --- Skype: nguyensonuit > =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F > freebsd-questions=40freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to =22freebsd-questions-unsubscribe=40fre= ebsd.org=22 > =20 > =20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 4 07:55:36 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFEB62F7 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 07:55:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglists@martinlaabs.de) Received: from relay04.alfahosting-server.de (relay04.alfahosting-server.de [109.237.142.240]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9DAE223F for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 07:55:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by relay04.alfahosting-server.de (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E6F4E32CEE6F; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 08:44:14 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-DCC: : X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=7.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.2.5 Received: from alfa3018.alfahosting-server.de (alfa3018.alfahosting-server.de [109.237.140.30]) by relay04.alfahosting-server.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5052D32CEE97; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 08:44:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from laabs.hf.ifn.et.tu-dresden.de (hfsync.ifn.et.tu-dresden.de [141.30.128.60]) by alfa3018.alfahosting-server.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3BEEE515C023; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 08:44:12 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5277504C.3010107@martinlaabs.de> Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 08:44:12 +0100 From: Martin Laabs User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Erich Dollansky Subject: Re: 5Ghz WLan USB Stick recommendation? References: <52764BB4.9000007@martinlaabs.de> <20131104091508.5596542b@X220.ovitrap.com> In-Reply-To: <20131104091508.5596542b@X220.ovitrap.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Status: No X-Virus-Checker-Version: clamassassin 1.2.4 with ClamAV 0.97.3/18062/Mon Nov 4 06:40:08 2013 Cc: FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 07:55:37 -0000 Hi, [5Ghz WLAN] > I have only a built-in solution. Can you tell me the chipset. Often the chipset ist also available with a USB interface. > One other question. Why don't you use a cable when you are so close? I > have always a cable plugged in on the access point. When I come closer, > I switch to the cable. I just wanted to give a example that even if the signal is strong (short distance) I am unable to get a satisfactory speed. In general I am more far from the AP. Best regards, Martin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 4 08:55:43 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54397D88 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 08:55:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erich@alogt.com) Received: from alogt.com (alogt.com [69.36.191.58]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C2052558 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 08:55:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alogt.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=m1Qob34Xw9zhiwb0o/amJEoUAsfgWOJCcC1xub0sUf0=; b=xPxmU7YWT1bw7iBHjHYt92qlc8XfrNBc2Cpo7ffjLXZiNu/pI/qbm4OJpnNPzxyevjAw62VLa6LRMYFSzYbZBE9H7+9461FHbahs1wGaTBbE503cmuEGMxH64y67h1b8vHew/4Qdxb4sZcCGkcNSnSvZyWrwtGSfFMtPjZWjhN0=; Received: from [39.192.232.140] (port=45413 helo=X220.ovitrap.com) by sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net with esmtpsa (SSLv3:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1VdFwi-002Z7r-Os; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 01:55:41 -0700 Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 16:55:23 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky To: Martin Laabs Subject: Re: 5Ghz WLan USB Stick recommendation? Message-ID: <20131104165523.7c022214@X220.ovitrap.com> In-Reply-To: <5277504C.3010107@martinlaabs.de> References: <52764BB4.9000007@martinlaabs.de> <20131104091508.5596542b@X220.ovitrap.com> <5277504C.3010107@martinlaabs.de> Organization: ALO Green Technologies X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - alogt.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net: authenticated_id: erich@alogt.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 08:55:43 -0000 Hi, On Mon, 04 Nov 2013 08:44:12 +0100 Martin Laabs wrote: > [5Ghz WLAN] > > > I have only a built-in solution. > > Can you tell me the chipset. Often the chipset ist also available > with a USB interface. dmesg says: iwn0: mem 0xf2500000-0xf2501fff irq 17 at device 0.0 on pci3 I am not able to tell how good the support for 5GHz is as my access point does not provide a signal at this frequency. Erich From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 4 14:32:23 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27DE4D1D; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 14:32:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@vmeta.jp) Received: from glory.vmeta.jp (7c2952d4.i-revonet.jp [124.41.82.212]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E76C32901; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 14:32:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from icepick.vmeta.jp (softbank126005049169.bbtec.net [126.5.49.169]) by glory.vmeta.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8AF432B5; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 23:32:14 +0900 (JST) Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 23:32:11 +0900 From: Koichiro IWAO To: Kevin Lo Subject: Re: Elecom WDC-433SU2M USB wireless dongle timeouts waiting for MCU to initialize Message-ID: <20131104143210.GA1810@icepick.vmeta.jp> References: <20131102183543.GA29930@icepick.vmeta.jp> <527660C3.8020009@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <527660C3.8020009@FreeBSD.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) Cc: questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 14:32:23 -0000 On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 10:42:11PM +0800, Kevin Lo wrote: > What version are you running? Could you run -CURRENT and see if that > works for you? > Thanks. 9-STABLE. I also tried on patched 11-CURRENT r257634 but same result. -- `whois vmeta.jp | nkf -w` meta From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 4 18:26:17 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 526A47C2 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 18:26:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from drew@mykitchentable.net) Received: from blu0-omc4-s9.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc4-s9.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.111.148]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1823A28E1 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 18:26:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU0-SMTP351 ([65.55.111.137]) by blu0-omc4-s9.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 4 Nov 2013 10:25:10 -0800 X-TMN: [f6NX9LL0A3MYHJBX0sOZlB1fcNxoPqZs] X-Originating-Email: [drew@mykitchentable.net] Message-ID: Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([69.62.230.77]) by BLU0-SMTP351.phx.gbl over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 4 Nov 2013 10:25:08 -0800 Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 10:24:58 -0800 From: Drew Tomlinson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: ERROR - Cannot get GEOM tree Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 131104-2, 11/04/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Nov 2013 18:25:09.0021 (UTC) FILETIME=[313EE4D0:01CED98B] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 18:26:17 -0000 I've been happily running FBSD on a HP e60 Netserver for the past 13 years. It's been so reliable, I've tended to just forget about it. However after a power outage, it will no longer boot. I've done some testing and got it booted with a 9.2 LiveCD. I think the version of FBSD on this box is 6.4. It has two 9 GB SCSI drives that I had striped using gstripe. I think one of those drives has died but would like to confirm before giving up. I've tried rewriting the MBR to both disks using "fdisk -B -b /boot/boot0 daX" but get this error: Cannot get GEOM tree: Illegal byte sequence I've also tried "gstripe list" but get the same error. My stripe is "/dev/stripe/data" so I tried mounting it with "mount /dev/stripe/data /mnt/data". I get this error: mount: /dev/stripe/data: R/W mount of /usr denied. Filesystem is not clean - run fsck.: Operation not permitted So I tried to run "fsck /dev/stripe/data". Another error: fsck: Could not determine filesystem type I suspect one or both members of my stripe are dead. Can anyone confirm? Is there anything else I can check before giving up? Thanks, Drew -- Like card tricks? Visit The Alchemist's Warehouse to learn card magic secrets for free! --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 4 18:34:34 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8408EAAB for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 18:34:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pd0-x233.google.com (mail-pd0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D098296B for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 18:34:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pd0-f179.google.com with SMTP id y10so6965865pdj.24 for ; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 10:34:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=gtIUsJuwnjAUJHsYItwvrN0yCdb6P6GAAwJ8jKpR6p4=; b=XUCFFlfNQ4VCZEsATHJmnedexBiZevEHj52antWNvhL0w3YSJsYn8QqB8h0eiSal7K VoVBx/255tPbKZcWlBpaMjdvL4ggjQo3q66a7nPUKFxkONz63P41b4RH5QP4njOXmTBE 7pvbqh+YFf11//POAFQlA5Cwnl+IHSZiA8ZECzf16uSE4Ue5tCtgfiLLAXcdOGFN5U3C Gw4hhEILNhxYqjSQpyzOqCTJ9gsiSdrv+j/QBUNsFk7vdVyr4ye+K2XnS4BKbdJ+1gfO vC1CDJSEbctPp7R8worAhGSoci57XbkVpIk4PjqzVmikbq7jaUkYDw6ZJOdWKBWMJOOY 2IMw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.99.99 with SMTP id ep3mr19043521pbb.107.1383590073960; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 10:34:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.92.79 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 10:34:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 12:34:33 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ERROR - Cannot get GEOM tree From: Adam Vande More To: Drew Tomlinson Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 18:34:34 -0000 On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Drew Tomlinson wrote: > I've been happily running FBSD on a HP e60 Netserver for the past 13 > years. It's been so reliable, I've tended to just forget about it. However > after a power outage, it will no longer boot. > > I've done some testing and got it booted with a 9.2 LiveCD. I think the > version of FBSD on this box is 6.4. It has two 9 GB SCSI drives that I had > striped using gstripe. I think one of those drives has died but would like > to confirm before giving up. > > I've tried rewriting the MBR to both disks using "fdisk -B -b /boot/boot0 > daX" but get this error: > > Cannot get GEOM tree: Illegal byte sequence > > I've also tried "gstripe list" but get the same error. > > My stripe is "/dev/stripe/data" so I tried mounting it with "mount > /dev/stripe/data /mnt/data". I get this error: > > mount: /dev/stripe/data: R/W mount of /usr denied. Filesystem is not clean > - run fsck.: Operation not permitted > > So I tried to run "fsck /dev/stripe/data". Another error: > > fsck: Could not determine filesystem type > > I suspect one or both members of my stripe are dead. Can anyone confirm? > Is there anything else I can check before giving up? > There should be related messages in dmesg and /var/log/messages. -- Adam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 4 18:44:55 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C78EAD04 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 18:44:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from drew@mykitchentable.net) Received: from blu0-omc4-s37.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc4-s37.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.111.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 903A329F7 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 18:44:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU0-SMTP380 ([65.55.111.137]) by blu0-omc4-s37.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 4 Nov 2013 10:43:48 -0800 X-TMN: [d5v2rH/v2ui3m168lmEYg6f9FtKDVf7V] X-Originating-Email: [drew@mykitchentable.net] Message-ID: Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([69.62.230.77]) by BLU0-SMTP380.phx.gbl over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 4 Nov 2013 10:43:46 -0800 Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 10:43:37 -0800 From: Drew Tomlinson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adam Vande More Subject: Re: ERROR - Cannot get GEOM tree References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 131104-2, 11/04/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Nov 2013 18:43:46.0738 (UTC) FILETIME=[CB74F920:01CED98D] Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 18:44:55 -0000 On 11/4/2013 10:34 AM, Adam Vande More wrote: > On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Drew Tomlinson wrote: > >> I've been happily running FBSD on a HP e60 Netserver for the past 13 >> years. It's been so reliable, I've tended to just forget about it. However >> after a power outage, it will no longer boot. >> >> I've done some testing and got it booted with a 9.2 LiveCD. I think the >> version of FBSD on this box is 6.4. It has two 9 GB SCSI drives that I had >> striped using gstripe. I think one of those drives has died but would like >> to confirm before giving up. >> >> I've tried rewriting the MBR to both disks using "fdisk -B -b /boot/boot0 >> daX" but get this error: >> >> Cannot get GEOM tree: Illegal byte sequence >> >> I've also tried "gstripe list" but get the same error. >> >> My stripe is "/dev/stripe/data" so I tried mounting it with "mount >> /dev/stripe/data /mnt/data". I get this error: >> >> mount: /dev/stripe/data: R/W mount of /usr denied. Filesystem is not clean >> - run fsck.: Operation not permitted >> >> So I tried to run "fsck /dev/stripe/data". Another error: >> >> fsck: Could not determine filesystem type >> >> I suspect one or both members of my stripe are dead. Can anyone confirm? >> Is there anything else I can check before giving up? >> > > There should be related messages in dmesg and /var/log/messages. Thank you for your reply. I found these in /var/log/messages. I assume this confirms a drive failure? Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 00 00 04 2e 79 00 0 0 01 00 Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): CAM status: SCSI Status Error Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI status: Check Condition Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI sense: ILLEGAL REQUEST asc:64,0 (Illegal mode for this track) Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Info: 0x42e79 Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Error 6, Unretryable error Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): cddone: got error 0x6 back Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: GEOM_STRIPE: Device data created (id=2880277341). Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: GEOM_STRIPE: Disk da0s1d attached to data. Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: GEOM_STRIPE: Disk da1s1d attached to data. Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: GEOM_STRIPE: Device stripe/data activated. Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 00 00 04 2e 79 00 00 01 00 Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): CAM status: SCSI Status Error Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI status: Check Condition Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI sense: ILLEGAL REQUEST asc:64,0 (Illegal mode for this track) Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Info: 0x42e79 Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Error 6, Unretryable error Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): cddone: got error 0x6 back Nov 4 10:49:47 kernel: GEOM_STRIPE: Disk da0s1d removed from data. Nov 4 10:49:47 kernel: GEOM_STRIPE: Device stripe/data deactivated. Nov 4 10:49:53 kernel: GEOM_STRIPE: Disk da0s1d attached to data. Nov 4 10:49:53 kernel: GEOM_STRIPE: Device stripe/data activated. Nov 4 10:50:02 kernel: GEOM_STRIPE: Disk da0s1d removed from data. Nov 4 10:50:02 kernel: GEOM_STRIPE: Device stripe/data deactivated. Nov 4 10:50:05 kernel: GEOM_STRIPE: Disk da0s1d attached to data. -- Like card tricks? Visit The Alchemist's Warehouse to learn card magic secrets for free! http://alchemistswarehouse.com --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 4 19:07:56 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51FDC89E for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 19:07:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-x22a.google.com (mail-pb0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BB902BA8 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 19:07:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pb0-f42.google.com with SMTP id jt11so7563798pbb.29 for ; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 11:07:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=1tK2eLxlI2VPCIS4plfk/g6DDgZJyHYvqOvQVS6rN54=; b=WXfbp9arwuNDlJ8vJFmJu/qxGPMnzqD8bGDGojQ35yWrlzBzZWnfY52J9+WF3bElYR nDBVIZFV+ZCC5lJjTHmv5oEdAFJoXE8jRIyf+S1YtFKLaIqtnGh5lzDXVJPeyaZP6r0k fjVgxDGkKt9J3lrYYFe59ks0oh06gWg7kuSB2v6vmOgOQCbhs1dQvCUE+EdqUA5Ha2na gw5drAfMrGMLk2pKew/lsjlvrF1KQB6XVUkHHs6vwPRRhC5w1WgCEpSY4Qd6RClH6CPn 743cs418WeKwr3Zphy90pUSMzonDceXpL/yuLO2a/dvRIt1DudRqSgTKBzfYfXwDMyep jWmA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.51.34 with SMTP id h2mr2414213pao.181.1383592075697; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 11:07:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.92.79 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 11:07:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 13:07:55 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ERROR - Cannot get GEOM tree From: Adam Vande More To: Drew Tomlinson Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 19:07:56 -0000 On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Drew Tomlinson wrote: > Thank you for your reply. I found these in /var/log/messages. I assume > this confirms a drive failure? > > Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 00 00 04 2e > 79 00 0 > 0 01 00 > Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): CAM status: SCSI Status Error > Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI status: Check Condition > Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI sense: ILLEGAL REQUEST > asc:64,0 > (Illegal mode for this track) > Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Info: 0x42e79 > Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Error 6, Unretryable error > Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): cddone: got error 0x6 back > Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: GEOM_STRIPE: Device data created (id=2880277341). > Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: GEOM_STRIPE: Disk da0s1d attached to data. > Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: GEOM_STRIPE: Disk da1s1d attached to data. > Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: GEOM_STRIPE: Device stripe/data activated. > Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 00 00 04 2e > 79 00 00 01 00 > Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): CAM status: SCSI Status Error > Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI status: Check Condition > Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI sense: ILLEGAL REQUEST > asc:64,0 (Illegal mode for this track) > Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Info: 0x42e79 > Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Error 6, Unretryable error > Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): cddone: got error 0x6 back > Nov 4 10:49:47 kernel: GEOM_STRIPE: Disk da0s1d removed from data. > Nov 4 10:49:47 kernel: GEOM_STRIPE: Device stripe/data deactivated. > Nov 4 10:49:53 kernel: GEOM_STRIPE: Disk da0s1d attached to data. > Nov 4 10:49:53 kernel: GEOM_STRIPE: Device stripe/data activated. > Nov 4 10:50:02 kernel: GEOM_STRIPE: Disk da0s1d removed from data. > Nov 4 10:50:02 kernel: GEOM_STRIPE: Device stripe/data deactivated. > Nov 4 10:50:05 kernel: GEOM_STRIPE: Disk da0s1d attached to data. No it doesn't confirm it although what da0 is showing isn't expected. Install /usr/ports/sysutils/smartmontools if you haven't already and run: smartctl -a /dev/da0 and smartctl -a /dev/da1 It could be the GEOM meta-data got corrupted. No fsck will work until that has been addressed. -- Adam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 4 19:15:18 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F79EBCC for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 19:15:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from drew@mykitchentable.net) Received: from blu0-omc4-s16.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc4-s16.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.111.155]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5760C2C12 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 19:15:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU0-SMTP381 ([65.55.111.135]) by blu0-omc4-s16.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 4 Nov 2013 11:14:11 -0800 X-TMN: [aLBJykG9lWOy1jwSF2d4ZHhx5NmekMN3] X-Originating-Email: [drew@mykitchentable.net] Message-ID: Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([69.62.230.77]) by BLU0-SMTP381.phx.gbl over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 4 Nov 2013 11:14:08 -0800 Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 11:13:59 -0800 From: Drew Tomlinson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adam Vande More Subject: Re: ERROR - Cannot get GEOM tree References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 131104-2, 11/04/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Nov 2013 19:14:09.0264 (UTC) FILETIME=[09C45F00:01CED992] Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 19:15:18 -0000 On 11/4/2013 11:07 AM, Adam Vande More wrote: > On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Drew Tomlinson wrote: > >> Thank you for your reply. I found these in /var/log/messages. I assume >> this confirms a drive failure? >> >> Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 00 00 04 2e >> 79 00 0 >> 0 01 00 >> Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): CAM status: SCSI Status Error >> Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI status: Check Condition >> Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI sense: ILLEGAL REQUEST >> asc:64,0 >> (Illegal mode for this track) >> Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Info: 0x42e79 >> Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Error 6, Unretryable error >> Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): cddone: got error 0x6 back >> Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: GEOM_STRIPE: Device data created (id=2880277341). >> Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: GEOM_STRIPE: Disk da0s1d attached to data. >> Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: GEOM_STRIPE: Disk da1s1d attached to data. >> Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: GEOM_STRIPE: Device stripe/data activated. >> Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 00 00 04 2e >> 79 00 00 01 00 >> Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): CAM status: SCSI Status Error >> Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI status: Check Condition >> Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI sense: ILLEGAL REQUEST >> asc:64,0 (Illegal mode for this track) >> Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Info: 0x42e79 >> Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Error 6, Unretryable error >> Nov 4 10:10:21 kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): cddone: got error 0x6 back >> Nov 4 10:49:47 kernel: GEOM_STRIPE: Disk da0s1d removed from data. >> Nov 4 10:49:47 kernel: GEOM_STRIPE: Device stripe/data deactivated. >> Nov 4 10:49:53 kernel: GEOM_STRIPE: Disk da0s1d attached to data. >> Nov 4 10:49:53 kernel: GEOM_STRIPE: Device stripe/data activated. >> Nov 4 10:50:02 kernel: GEOM_STRIPE: Disk da0s1d removed from data. >> Nov 4 10:50:02 kernel: GEOM_STRIPE: Device stripe/data deactivated. >> Nov 4 10:50:05 kernel: GEOM_STRIPE: Disk da0s1d attached to data. > > No it doesn't confirm it although what da0 is showing isn't expected. > Install /usr/ports/sysutils/smartmontools if you haven't already and run: > > smartctl -a /dev/da0 > > and > > smartctl -a /dev/da1 > > It could be the GEOM meta-data got corrupted. No fsck will work until that > has been addressed. Thank you. I appreciate your help. I am only booted from the LiveCD and smartmontools does not appear to be included. Is there another way to confirm the drives or just try to repair the GEOM meta-tag? -- Like card tricks? Visit The Alchemist's Warehouse to learn card magic secrets for free! http://alchemistswarehouse.com --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 4 19:40:29 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AF52615 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 19:40:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from four.harrisons@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-we0-x231.google.com (mail-we0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6E792D8B for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 19:40:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f177.google.com with SMTP id x55so2516839wes.22 for ; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 11:40:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=ZuJmZlgAu+ZLoKwVVpGwMetLciP6UhwpUiSJ33MT2Qg=; b=p7B9asJg/q7YDWISMN0goq/1suZz/ijyJlImpHz2SPvLH7jmty2BChhJZjLoUo83lC sEClRwf9KQ+V66DCyRnF3Ec+uEZJzP9odMRKJZwSQOHLh1YuDUWkFF7fdjh1MMIZPq3h s67jn50Ku/YCAqEB2p3GJLizkHYm/qNPxnZm2zzSTBxSLb3rJJFnsHjuBig4KiXSGSwd 5ns2MldZna8d2TJ85AUhNfP+B+rs/uJ8U0Flcoy/GaVrxdQNUb8pNw+cJiORVE0tD+Lm 3+MDOgPxrd+RRQSpA0RHHU4Jtu/Bl0eA6+qXzYwh1jfrXLP1iJvWIR3mTWwejR8bmjOU 2jQA== X-Received: by 10.180.13.142 with SMTP id h14mr13725744wic.3.1383594027023; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 11:40:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (client-86-9-248-80.oxfd-bam-1.adsl.virginm.net. [86.9.248.80]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id mw9sm27413747wib.0.2013.11.04.11.40.24 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 04 Nov 2013 11:40:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by localhost (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 05 Nov 2013 19:39:56 +0000 From: Peter Harrison Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 19:39:55 +0000 To: Craig Whipp Subject: Re: Chromium rendering problem Message-ID: <20131105193955.GA1783@thinkpad.piggybox> References: <20131029203647.GA3728@thinkpad.piggybox> <20131029205603.137c2eb6@avatar.davids-website.com> <20131031201101.GA3456@thinkpad.piggybox> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 19:40:29 -0000 Friday, 1 November 2013 at 8:57:35 -0700, Craig Whipp said: > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Peter Harrison > wrote: > > Tuesday, 29 October 2013 at 20:56:03 +0000, LtCdData said: > >> On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 20:36:47 +0000 > >> Peter Harrison wrote: > >> > >> > Hello list. > >> > > >> > I'm encountering a rendering problem in Chromium on 9.2-RELEASE. > >> > > >> > I updated my machine recently from 9.2-R from 9.1-R, and then ran a port update which pulled in several updates - including bringing Chromium up to 30.0.1599.101 from 30.0.1599.69, among other things. > >> > > >> > I now have a rendering problem in Chromium. On some sights, it will render the page initially before the render is complete however the page blanks to white - no content visible at all. This happens consistently for example on www.theguardian.com/uk and play.google.com > >> > > >> > Other (presumably simpler) sites render fine - eg. www.freebsd.org. > >> > > >> > Any ideas where to look for a fix? I've tried disabling my only extension (Vimium) to no effect. I've tried install a flashblocker (no difference). I don't have flash installed > >> > > >> > This is on a Lenovo Thinkpad X60 with 9.2-R i386 and a GENERIC kernel using the intel xorg driver: > >> > > >> > xorg-7.7 X.Org complete distribution metaport > >> > xorg-server-1.7.7_10,1 X.Org X server and related programs > >> > xf86-video-intel-2.7.1_5 Driver for Intel integrated graphics chipsets > >> > > >> > > >> > Thanks for your help, > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Peter Harrison. > >> > >> not sure if this is the same issue i had but...... > >> > >> http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=15163 > >> /etc/sysctl.conf > >> kern.ipc.shm_allow_removed=1 > >> /etc/rc.d/sysctl restart > >> > fixed it for me... _______________________________________________ > > > > > > Thanks... > > > > But it's not that. > > > > I have kern.ipc.shm_allow_removed set to 1 > > > > Without that, nothing works. > > > > With it some sites work (eg. www.freebsd.org), but some don't (www.theguardian.com). > > > > I've now deleted and the installed again all my ports using the process in the portmaster manpage, just in case it was something that got disconnected in the update to the latest chromium. > > > > Is anyone else seeing this? > > > > > > > > > > Peter. > > > > Yes. I have this exact problem, too. > > - Craig Thanks - good to know it's not just me. I'll mail the maintainer and see if they've any ideas. Cheers, Peter. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 4 19:41:47 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9515A6BD for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 19:41:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from four.harrisons@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-x22a.google.com (mail-wg0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E97F2DA3 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 19:41:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id n12so2185862wgh.3 for ; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 11:41:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=LkIRXiCCHKILqfjAmqbozED7kPfyyTZkpnmLBEjuPok=; b=P0KERFTBjzPL54vn5JGOzsUSp13AYrxh0ww34Yww8N7U1Lmx3KHmNO1baZOjBwR+PD /mjAEg1xG+ugkrSBFpTvGLlgHuo5OSOpBTMzS+otxD5N8k2DZkAYeY6Hst4jieKtKqJC RbszHLksOf44mSt7pDJS3+NWEYI9Orh4T8JrRFjQO8lGbxqUa62TB3KY/DvGn92Nf6Zb QCpHcRbIOnLDLQ6ClRC2dZy581E8a3QGHyyMY7hCu4HU1s5fQm9KbfPekcISECth8KKx cfdweXN3XDOnv5eJwlpKEaVk5lJEnk6UBh9HdP4mT2+CxeOna3JmZf4XYvSX91pcadtl mkww== X-Received: by 10.194.78.51 with SMTP id y19mr2783528wjw.62.1383594105574; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 11:41:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (client-86-9-248-80.oxfd-bam-1.adsl.virginm.net. [86.9.248.80]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id td6sm6905326wic.10.2013.11.04.11.41.43 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 04 Nov 2013 11:41:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by localhost (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 05 Nov 2013 19:41:15 +0000 From: Peter Harrison Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 19:41:15 +0000 To: Rod Person Subject: Re: Chromium rendering problem Message-ID: <20131105194114.GB1783@thinkpad.piggybox> References: <20131029203647.GA3728@thinkpad.piggybox> <20131029205603.137c2eb6@avatar.davids-website.com> <20131031201101.GA3456@thinkpad.piggybox> <5273D053.9070404@rodperson.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5273D053.9070404@rodperson.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) Cc: Craig Whipp , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 19:41:47 -0000 Friday, 1 November 2013 at 12:01:23 -0400, Rod Person said: > On 11/1/2013 11:57 AM, Craig Whipp wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Peter Harrison > > wrote: > >> Is anyone else seeing this? > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Peter. > >> > > Yes. I have this exact problem, too. > > > > - Craig > > I also have this issue and I have never installed Chromium before, I had just installed it on 9.2 release to give it a try since the downfall of Opera. > > -- > Rod That's interesting. This is the first time I've built it with clang. I might try with gcc and see if that makes a difference. I'll mail the maintainer and see what they think. Peter. > > So little pains do the vulgar take in the investigation of truth, accepting readily the first story that comes to hand. > -Thucydides > History of The Peloponnesian War, 432BC > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 5 02:00:17 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A6BDD71 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 02:00:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevlo@FreeBSD.org) Received: from ns.kevlo.org (220-135-115-6.HINET-IP.hinet.net [220.135.115.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DEAD2312 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 02:00:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (mail.kevlo.org [220.135.115.6]) by ns.kevlo.org (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id rA5202n4047284; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 10:00:03 +0800 (CST) (envelope-from kevlo@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <52785127.2070000@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 10:00:07 +0800 From: Kevin Lo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Koichiro IWAO Subject: Re: Elecom WDC-433SU2M USB wireless dongle timeouts waiting for MCU to initialize References: <20131102183543.GA29930@icepick.vmeta.jp> <527660C3.8020009@FreeBSD.org> <20131104143210.GA1810@icepick.vmeta.jp> In-Reply-To: <20131104143210.GA1810@icepick.vmeta.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 02:00:17 -0000 Koichiro IWAO wrote: > On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 10:42:11PM +0800, Kevin Lo wrote: >> What version are you running? Could you run -CURRENT and see if that >> works for you? >> Thanks. > 9-STABLE. I also tried on patched 11-CURRENT r257634 but same result. > The Elecom WDC-433SU2M USB wifi dongle is based on MediaTek/Ralink MT7610U chipset, which is not supported by FreeBSD. Kevin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 5 02:41:55 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5120A509; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 02:41:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@vmeta.jp) Received: from glory.vmeta.jp (7c2952d4.i-revonet.jp [124.41.82.212]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AA6B24FA; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 02:41:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from icepick.vmeta.jp (softbank126005049169.bbtec.net [126.5.49.169]) by glory.vmeta.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9B8A5412; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 11:41:51 +0900 (JST) Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 11:41:48 +0900 From: Koichiro IWAO To: Kevin Lo Subject: Re: Elecom WDC-433SU2M USB wireless dongle timeouts waiting for MCU to initialize Message-ID: <20131105024148.GA49108@icepick.vmeta.jp> References: <20131102183543.GA29930@icepick.vmeta.jp> <527660C3.8020009@FreeBSD.org> <20131104143210.GA1810@icepick.vmeta.jp> <52785127.2070000@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52785127.2070000@FreeBSD.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 9.2-STABLE amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) Cc: questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 02:41:55 -0000 On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 10:00:07AM +0800, Kevin Lo wrote: > The Elecom WDC-433SU2M USB wifi dongle is based on MediaTek/Ralink MT7610U > chipset, which is not supported by FreeBSD. I jumped to a wrong conclusion just finding 'RT2870' in user's manual but thanks! I'll try NDIS instead of FreeBSD native driver. -- `whois vmeta.jp | nkf -w` meta From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 5 03:39:37 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16CB73B4 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 03:39:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-x229.google.com (mail-ie0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFA1327EF for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 03:39:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f169.google.com with SMTP id ar20so14109450iec.14 for ; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 19:39:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=4c+LYDfD8DflayITyfN0XMZpQYQghO4k3FIHLEOGofs=; b=vyXTWyjmbm6zfbhumUjdqtHzY5mMxrdAMm8niztGa6s21FQlQj1KlnsGbsjY9I6Ji7 4xkucMxuQf2VELcWbtS6kaD9rZBhlPbDvKVc9LHSmYlbQvfDyikE2GBjg/uhO45yfxUg rW04QuN3mGhjLNFVllEzC1sA/P9p3tOgqr0ebqa9ueaFU8j+hQmgyU2yfctqa0VBdHVx G5WJ8+9FzwwkFuv55UnsN7t3YQg5PjY+2o2zXqBMrWk+f8yDyb5vw9UF19ADsR4eX0Ll ZcW3KvoeZCKSfWH36qdYGRGoys+TrPyADU3BjSQqFaJEj0z4z8+bLBGjYNVpFAssy7NG +N9Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.67.46 with SMTP id k14mr14355399igt.16.1383622776166; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 19:39:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.43.75.6 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 19:39:36 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 21:39:36 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: How to merge svn project branches with local /usr/src? From: Nikolas Britton To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 03:39:37 -0000 Hi, I'm confused with the mechanics of merging a svn project branches into /usr/src. I would like to merge the vps code, here: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/projects/vps/ onto my FreeBSD 10-STABLE test system. I presume svn merges everything into /usr/src automatically with the right command(s)? I feel like this is a dumb question, but I'm not familiar with the new svn at all. The last time I used FreeBSD we did these things with cvs and diff patches. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 5 05:29:35 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6308A94 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 05:29:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from moonlightakkiy@yahoo.ca) Received: from nm46.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm46.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [216.109.114.62]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E52932C80 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 05:29:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.139.212.150] by nm46.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Nov 2013 05:27:36 -0000 Received: from [98.139.213.11] by tm7.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Nov 2013 05:27:36 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp111.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Nov 2013 05:27:36 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.ca; s=s1024; t=1383629256; bh=ik46JJ3tYFDVwc8BcOMS/+Ur1Z9O2z9xKRmOvnwOOyM=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-Rocket-Received:Received:X-Google-DKIM-Signature:MIME-Version:X-Received:Received:Date:Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Content-Type; b=4oAhYc8lWudJQOUCjQUpQfmETlo1u2PWi7K/599E/RpilQQ8h556IsIbZelIbqfZPgz2A7f6v4FQ+TubFEuUFV/dr5RnXecATR9968l4wsiWoKgozxxGlJoccbGnp/7QMxtyl12WYxxzpUJ2hruLgzYqwFDllSBr8e9NKkwzUf0= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 163923.92531.bm@smtp111.mail.bf1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: hriNXmwVM1nN6S3oC_JHcx5C2XygfhkspLioDVsu9tfMoDe NefkTPRdImeGGJ6Gzavw1iMBhMe76H9MsgW.WbFABB1DDgpvYZ4nVVMd8Lbx XDCn7_VcZMTiJrF3XtVkxTrepjoqK3eiVqA6TsFbd7WB_X1gou4a59PzQguk NTEtO8JPSl_o_lhm1f8qcNxRRXz60qLyzvQ7_h2NkpqagrQNKwV5RHkreukB Xql3tk4VED1m4woUHUGtpeZ7m94L5vd9rPmkZv3IG7qxsB6lYo3AphnFTEiY 8DkEruACWcZs0MLfdtnob4eTRDhqawrUPvWbDMgcSigxVSudSsOq4VSwxnv2 KsRoD6StyZh.sA8ttD26LH8a7D4bXUgJdC9MOY5iTAGb_IUvCNUzdxhZmE2P XbEvJcP3ToS611dc2ui6EYF8eEwUvLqF_FxWWMOOAYAmR1haFtUlAYVwU6fM e6MYX1MF9cyBZbvOaqdTKM24lCmP3EnNDHqJW0GRYj3SjT8b4aRvzHy6MgIC OA.5r1JqfUTFx0PcmfzfzfgLNlBgqOKAhRW5d5tV8w7730fYYPZt.KiGVG5r a X-Yahoo-SMTP: Xr6qjFWswBAEmd20sAvB4Q3keqXvXsIH9TjJ X-Rocket-Received: from mail-pa0-f53.google.com (moonlightakkiy@209.85.220.53 with ) by smtp111.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 04 Nov 2013 21:27:36 -0800 PST Received: by mail-pa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id kx10so8105294pab.12 for ; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 21:27:35 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ik46JJ3tYFDVwc8BcOMS/+Ur1Z9O2z9xKRmOvnwOOyM=; b=bAzOdBEPGX4dW97yr/qAentuAmDyLoChILr0ysR9rhkqRgg+bLfU3fUYiPuiRuHnBs AFwDSJTSHZJoAubxk4BbbZQEwRiT7OZ9qM/Ref5jbNVa6FSwzh8/MJoYiz/pQ/Gu13S9 tAdY+sUyomv7l+LDyjh9N6v8nx4KgZRfD0TDrzzBawLlTlgcwl3QtTX7ZpYnGvZepneM nSPaIfbxKpJuuwxcQtwwDluYMWkAoFl14T7LSyO+xIL0DNR03GjusJCfIepGxdBlqQD3 LGhveHzWndXWTTj4Nwsrl7GghG0Zvsm52a5VZcXpUZLWutvdZKaPONxwaoi+TXYRVTo6 U4AQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.141.165 with SMTP id rp5mr21481738pab.90.1383629255014; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 21:27:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.197.163 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 21:27:34 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 22:27:34 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Elecom WDC-433SU2M USB wireless dongle timeouts waiting for MCU to initialize From: PseudoCylon To: Koichiro IWAO , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 05:29:35 -0000 > Message: 1 > Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2013 03:35:44 +0900 > From: Koichiro IWAO > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Elecom WDC-433SU2M USB wireless dongle timeouts waiting for > MCU to initialize > Message-ID: <20131102183543.GA29930@icepick.vmeta.jp> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp > > > Hello, > > I'm trying to use Elecom WDC-433SU2M [1] possibly sold only in Japan. > This dongle has Ralink RT2870 chip. It is mentioned in user's manual [2]. > The manual is only available in Japanese but you can find > "Ralink RT2870" in it. I doubt run(4) supports your device, unfortunately. Even though the driver is named "Ralink RT2870", Ralink does not have any chipsets supports 11ac. I think your device uses MadiaTek's chipsets. (It seems those 2 companies have merged.) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 5 08:54:24 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEB74D1 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 08:54:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces+freebsd-questions=freebsd.org@skillpages-mailer.com) Received: from mtaout-250-pao.email7.skillpagesmail.com (mtaout-250-pao.email7.skillpagesmail.com [216.146.32.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2D1C26A6 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 08:54:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=MTA2; d=skillpagesmail.com; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:From:To:Sender:Reply-To:Date:List-Unsubscribe:Subject:Message-Id; i=no-reply@skillpagesmail.com; bh=kBNphGmRNSzXmJ5oQJ3DXwcfZQU=; b=Gjfu5ebYiNb3QrlZc912/uWJAprIudfRb4b6nZUp+L/BEFmmkK0AmnKeHWRcHI6efDOtm2Qkq9Je vN4WrBPm0fyKTwUBav7Ws1BHfd4e1dDbWCCBD0PrsOGsN3r5zOnD DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=MTA2; d=skillpagesmail.com; b=aXE/GoF2AAqGRYoFHv2cNZ/KMjWDPq/c3lVYuHwjSPf5B9OQznQDRaNXgZLOIHzu4GaEbwJHvADk l6aFNbqQ2yTr80E6S4/1/yO7eUI70TejbMtO7MHvkkRunG1yuVkC; From: Bob Alaong via SkillPages Team To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sender: Bob Alaong via SkillPages Team Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 08:46:13 X-Mailer: www.skillpages.com_PY X-EmailId: ZL+qpdJRTGOHhC5VjXozhw== Subject: Last chance... Your invitation from Bob Alaong is about to expire X-DynectEmail-Msg-Key: <20131105084614.170848C60005@mail6-07-pao> Message-Id: <20131105084614.263A2202F3@mail6-07-pao.dyndns.com> X-DynectEmail-Msg-Hash: i5UKlPjcTsq6M8EHhwPhxWDCseqisOhjK5QJ+wmHPA644s4eOZThKJmxjdrZRaIF+FS9Irn0tGm5YylCzecPmN/HII1cYGqIjX0OAzLq3KMMPiwKP9J1Cg== X-DynectEmail-X-Headers: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Bob Alaong via SkillPages Team List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 08:54:24 -0000 [1]SkillPages Hi, Bob Alaong is still waiting to connect with you. [2][bob.alaong?picture=SIZE90] [3]Bob Alaong Invite sent: October 22, 2013 [4]Continue This email was sent to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org. Please add 'no-reply@skillpages.com' to your contacts or safe senders list to ensure you keep receiving notifications in the future. If you do not want to receive these emails, you can [5]unsubscribe here. © 2013 SkillPages, Blackrock Business Park, Dublin, Ireland and 228 Hamilton Avenue, 3rd Floor, Palo Alto, CA 94301. [open-rate-v1.gif?emailMessageId=64bfaaa5-d251-4c63-8784-2e558d7a3387&e mailType=InviteSecondReminder&sdate=201311050846&utm_source=EmailInvite SecondReminder&utm_medium=Email&sendercc=IE] References 1. http://www.skillpages.com/i/landing/emailinvitelanding?signedParameters=E-6d7RxJG764OYvW1onkFn23u8_nDBnUNRLeYZgwV3Y=.eyJmcm9tIjogImVjOGE4NDNhLTRjM2ItZTMxMS1hMzI5LWM5MjcxYjUxZTJkYiIsICJwIjogMywgInRvIjogImJlYjI3Y2ViLTUzNWEtNWQ5OC1iOGFmLTEwZmU0MjAwOTQ5MSIsICJpc3N1ZWRfYXQiOiAxMzgzNjQxMTczLCAidmVyIjogIjEiLCAiZW1haWwiOiAiZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnNAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcifQ==&emailMessageId=64bfaaa5-d251-4c63-8784-2e558d7a3387&emailType=InviteSecondReminder&sdate=201311050846&utm_source=EmailInviteSecondReminder&utm_medium=Email&sendercc=IE&emailLinkType=Logo 2. http://www.skillpages.com/i/landing/emailinvitelanding?signedParameters=E-6d7RxJG764OYvW1onkFn23u8_nDBnUNRLeYZgwV3Y=.eyJmcm9tIjogImVjOGE4NDNhLTRjM2ItZTMxMS1hMzI5LWM5MjcxYjUxZTJkYiIsICJwIjogMywgInRvIjogImJlYjI3Y2ViLTUzNWEtNWQ5OC1iOGFmLTEwZmU0MjAwOTQ5MSIsICJpc3N1ZWRfYXQiOiAxMzgzNjQxMTczLCAidmVyIjogIjEiLCAiZW1haWwiOiAiZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnNAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcifQ==&emailMessageId=64bfaaa5-d251-4c63-8784-2e558d7a3387&emailType=InviteSecondReminder&sdate=201311050846&utm_source=EmailInviteSecondReminder&utm_medium=Email&sendercc=IE&emailLinkType=ProfileThumb 3. http://www.skillpages.com/i/landing/emailinvitelanding?signedParameters=E-6d7RxJG764OYvW1onkFn23u8_nDBnUNRLeYZgwV3Y=.eyJmcm9tIjogImVjOGE4NDNhLTRjM2ItZTMxMS1hMzI5LWM5MjcxYjUxZTJkYiIsICJwIjogMywgInRvIjogImJlYjI3Y2ViLTUzNWEtNWQ5OC1iOGFmLTEwZmU0MjAwOTQ5MSIsICJpc3N1ZWRfYXQiOiAxMzgzNjQxMTczLCAidmVyIjogIjEiLCAiZW1haWwiOiAiZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnNAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcifQ==&emailMessageId=64bfaaa5-d251-4c63-8784-2e558d7a3387&emailType=InviteSecondReminder&sdate=201311050846&utm_source=EmailInviteSecondReminder&utm_medium=Email&sendercc=IE&emailLinkType=ProfileName 4. http://www.skillpages.com/i/landing/emailinvitelanding?signedParameters=E-6d7RxJG764OYvW1onkFn23u8_nDBnUNRLeYZgwV3Y=.eyJmcm9tIjogImVjOGE4NDNhLTRjM2ItZTMxMS1hMzI5LWM5MjcxYjUxZTJkYiIsICJwIjogMywgInRvIjogImJlYjI3Y2ViLTUzNWEtNWQ5OC1iOGFmLTEwZmU0MjAwOTQ5MSIsICJpc3N1ZWRfYXQiOiAxMzgzNjQxMTczLCAidmVyIjogIjEiLCAiZW1haWwiOiAiZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnNAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcifQ==&emailMessageId=64bfaaa5-d251-4c63-8784-2e558d7a3387&emailType=InviteSecondReminder&sdate=201311050846&utm_source=EmailInviteSecondReminder&utm_medium=Email&sendercc=IE&emailLinkType=MainCallToAction 5. http://www.skillpages.com/i/account/unsubscribe?signedParameters=HfinEseCox-nrj9Vr9EbTNaPTjVvjdj62XR4j6CNcNY=.eyJpc3N1ZWRfYXQiOiAxMzgzNjQxMTczLCAicCI6IDAsICJ2ZXIiOiAiMSIsICJlbWFpbCI6ICJmcmVlYnNkLXF1ZXN0aW9uc0BmcmVlYnNkLm9yZyJ9&emailMessageId=64bfaaa5-d251-4c63-8784-2e558d7a3387&emailType=InviteSecondReminder&sdate=201311050846&utm_source=EmailInviteSecondReminder&utm_medium=Email&sendercc=IE&emailLinkType=Unsubscribe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 5 09:22:20 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C446D8B8 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 09:22:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vsjcfm@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vb0-x236.google.com (mail-vb0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c02::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86825284D for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 09:22:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id q12so2143060vbe.41 for ; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 01:22:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=e8OgTz+1HYmOELc0obvJ9VIQtxMN8jZrNBKsskFvgf8=; b=r+iHFryEypWIRqbAIUmwb8pVlGiaDGh2pkl/7ITPXNkLi3WHkCXxXT8a5g49Hm6i8j BP3+4L9MAeBaWSugQdEOkHJySqmj7GKXyoa3MYiA4YTsrh2iGcaFj92Ymv7KmUnuWczG CeWRtDfCmagQKtOtK7LWBSeXN87vffNRLF3sYwpFsgwPBs+HF9WId3WrrSpNY+3dDtrO E2q57h4Vd3EGOP0k4XiB4Qo6dzi61Nb0HQ3WNtGalkWOqqtLeV0uVYsmsRpjzfKjjV3R dJ1ZqJIuDv9/MYvA1tcpHQ9bLbusZkd9jZtgO1KKKQ4vatDNON9PSmXPtyYrEweZqt8f E3Hw== X-Received: by 10.220.184.70 with SMTP id cj6mr4979570vcb.23.1383643339221; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 01:22:19 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.58.107.74 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 01:21:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Anton Sayetsky Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 09:21:59 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ERROR - Cannot get GEOM tree To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 09:22:20 -0000 2013/11/4 Drew Tomlinson : > Nov 4 10:49:47 kernel: GEOM_STRIPE: Disk da0s1d removed from data. > Nov 4 10:49:47 kernel: GEOM_STRIPE: Device stripe/data deactivated. > Nov 4 10:49:53 kernel: GEOM_STRIPE: Disk da0s1d attached to data. > Nov 4 10:49:53 kernel: GEOM_STRIPE: Device stripe/data activated. > Nov 4 10:50:02 kernel: GEOM_STRIPE: Disk da0s1d removed from data. > Nov 4 10:50:02 kernel: GEOM_STRIPE: Device stripe/data deactivated. > Nov 4 10:50:05 kernel: GEOM_STRIPE: Disk da0s1d attached to data. This disk is dead. Unfortunately, you cannot recover any data from it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 5 12:32:45 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26AE2586 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 12:32:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from magnus@goransson.org) Received: from mail.goransson.org (mail.goransson.org [193.138.217.71]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD33523BE for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 12:32:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.goransson.org (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 3BAE6D9A; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 13:25:39 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on ns1.goransson.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received: from mail.goransson.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.goransson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5115D98 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 13:25:38 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 13:25:38 +0100 From: magnus@goransson.org To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: KVM/QEMU and Freebsd 9.1 or later Message-ID: <20d84fe0a517a131e97d4a781d7559ca@goransson.org> X-Sender: magnus@goransson.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.9.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 12:32:45 -0000 Hello! I want to run FreeBSD 9.2 under KVM/QEMU, but this is not working due to CPU problems. There seems to be a bug somewhere reading the forums tell me the problem should be fixed on KVM/QEMU side. For some reason unknown to me release 9.0 works with my current setup. Host information: - Dell server with Intel Xeon E5345 "Clovertown" CPU - Ubuntu LTS 12.04.03 - Linux kernel 3.2.0.55.65 - KVM/QEMU released with 12.04 LTS (aka Precise). Guest information - FreeBSD 9.2 The problem is that booting freezes the virtual machine after 1 second during the boot stage, do not get any boot menu at all. In forums i read that the problem was related to the features (sse4 etc) in the CPU type and model. I tried to change CPU from "core2duo" that was detected by KVM to something different but no luck. Please help me out, what is the problem..and how to solve it? Is this problem related to FreeBSD or KVM/QEMU? Why is it working with FreeBSD 9.0? /Best Regards Magnus From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 5 14:51:45 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32FD9143 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 14:51:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@rsle.net) Received: from mx1.rsle.net (mx1.rsle.net [IPv6:2607:ff40:b0b::4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9A022D40 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 14:51:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prometheus.rsle.net (UNKNOWN [206.162.203.14] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mx1.rsle.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rA5Epa1I016937 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 5 Nov 2013 09:51:38 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@rsle.net) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98 at antivirus.rsle.net Message-ID: <527905F3.6020501@rsle.net> Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 09:51:31 -0500 From: "R. Scott Evans" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrea Venturoli Subject: Re: [Half OT] Mavericks' Mail and SSL References: <52718078.8080702@netfence.it> <5272C747.8030805@rsle.net> <5273EF3F.8040307@netfence.it> <5273FD23.7090207@rsle.net> <527554CE.1040605@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: <527554CE.1040605@netfence.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (mx1.rsle.net [206.162.201.2]); Tue, 05 Nov 2013 09:51:39 -0500 (EST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 14:51:45 -0000 On 11/02/13 15:38, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > On 11/01/13 20:12, R. Scott Evans wrote: > >> I offer both SSL/TLS (465) and STARTTLS (587) to my users. In the Mac >> Mail I don't see an option for differentiating the connection security >> between SSL/TLS and STARTTLS other than specifying the port manually. >> There is a checkbox to Use SSL regardless of what port option is used >> (which I obviously have checked). >> >> Anyhow, I changed the port on my Mac to 465 and it still worked for me. >> Then again, I also just tried switching it back to the "default (25, >> 465, 587)" option for the port and it now works with that also, so I'm >> not sure what is going on? > > Thanks again. > Would you mind sending me your .cf file, your FreeBSD, Sendmail, and > OpenSSL version? > Any other useful config file? > > Are you using a self-signed certificate? > > bye & Thanks > av. I'm using a CA signed certificate. It's worth mentioning I also do SMTP Auth so will show the sasl version as well. I don't recall previously having any problems with Apple Mac's and iDevices when using self signed certs but I have had problems with Android devices. I've not tested this since I started using CA signed certs a few years ago though. I only edit the .mc and let sendmail generate the .cf from that so I've included the relevant portions of the .mc instead (below). -scott -------- # uname -rsim FreeBSD 9.2-STABLE amd64 GENERIC # # sendmail -d0.1 Version 8.14.7 Compiled with: DNSMAP LOG MAP_REGEX MATCHGECOS MILTER MIME7TO8 MIME8TO7 NAMED_BIND NETINET NETINET6 NETUNIX NEWDB NIS PIPELINING SASLv2 SCANF STARTTLS TCPWRAPPERS USERDB XDEBUG # # openssl version OpenSSL 0.9.8y 5 Feb 2013 # # pkg_info -Ix cyrus cyrus-sasl-2.1.26_2 RFC 2222 SASL (Simple Authentication and Security Layer) cyrus-sasl-saslauthd-2.1.26 SASL authentication server for cyrus-sasl2 # --------- my sendmail .mc file (edited) define(`confPRIVACY_FLAGS',``authwarnings,needexpnhelo,needmailhelo,needvrfyhelo,noexpn,novrfy,goaway'') FEATURE(`no_default_msa') DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=IPv4, Family=inet, M=A') DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=587, Name=MSA, M=E') dnl ### set SASL option ################################ define(`confDONT_BLAME_SENDMAIL',`GroupReadableSASLDBFile')dnl TRUST_AUTH_MECH(`LOGIN PLAIN GSSAPI DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5')dnl define(`confAUTH_MECHANISMS',`LOGIN PLAIN GSSAPI DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5')dnl dnl ### SSL ############################################# define(`confCACERT_PATH', `/etc/mail/SSL/')dnl define(`confCACERT', `/etc/mail/SSL/sf_bundle-g2.crt')dnl define(`confSERVER_CERT', `/etc/mail/SSL/mydomain.pem')dnl define(`confSERVER_KEY', `/etc/mail/SSL/mydomain.key')dnl DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtps, Name=TLSMTA, M=s')dnl dnl ### Enable IPv6 ###################################### DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=IPv6, Family=inet6, Modifiers=O') DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=MSA, Family=inet6, Port=587, M=Ea, Modifiers=O') dnl ###################################################### From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 5 16:37:43 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB327928 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 16:37:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@FreeBSD.org) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 800BB2462 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 16:37:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.43]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34A9B2218B; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 11:37:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from web3 ([10.202.2.213]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 05 Nov 2013 11:37:35 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:from:to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:references :subject:date; s=smtpout; bh=nv50PyWGI8AnwM80fiCl0pu5r0k=; b=mKT 1k0VaSZDCAa0VtMSwvDG0Z+08WlTnwkKhj9IMh28C/wnsKbH9Xhh1cx2qEXkaN7+ Mv9LBOWfGbgH87Z0C58NM0zAXz6xeBw2fW6c5iV73hkWt77iKvCwApFnb7WLZGKG wYeCmwG40TebUuuVuENNMxUtCiz19Z0vK9QkW2aQ= Received: by web3.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix, from userid 99) id 0A1B2110D1A; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 11:37:35 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <1383669454.21378.43329325.475E1FD0@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: njVWInaGr0jhM0t8VSSWjWYytkArJTsW7DpSV1Ix/Vwt 1383669454 From: Mark Felder To: "O. Hartmann" , FreeBSD Questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-d4893488 In-Reply-To: <20131102115534.71afaa03@thor.walstatt.dyndns.org> References: <20131102115534.71afaa03@thor.walstatt.dyndns.org> Subject: Re: CUPS and Epson Epson WF-3540 on FreeBSD 9.2/11.0-CURRENT Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 10:37:34 -0600 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 16:37:43 -0000 On Sat, Nov 2, 2013, at 4:55, O. Hartmann wrote: > > I'm about to purchase the Epson WF-3540DTWF and need to know whether > this printer is also capacle of being run on FreeBSD. > > What I can see so far on www.openprinting.org is that Epson offers > Linux BLOB drivers, wrapped as RPM or Debian DEB packages. There is no > mentioning of FreeBSD or any other UNIXiod OS but Linux. > > It is also mentioned on the www.sane-project.org website, that this > specific printer's scanner is working with Xsane/sane front- and > backend, but it is, again, Linux via the binary, non-free/open driver. > > My question is whether I have a chance to get this printer run on > FreeBSD as well. I intend to attach the printer as a network printer > via a FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT CUPS 1.5.2 server. > > Any advice or suggestion will be appreciated. > > Oliver > I don't think it's likely you'll find this working. I'd suggest you find a printer that can natively speak postscript and works with SANE without a proprietary driver. It's getting hard to find printers that can do this, though. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 5 18:53:15 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7136291 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 18:53:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from juris.kaminskis@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x22e.google.com (mail-wi0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 861E02E40 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 18:53:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f174.google.com with SMTP id cb5so2602449wib.1 for ; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 10:53:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=SgnHYG4/EHKPsDQgDEhnneohXRif7kHtrQj1uYoLVa0=; b=i6sEwBxPCLSxHF62wQpla7V/qMN1Pln6OAkmy0989muBUknzc2I1WOIllOiA60k9hb ge7sS/tVbm4087yvfrZWQ62yT0yCIzkcUKyWbMsL01CEg9tqSTPbwrxV49EM0vDXaXmO 3LHJukEyHTg37ujNjO22lYkmNI3TO+v3vJxTKMxx7DHR6cIkDKlmAT1H6LPcYcnzYDsM Oz5c6ySCujxqzL4DlFSlduSxKwGoJkbTiysWpx78+ghjJJbhlBba03zD5d0qbN2Rw9JD POljbGydCmtQDqT2eEcm0ZkehUseb20ISXwkOc9tgEgOwmWjF2/pr7Taj0rmOoWAkiqY +QlA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.8.98 with SMTP id q2mr17980554wia.26.1383677593321; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 10:53:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.185.101 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 10:53:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 20:53:13 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Share NTFS drive over NFS From: Juris Kaminskis To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 18:53:16 -0000 Hello, Wtih my export file /etc/exports: /home/ NFS loads with success the share, but when I try to use following entry: /home/juris/piltuve in the /var/log/messages I get: Nov 5 20:27:03 station mountd[847]: can't export /home/juris/piltuve/ Nov 5 20:27:03 station mountd[847]: bad exports list line /home/juris/piltuve/ I suspect it is because I have mounted NTFS on /home/juris/piltuve like this in /etc/fstab/ /dev/ada0s5 /home/juris/piltuve/ ntfs rw,mountprog=/usr/local/bin/ntfs With this I am stuck now. In the forums I read similar problem but also not solved: http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=31528 Permissions on /home/ and /home/juris/piltuve/ are equal thanks, Juris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 5 19:47:25 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 669462E3 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 19:47:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sdb@ssr.com) Received: from mailhost.ssr.com (mailhost.ssr.com [199.4.235.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1648021BF for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 19:47:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42821 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2013 20:32:25 -0000 Received: from pool-72-89-108-211.nycmny.east.verizon.net (HELO irelay.ssr.com) (sdb@72.89.108.211) by 199.4.235.5 with SMTP; 5 Nov 2013 20:32:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 2589 invoked by uid 103); 5 Nov 2013 19:03:17 -0000 Date: 5 Nov 2013 19:03:17 -0000 Message-ID: <20131105190317.2588.qmail@irelay.ssr.com> From: Scott Ballantyne To: Juris Kaminskis In-reply-to: (message from Juris Kaminskis on Tue, 5 Nov 2013 20:53:13 +0200) Subject: Re: Share NTFS drive over NFS References: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 19:47:25 -0000 > Wtih my export file /etc/exports: > > /home/ > > NFS loads with success the share, but when I try to use following entry: > > /home/juris/piltuve > > in the /var/log/messages I get: > > Nov 5 20:27:03 station mountd[847]: can't export /home/juris/piltuve/ > Nov 5 20:27:03 station mountd[847]: bad exports list line > /home/juris/piltuve/ > > I suspect it is because I have mounted NTFS on /home/juris/piltuve like > this in /etc/fstab/ > > /dev/ada0s5 /home/juris/piltuve/ ntfs > rw,mountprog=/usr/local/bin/ntfs > > With this I am stuck now. In the forums I read similar problem but also not > solved: > http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=31528 > > Permissions on /home/ and /home/juris/piltuve/ are equal > I've found that those errors are not reliable. I have exported filesystems right now that give those errors, but work just fine. I suggest you try to mount the filesystems on the clients to check for certain. For NTFS filesystems, I find FUSEFS helps tremendously. Best, Scott -- sdb@ssr.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 5 19:58:14 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20AC0C88; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 19:58:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D29F5226B; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 19:58:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.80.1) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1VdmlK-002yDy-GN>; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 20:58:06 +0100 Received: from f052015164.adsl.alicedsl.de ([78.52.15.164] helo=thor.walstatt.dyndns.org) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.80.1) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1VdmlK-003Vg8-Aq>; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 20:58:06 +0100 Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 20:58:01 +0100 From: "O. Hartmann" To: Mark Felder Subject: Re: CUPS and Epson Epson WF-3540 on FreeBSD 9.2/11.0-CURRENT Message-ID: <20131105205801.13be6358@thor.walstatt.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <1383669454.21378.43329325.475E1FD0@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <20131102115534.71afaa03@thor.walstatt.dyndns.org> <1383669454.21378.43329325.475E1FD0@webmail.messagingengine.com> Organization: FU Berlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/5M9G0wKwUyAdyJgrTOgNHxJ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Originating-IP: 78.52.15.164 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 19:58:14 -0000 --Sig_/5M9G0wKwUyAdyJgrTOgNHxJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 05 Nov 2013 10:37:34 -0600 Mark Felder wrote: > On Sat, Nov 2, 2013, at 4:55, O. Hartmann wrote: > >=20 > > I'm about to purchase the Epson WF-3540DTWF and need to know whether > > this printer is also capacle of being run on FreeBSD. > >=20 > > What I can see so far on www.openprinting.org is that Epson offers > > Linux BLOB drivers, wrapped as RPM or Debian DEB packages. There is > > no mentioning of FreeBSD or any other UNIXiod OS but Linux. > >=20 > > It is also mentioned on the www.sane-project.org website, that this > > specific printer's scanner is working with Xsane/sane front- and > > backend, but it is, again, Linux via the binary, non-free/open > > driver. > >=20 > > My question is whether I have a chance to get this printer run on > > FreeBSD as well. I intend to attach the printer as a network printer > > via a FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT CUPS 1.5.2 server. > >=20 > > Any advice or suggestion will be appreciated. > >=20 > > Oliver > >=20 >=20 > I don't think it's likely you'll find this working. I'd suggest you > find a printer that can natively speak postscript and works with SANE > without a proprietary driver. It's getting hard to find printers that > can do this, though. A pity. I think it is hard to find an ink-jet printer that "speaks" natively PS. Mots of them I saw have their proprietary BLOB driver managing the communication if they are multi-function-systems - mostly Linux. Thanks for the hint. Oliver --Sig_/5M9G0wKwUyAdyJgrTOgNHxJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSeU3NAAoJEOgBcD7A/5N8m1AIAM2k6qcr+86j8SR8gmqvQr1Q CMDfFtSybZvuZgI6Snce6rd7nelrb9g/ai9qDPvFcmykmj+7WXalxx2oOzUWboX7 0wgoCBhYXHQezaa30i4wFu707nBkgxQ4SWJqj6fqJWIn3HWSLM2Gx1U3wWRLCglF vuxXmow6Ss0RKFkSXagty+quAtXFfgHWBtqZ3Yk5NGyNDsxg7YVF/pTA5xu99n0h ouyoekDjbvxx5NHxGJnkOTsXMU3Lb7cK/9p//UfXQ6JYO4e8yOhAnvt7xKHdCCFD wTYB2B/kTK70GSj74PqembSW9ZAXzB1kNXiUM0mkzvKCb4FkEo3ZLDJDpWJykGE= =+Ssg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/5M9G0wKwUyAdyJgrTOgNHxJ-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 5 20:30:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13B977CD for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 20:30:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jan0sch@gmx.net) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D52A246E for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 20:30:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([92.226.16.77]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lh7PL-1W1Jqr0nzj-00oULF for ; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 21:29:58 +0100 Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 21:29:38 +0100 From: Jens Jahnke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 9.2 latest llvm upgrade does not compile [solved] Message-Id: <20131105212938.07984c70b3366d5e0d998b46@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <20131031115648.ccfc405591a80749f1fb74c8@gmx.net> References: <20131031115648.ccfc405591a80749f1fb74c8@gmx.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.2) X-Face: &?!P`87-36gaG)/K:yi&ixw=uy]y'?$vrc Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA512"; boundary="Signature=_Tue__5_Nov_2013_21_29_38_+0100_KpOWKOP.znlmjffe" X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Bl84/XRnHqLMn59+fEkYYTUu7raUCDDrh5pFLGYZXB+UIdjnaEQ uKlBuSxO1y10NWkk/SPSz0nAGLILW8wUXB8fBnTYExk7fETUpP403L0eJO+Q0gD2sTzs/QH 2ClxAgRpV96snpgx/nnn6YSsprKVvdRFWR7HB5Y80AVaBLHC+OESXan9ASVGq7b4k5k2tTr s7EOncA+Joq0GoaF8D9zg== X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 20:30:01 -0000 --Signature=_Tue__5_Nov_2013_21_29_38_+0100_KpOWKOP.znlmjffe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:56:48 +0100 Jens Jahnke wrote: JJ> the recent update for clang and llvm (3.3) does not compile on my JJ> main machine. I'm using 9.2 (updated from 9.1) and ports/portmaster. JJ>=20 JJ> Error message: JJ>=20 JJ> gmake[3]: Leaving directory JJ> `/usr/ports/devel/llvm33/work/llvm-3.3.src/projects/sample/tools' JJ> File "/usr/local/bin/sphinx-build", line 5, in from JJ> pkg_resources import load_entry_point File JJ> "build/bdist.freebsd-9.2-RELEASE-amd64/egg/pkg_resources.py", line JJ> 2805, in File JJ> "build/bdist.freebsd-9.2-RELEASE-amd64/egg/pkg_resources.py", line JJ> 696, in require File JJ> "build/bdist.freebsd-9.2-RELEASE-amd64/egg/pkg_resources.py", line JJ> 594, in resolve pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: markupsafe JJ> gmake: *** [man] Error 1 *** [post-build] Error code 2 JJ>=20 JJ> Stop in /usr/ports/devel/llvm33. JJ> *** [build] Error code 1 Just in case someone stumbles upon this error. I was able to solve it the following way: 1. deinstalled all python packages 2. reinstalled python 2.7 3. reinstalled previous py-packages 4. pip install Jinja2 5. reinstalled textproc/py-sphinx Afterwards I was able to compile llvm and clang updates. Regards, Jens --=20 05. Nebelung 2013, 21:27 Homepage : http://www.jan0sch.de That, that is, is. That, that is not, is not. That, that is, is not that, that is not. That, that is not, is not that, that is. --Signature=_Tue__5_Nov_2013_21_29_38_+0100_KpOWKOP.znlmjffe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) iQG8BAEBCgAGBQJSeVVFAAoJED2+SXzzbciGpgcM/jftAesh3uQtO4xN0ApA+nG/ BLJ/GX52Vfc5DsTXO5Dyw9ChSv8g8l2wQ7sU1hEtBa9SMSKISzzofJEuzI1BZePy AvVd36cGj98y2UTfJRiAM6euuEk/FMBUXaO8yu6pGog2wVQpr+vwJn1xUE52yjjG tRS3sgAKaG7gYzW6iW2tbvoXUgfdLXj4vYP1cZgN1HfZ2R2orq+K4zdQ3PEwjZ5R 6oQEIqZahXJlLW4PbvO0UxpcDNJu04K/vBUwoQEt3Xg5TOY75jgq5vp111Zky+lm F5pSbxCAmDW7tzWwhaHFk+BuvtHxheXXzIvKtdXR/QDSEga7iLxp2v7nebWKFTTs /RfDLgC3SEq/0EX8FdI18P/B91/Bzj4u5WSt6+Omiq43hXDcBqS/wFcBXwFSmRAG loXT8IBNFaSmen+cGT9xrrGfhY46/hw5okoVhjdamdm1jh7zkW4XY09MVscb1N1v qy3fd77vZRF6XHDuZXvt2i7QX3T/bEsgNBiLBvKG38WiG5dId3u3P/Lfi3LQWUuG RAkdPJYsC23yt1V/sikW =et3S -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Tue__5_Nov_2013_21_29_38_+0100_KpOWKOP.znlmjffe-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 5 20:32:24 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01AA7889 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 20:32:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aurfalien@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-x230.google.com (mail-pa0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D07C824BD for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 20:32:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id kq14so9415780pab.21 for ; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 12:32:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :to:mime-version; bh=5UloAHDDy5hZjxXieaj5AzX14/5HBPhMw7Q80/WTl/Q=; b=wq2peEf2icP18FsJ+C479EVcTTTax9kDInJIy97nL0X/p06je0E2p/s4WoFzc3lW08 7GxFspQIH7na0iPKbRA04Phz7P+2eXbr6CV+uyp2f5p3vmp31ZxCudVsSI5XQ/hsxa3L 62+DLHdXszdQcb/zXS7NDffvxrOK5M6i9H/ua8Ejwa5JyXBVyCKKFvvOiWIuc3NiaAQR Cntdz9Ch9F8jeXbDFjT1Z1MmYvIiTXPLxihfoIgiGczeV7ePL+CQIRWjnqsu3dGcrU5R bND/qBmkI1uwJZxYqCZghUpiJUd/a0A1mbgrD43NQZ/7rnyI6hyTlFZhOPxtwDdwHwPd wBKw== X-Received: by 10.68.137.103 with SMTP id qh7mr3684100pbb.175.1383683543315; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 12:32:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from briankrusicw.logan.tv ([64.17.255.138]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id qn1sm36447988pbc.34.2013.11.05.12.32.22 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 05 Nov 2013 12:32:22 -0800 (PST) From: aurfalien Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Running various OS's in jail Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 12:32:21 -0800 Message-Id: <24961C57-7514-4007-A9A2-166BC589334E@gmail.com> To: FreeBSD Mailing List Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 20:32:24 -0000 Hi, I've sort of a need to run Solaris in a jail.. Has any one done this or various other distros on FreeBSD => 9.1? Thanks in advance, - aurf From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 5 20:54:00 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C9B4C1 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 20:54:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aurfalien@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-x235.google.com (mail-pb0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1381725D3 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 20:54:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pb0-f53.google.com with SMTP id up7so7933244pbc.40 for ; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 12:53:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=p254miszXiCERDzenKLg6mGJkzAW7hmSm+ImlQOHhgw=; b=vpsUKVQtD6zPr5IMIaCrC7jSXE8bQTya1KlRgNg5cKveH1jIHm5OjHF3BTqeOCV7ze ZTKK1DwlJa0ZnNhncVTSb1LGzWwxouVkJDvnF0wum5/jRi7hUx7ZFzvOJeVx9fXmaUCU IBo4IC16Eh5MBAiTtOwcKnIlDZ0tSGxm9fZamstYz1tfBEqDidX8PKFKTS8Cv5pbxwf1 36SjTpmrZt/pV0UmwhqG+mQ1ngqIGA1eWrLtOVJRWGT0RImPSrp5dIMHNEvopoyZcx+O nulZ0yrd17VVgjsI210bysqLvIvsoW+8QMmK6SSbPqcaJoWEst+VWTvAf2hAd49cqENo 2QeQ== X-Received: by 10.67.4.136 with SMTP id ce8mr245541pad.158.1383684838751; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 12:53:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from briankrusicw.logan.tv ([64.17.255.138]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id x8sm36533859pbf.0.2013.11.05.12.53.58 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 05 Nov 2013 12:53:58 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Running various OS's in jail Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: aurfalien In-Reply-To: <17E2D86F-AEE6-445C-9BF6-CB59C1F02FE7@mac.com> Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 12:53:57 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <374EAB96-779C-40CD-8C13-62BBF75A38DA@gmail.com> References: <24961C57-7514-4007-A9A2-166BC589334E@gmail.com> <17E2D86F-AEE6-445C-9BF6-CB59C1F02FE7@mac.com> To: Charles Swiger X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 20:54:00 -0000 Well, I've a write up on FreeBSD 8 jailing Centos 5.5. Was hoping for something more recent. - aurf On Nov 5, 2013, at 12:52 PM, Charles Swiger wrote: > On Nov 5, 2013, at 12:32 PM, aurfalien wrote: >> I've sort of a need to run Solaris in a jail.. >=20 > Jails don't support running other operating systems. You'd need to = use a VM. >=20 > Regards, > --=20 > -Chuck >=20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 5 21:00:43 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D019520 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 21:00:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from st11p05mm-asmtp002.mac.com (st11p05mm-asmtpout005.mac.com [17.172.108.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8461263A for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 21:00:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [17.198.13.205] (unknown [17.198.13.205]) by st11p05mm-asmtp002.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.08(7.0.4.27.7) 64bit (built Aug 22 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0MVT00HBE6D3J460@st11p05mm-asmtp002.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 21:00:40 +0000 (GMT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.10.8794,1.0.431,0.0.0000 definitions=2013-11-05_07:2013-11-05,2013-11-05,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=1 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1308280000 definitions=main-1311050156 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) Subject: Re: Running various OS's in jail From: Charles Swiger In-reply-to: <374EAB96-779C-40CD-8C13-62BBF75A38DA@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 13:00:38 -0800 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Message-id: References: <24961C57-7514-4007-A9A2-166BC589334E@gmail.com> <17E2D86F-AEE6-445C-9BF6-CB59C1F02FE7@mac.com> <374EAB96-779C-40CD-8C13-62BBF75A38DA@gmail.com> To: aurfalien X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 21:00:43 -0000 Hi-- On Nov 5, 2013, at 12:53 PM, aurfalien wrote: > Well, I've a write up on FreeBSD 8 jailing Centos 5.5. You can run many Linux binaries in a FreeBSD jail via the Linux binary support, just as you can run them directly outside a jail. That's not the same thing as running the full OS including a different kernel; instead, FreeBSD emulates the Linux kernel and syscall layer; see: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/linux-emulation/article.html Regardsm -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 5 21:05:31 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3957D7FF for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 21:05:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aurfalien@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pd0-x232.google.com (mail-pd0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1104326B4 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 21:05:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pd0-f178.google.com with SMTP id x10so9082304pdj.23 for ; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 13:05:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=axthT1IzehPfgWRvEJRIDg1YmO1gaEuB2i2E9x973/g=; b=fA+T/cxTTv44MSmCmcaO/gNXeaxFh82AJaOdZOgSrr4cLjZ2szbO6rwTDnLFMjhLD+ Hk1s9TzxhTQhl6R+jqHZySLgcYGp7eDVnKiz4s0iutmzKvgxY4QHoVXijPNnLKWYGiAm chIyoTXg4eorFhi8DVgsm072wE/0ojL241qdkqTCPdVE6LakL7uRfF0GgD5qZmwikvZh NjB2rYIONt91XyGZtXdjjYiUVN48lvWt4xpySgn+cR3/Djwj4sPq5WAu0ZuRe1uR+iXe FjqGaK2OEvkbnf9tGi21qHsN8MtVvBP0A83zsy5J5+bwtb0wzgsRYpFVTkEHJLzOTnNd S8Jg== X-Received: by 10.68.110.196 with SMTP id ic4mr24510630pbb.84.1383685530442; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 13:05:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from briankrusicw.logan.tv ([64.17.255.138]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 7sm42637808paf.22.2013.11.05.13.05.29 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 05 Nov 2013 13:05:30 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Running various OS's in jail Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: aurfalien In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 13:05:29 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <30A58278-5C3E-4581-B9DF-87028A5EB20D@gmail.com> References: <24961C57-7514-4007-A9A2-166BC589334E@gmail.com> <17E2D86F-AEE6-445C-9BF6-CB59C1F02FE7@mac.com> <374EAB96-779C-40CD-8C13-62BBF75A38DA@gmail.com> To: Charles Swiger X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 21:05:31 -0000 This article doesn't sound like emulation; https://wiki.freebsd.org/Image/Linux/CentOS55 Or is it? I see one must enable the linux kernel module. - aurf On Nov 5, 2013, at 1:00 PM, Charles Swiger wrote: > Hi-- >=20 > On Nov 5, 2013, at 12:53 PM, aurfalien wrote: >> Well, I've a write up on FreeBSD 8 jailing Centos 5.5. >=20 > You can run many Linux binaries in a FreeBSD jail via the Linux > binary support, just as you can run them directly outside a jail. >=20 > That's not the same thing as running the full OS including a different > kernel; instead, FreeBSD emulates the Linux kernel and syscall layer; = see: >=20 > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/linux-emulation/article.html >=20 > Regardsm > --=20 > -Chuck >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 5 21:10:28 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 666229A7 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 21:10:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from st11p05mm-asmtp002.mac.com (st11p05mm-asmtpout005.mac.com [17.172.108.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3998D26FA for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 21:10:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [17.198.13.205] (unknown [17.198.13.205]) by st11p05mm-asmtp002.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.08(7.0.4.27.7) 64bit (built Aug 22 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0MVT00IVS6T40J50@st11p05mm-asmtp002.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 21:10:19 +0000 (GMT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.10.8794,1.0.431,0.0.0000 definitions=2013-11-05_07:2013-11-05,2013-11-05,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1308280000 definitions=main-1311050156 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) Subject: Re: Running various OS's in jail From: Charles Swiger In-reply-to: <30A58278-5C3E-4581-B9DF-87028A5EB20D@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 13:10:16 -0800 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Message-id: <038C446B-29D7-418E-BA82-B509131D99DE@mac.com> References: <24961C57-7514-4007-A9A2-166BC589334E@gmail.com> <17E2D86F-AEE6-445C-9BF6-CB59C1F02FE7@mac.com> <374EAB96-779C-40CD-8C13-62BBF75A38DA@gmail.com> <30A58278-5C3E-4581-B9DF-87028A5EB20D@gmail.com> To: aurfalien X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 21:10:28 -0000 Hi-- On Nov 5, 2013, at 1:05 PM, aurfalien wrote: > This article doesn't sound like emulation; > > https://wiki.freebsd.org/Image/Linux/CentOS55 > > Or is it? > > I see one must enable the linux kernel module. Exactly. A VM would run the CentOS Linux kernel directly; a FreeBSD jail is using the FreeBSD kernel and its Linux emulation layer to host the CentOS userland binaries. Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 5 21:12:57 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06C7AB4C for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 21:12:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from st11p05mm-asmtp002.mac.com (st11p05mm-asmtpout005.mac.com [17.172.108.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0F0A2754 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 21:12:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [17.198.13.205] (unknown [17.198.13.205]) by st11p05mm-asmtp002.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.08(7.0.4.27.7) 64bit (built Aug 22 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0MVT00D3I45A4X90@st11p05mm-asmtp002.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 20:12:47 +0000 (GMT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.10.8794,1.0.431,0.0.0000 definitions=2013-11-05_07:2013-11-05,2013-11-05,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1308280000 definitions=main-1311050144 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) Subject: Re: CUPS and Epson Epson WF-3540 on FreeBSD 9.2/11.0-CURRENT From: Charles Swiger In-reply-to: <20131105205801.13be6358@thor.walstatt.dyndns.org> Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 12:12:46 -0800 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Message-id: References: <20131102115534.71afaa03@thor.walstatt.dyndns.org> <1383669454.21378.43329325.475E1FD0@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20131105205801.13be6358@thor.walstatt.dyndns.org> To: "O. Hartmann" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 21:12:57 -0000 Hi-- On Nov 5, 2013, at 11:58 AM, O. Hartmann = wrote: >> I don't think it's likely you'll find this working. I'd suggest you >> find a printer that can natively speak postscript and works with SANE >> without a proprietary driver. It's getting hard to find printers that >> can do this, though. >=20 > A pity. > I think it is hard to find an ink-jet printer that "speaks" natively > PS. Mots of them I saw have their proprietary BLOB driver managing the > communication if they are multi-function-systems - mostly Linux. It costs money to license a real PostScript interpreter from Adobe, = which means that the cheaper inkjets won't pony up for that capability. It looks like the Lexmark Pro4000 and the HP OfficeJet 276dw are sanely = priced PostScript-capable inkjets, but there are literally hundreds of laser = printers around which have native PostScript support, and their cost-per-page = usually is much more reasonable than inkjets end up being. Regards, --=20 -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 5 21:14:27 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 166FCD0A for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 21:14:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@FreeBSD.org) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEF212780 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 21:14:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.43]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BB8121D6F for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 16:14:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from web3 ([10.202.2.213]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 05 Nov 2013 16:14:25 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:from:to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:subject:date:in-reply-to :references; s=smtpout; bh=5klqTQuHXW4PvBeJuHDAuV7h6Ac=; b=q3eWB g0srifzeMrfcFTtc6d2W7g7vvBPSDw3SZhiSSmKhwh7HdDcfD5v4ZXveucUcLJP7 GkUI1fUO27qFGv0AUpZxRDkI99w7D15RIldKGhzLf0TeOsxs4AaxGr1I+TDivrwQ osv8eO1D7D3MqXQIDWx9Ult77UxMrUuvziLuUI= Received: by web3.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix, from userid 99) id 1B1F711184C; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 16:14:25 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <1383686065.20319.43457061.419768E8@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: HmBM+4y+dp2LgNFgtSLgKILjDmwsvZhKMKittQhDzyj6 1383686065 From: Mark Felder To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-d4893488 Subject: Re: CUPS and Epson Epson WF-3540 on FreeBSD 9.2/11.0-CURRENT Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 15:14:25 -0600 In-Reply-To: References: <20131102115534.71afaa03@thor.walstatt.dyndns.org> <1383669454.21378.43329325.475E1FD0@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20131105205801.13be6358@thor.walstatt.dyndns.org> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 21:14:27 -0000 On Tue, Nov 5, 2013, at 14:12, Charles Swiger wrote: > Hi-- > > On Nov 5, 2013, at 11:58 AM, O. Hartmann > wrote: > >> I don't think it's likely you'll find this working. I'd suggest you > >> find a printer that can natively speak postscript and works with SANE > >> without a proprietary driver. It's getting hard to find printers that > >> can do this, though. > > > > A pity. > > I think it is hard to find an ink-jet printer that "speaks" natively > > PS. Mots of them I saw have their proprietary BLOB driver managing the > > communication if they are multi-function-systems - mostly Linux. > > It costs money to license a real PostScript interpreter from Adobe, which > means that the cheaper inkjets won't pony up for that capability. > > It looks like the Lexmark Pro4000 and the HP OfficeJet 276dw are sanely > priced > PostScript-capable inkjets, but there are literally hundreds of laser > printers > around which have native PostScript support, and their cost-per-page > usually > is much more reasonable than inkjets end up being. > Not to mention the new fancy thing are LED printers which are superceding laser printers. I didn't even know they existed until recently. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 5 21:26:11 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71B4610F for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 21:26:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from juris.kaminskis@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-x22f.google.com (mail-wg0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D1BC2848 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 21:26:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f47.google.com with SMTP id c11so4006129wgh.2 for ; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 13:26:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=e9UEJQELwmk0/OOOnPPpKN/UButB9lHtDDhLEmAeP5o=; b=EoZDE9u4+EKG7V7Uo9HXTmngbbIq9jjvDi9NlkIb7kROHXk0xgWglOlYSuAdEMpHkN /9QT6wc53LGExEzoL7gm5UvMGFnO3zYARgJtrrNAVAhJkvTBm9bc7e5k5eUvG3L3niiO hISrUELnl5kLJnlSF8M8DYHJHivT5z0uY1EXAh4LXKG1fX+aT7Pb3LgTECVtsveM/7vb /DsFl7830tE1zfPxy0XsFhsY5UddyUocUZUb/X8OJ+aTc/EfX1ek1J+lijRjdcMd4FbC 3MfyZojhEZN2llvs7EF4nv8nwOvSXlmvikfJGbFhTqet/NTmYs/HbN13fVOsMtO9KGPt kowg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.211.237 with SMTP id nf13mr18396317wic.55.1383686769304; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 13:26:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.185.101 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 13:26:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.185.101 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 13:26:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20131105190317.2588.qmail@irelay.ssr.com> References: <20131105190317.2588.qmail@irelay.ssr.com> Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 23:26:09 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Share NTFS drive over NFS From: Juris Kaminskis To: Scott Ballantyne Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 21:26:11 -0000 > > I've found that those errors are not reliable. I have exported > filesystems right now that give those errors, but work just fine. I > suggest you try to mount the filesystems on the clients to check for > certain. Showmount -e does not give me anything and connecting from client gives permission denied error, so this is still valid error > For NTFS filesystems, I find FUSEFS helps tremendously. I have fusefs-ntfs installed and my ntfs share works well on host From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 5 21:28:41 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ED031C8; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 21:28:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr7.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr7.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 865D7286A; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 21:28:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.erewhon.net (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr7.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id rA5LScDK059903; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 22:28:38 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.erewhon.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 612BE12313; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 22:28:38 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 22:28:38 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: "O. Hartmann" Subject: Re: CUPS and Epson Epson WF-3540 on FreeBSD 9.2/11.0-CURRENT Message-ID: <20131105212838.GA68966@slackbox.erewhon.net> References: <20131102115534.71afaa03@thor.walstatt.dyndns.org> <1383669454.21378.43329325.475E1FD0@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20131105205801.13be6358@thor.walstatt.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131105205801.13be6358@thor.walstatt.dyndns.org> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 21:28:41 -0000 --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 08:58:01PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote: > On Tue, 05 Nov 2013 10:37:34 -0600 > Mark Felder wrote: >=20 > > I don't think it's likely you'll find this working. I'd suggest you > > find a printer that can natively speak postscript and works with SANE > > without a proprietary driver. It's getting hard to find printers that > > can do this, though. >=20 > A pity. > I think it is hard to find an ink-jet printer that "speaks" natively > PS. Mots of them I saw have their proprietary BLOB driver managing the > communication if they are multi-function-systems - mostly Linux. While PostScript is probably the best choice, if the printer speaks PCL you can probably get it to work. When in doubt, check the openprinting database [http://www.openprinting.org/printers]. If you see a printer that is described as "host-based", avoid it like the plague! This means they ripped all the smarts (such as it is, and what there is of it) out of a printer and put it in the usually windows-only driver. := -( Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://rsmith.home.xs4all.nl/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) iEUEARECAAYFAlJ5YwYACgkQEnfvsMMhpyXG+wCdF36cDrquu67Bk15Kb2WofebI fi4AlRUQKmzrIshvSuUDpES1/7tQY6o= =CtYj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 5 21:33:29 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 698512FD for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 21:33:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from four.harrisons@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-we0-x229.google.com (mail-we0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 016B728D6 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 21:33:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id q58so4162631wes.0 for ; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 13:33:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=u8rYhLG3q75ldkq2qRApaekJN93w1zIEHmrGEiur/Kk=; b=c7r/FATxPpRV7udc1rBxDTAuounwLWYZaLYbOzLK0jg3Eo+K1U2zDBvPaw6bbsjwID MDLS/CK8m1VtTq3OKNnCrUq/cuorWC6u+QGqVZ2bSIBP6FmlvZ8sS8J8uiSw/YnsVQcP /YpdXYjwmzdb7Pz2z7fZyTvAGHF5sy288j8Q4s0gMjfh29owhD9OmUFAWoOo0EEmd8CF xVBV0d7xyWHof+QnFBcMGzEV3lyOfZ3MddyskN4Cql9/wwyfkUB32L/MFOZ60KdKK1Yz Mrwj2cU6tkqpiox0Hi9fVGO/MLeHm3EYmbyIOm9myzeQlodO8aMxKrAuJeOkE17xt/PT 0U4g== X-Received: by 10.194.237.226 with SMTP id vf2mr3233104wjc.58.1383687206255; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 13:33:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (client-86-31-19-141.midd.adsl.virginm.net. [86.31.19.141]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fr4sm18141353wib.0.2013.11.05.13.33.24 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 05 Nov 2013 13:33:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by localhost (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 06 Nov 2013 21:32:56 +0000 From: Peter Harrison Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 21:32:56 +0000 To: Rod Person Subject: Re: Chromium rendering problem Message-ID: <20131106213256.GA86286@thinkpad.piggybox> References: <20131029203647.GA3728@thinkpad.piggybox> <20131029205603.137c2eb6@avatar.davids-website.com> <20131031201101.GA3456@thinkpad.piggybox> <5273D053.9070404@rodperson.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5273D053.9070404@rodperson.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) Cc: Craig Whipp , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 21:33:29 -0000 Friday, 1 November 2013 at 12:01:23 -0400, Rod Person said: > On 11/1/2013 11:57 AM, Craig Whipp wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Peter Harrison > > wrote: > >> Is anyone else seeing this? > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Peter. > >> > > Yes. I have this exact problem, too. > > > > - Craig > > I also have this issue and I have never installed Chromium before, I had just installed it on 9.2 release to give it a try since the downfall of Opera. > > -- > Rod So just on the off-chance I rebuilt Chromium using gcc rather than clang (set using make config) and that seems to have fixed the problem. Not sure why though. Peter. > > So little pains do the vulgar take in the investigation of truth, accepting readily the first story that comes to hand. > -Thucydides > History of The Peloponnesian War, 432BC > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 5 21:51:12 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5C37802 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 21:51:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@shaneware.biz) Received: from ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net [IPv6:2001:44b8:8060:ff02:300:1:6:4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50D1B29BE for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 21:51:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ppp118-210-126-13.lns20.adl2.internode.on.net (HELO leader.local) ([118.210.126.13]) by ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 06 Nov 2013 08:21:11 +1030 Message-ID: <5279684C.6070901@ShaneWare.Biz> Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 08:21:08 +1030 From: Shane Ambler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: aurfalien Subject: Re: Running various OS's in jail References: <24961C57-7514-4007-A9A2-166BC589334E@gmail.com> <17E2D86F-AEE6-445C-9BF6-CB59C1F02FE7@mac.com> <374EAB96-779C-40CD-8C13-62BBF75A38DA@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <374EAB96-779C-40CD-8C13-62BBF75A38DA@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 21:51:12 -0000 On 06/11/2013 07:23, aurfalien wrote: > Well, I've a write up on FreeBSD 8 jailing Centos 5.5. > > Was hoping for something more recent. > > - aurf > On Nov 5, 2013, at 12:52 PM, Charles Swiger wrote: > >> On Nov 5, 2013, at 12:32 PM, aurfalien wrote: >>> I've sort of a need to run Solaris in a jail.. >> >> Jails don't support running other operating systems. You'd need to use a VM. If you are running 10.0 then have a look at bhyve.org - it only works on recent hardware and is known to support freebsd openbsd and linux There is mention that 9.x can support bhyve and I think the EuroBSDCon video gives details of how to do that. If that is too young then you should look at qemu or virtualbox From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 5 21:52:42 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BAA48A5 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 21:52:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from st11p05mm-asmtp003.mac.com (st11p05mm-asmtpout003.mac.com [17.172.108.248]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03A7F29D7 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 21:52:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [17.198.13.205] (unknown [17.198.13.205]) by st11p05mm-asmtp003.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.08(7.0.4.27.7) 64bit (built Aug 22 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0MVT007AR5ZFRD50@st11p05mm-asmtp003.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 20:52:29 +0000 (GMT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.10.8794,1.0.431,0.0.0000 definitions=2013-11-05_07:2013-11-05,2013-11-05,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1308280000 definitions=main-1311050153 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) Subject: Re: Running various OS's in jail From: Charles Swiger In-reply-to: <24961C57-7514-4007-A9A2-166BC589334E@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 12:52:27 -0800 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Message-id: <17E2D86F-AEE6-445C-9BF6-CB59C1F02FE7@mac.com> References: <24961C57-7514-4007-A9A2-166BC589334E@gmail.com> To: aurfalien X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 21:52:42 -0000 On Nov 5, 2013, at 12:32 PM, aurfalien wrote: > I've sort of a need to run Solaris in a jail.. Jails don't support running other operating systems. You'd need to use a VM. Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 5 23:50:22 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9444CD6; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 23:50:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51EF6207A; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 23:50:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.80.1) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1VdqO4-003yrU-JH>; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 00:50:20 +0100 Received: from g231205187.adsl.alicedsl.de ([92.231.205.187] helo=thor.walstatt.dyndns.org) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.80.1) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1VdqO4-003kat-EV>; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 00:50:20 +0100 Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 00:50:19 +0100 From: "O. Hartmann" To: Roland Smith Subject: Re: CUPS and Epson Epson WF-3540 on FreeBSD 9.2/11.0-CURRENT Message-ID: <20131106005019.6b4514f8@thor.walstatt.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20131105212838.GA68966@slackbox.erewhon.net> References: <20131102115534.71afaa03@thor.walstatt.dyndns.org> <1383669454.21378.43329325.475E1FD0@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20131105205801.13be6358@thor.walstatt.dyndns.org> <20131105212838.GA68966@slackbox.erewhon.net> Organization: FU Berlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/Lv2TPlyZwhFXeRIwgpek.6u"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Originating-IP: 92.231.205.187 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 23:50:22 -0000 --Sig_/Lv2TPlyZwhFXeRIwgpek.6u Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 5 Nov 2013 22:28:38 +0100 Roland Smith wrote: > On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 08:58:01PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote: > > On Tue, 05 Nov 2013 10:37:34 -0600 > > Mark Felder wrote: > >=20 > > > I don't think it's likely you'll find this working. I'd suggest > > > you find a printer that can natively speak postscript and works > > > with SANE without a proprietary driver. It's getting hard to find > > > printers that can do this, though. > >=20 > > A pity. > > I think it is hard to find an ink-jet printer that "speaks" natively > > PS. Mots of them I saw have their proprietary BLOB driver managing > > the communication if they are multi-function-systems - mostly Linux. >=20 > While PostScript is probably the best choice, if the printer speaks > PCL you can probably get it to work. When in doubt, check the > openprinting database [http://www.openprinting.org/printers]. There are only a few ink jet printers that support PostScript and they have been benchmarked not very positive (expensive, high cost-per-page relation et cetera). I also looked at openprinting.org for those printers I put into the circle of choices.=20 >=20 > If you see a printer that is described as "host-based", avoid it like > the plague! This means they ripped all the smarts (such as it is, and > what there is of it) out of a printer and put it in the usually > windows-only driver. :-( yes, those "dead silicon" plastique printers are not very flexible and I avoid them like the plaque. ;-) >=20 > Roland Oliver --Sig_/Lv2TPlyZwhFXeRIwgpek.6u Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSeYQ7AAoJEOgBcD7A/5N82RcH/0YCw87DzSOjOx569JkAeps4 rJQ4vLqpZ5cyesxgDo3jXEymC5fxv2ePL1jK+QUmc5Yfa9umeHkzBUZesM5TozJc sCilKnMacp+mtqTfTKlyPbhT6vW83v92v5y8E58D+d/I7ez0nooLdwCDwN1sTWlQ TTkImbdlhiHYsaI9ZOVBzNS9vvIPtZK9xFvyI4DDQfKY6nmoPIyH9P0pI//0aeQ8 25p2YGT11vPYmoXu/1TkavA0aeXIrULk+rGDbT/aWoZlKNAk27owbMSqBuzu/eJN XxCxPPbHKHFP6MWyl0ZMjEmwiu0/z5iLZt7XlUsI2FUDnQ/XvQ6m7GDzXHhIFNA= =yMcr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/Lv2TPlyZwhFXeRIwgpek.6u-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 6 05:12:03 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 931668B8; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 05:12:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54F91221F; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 05:12:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-117-74.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.117.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41BC5278A7; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 06:06:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id rA655xb3001949; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 06:05:59 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 06:05:59 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Mark Felder Subject: Re: CUPS and Epson Epson WF-3540 on FreeBSD 9.2/11.0-CURRENT Message-Id: <20131106060559.5dcad829.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <1383669454.21378.43329325.475E1FD0@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <20131102115534.71afaa03@thor.walstatt.dyndns.org> <1383669454.21378.43329325.475E1FD0@webmail.messagingengine.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "O. Hartmann" , FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 05:12:03 -0000 On Tue, 05 Nov 2013 10:37:34 -0600, Mark Felder wrote: > On Sat, Nov 2, 2013, at 4:55, O. Hartmann wrote: > > > > I'm about to purchase the Epson WF-3540DTWF and need to know whether > > this printer is also capacle of being run on FreeBSD. > > > > [...] > > I don't think it's likely you'll find this working. I'd suggest you find > a printer that can natively speak postscript and works with SANE without > a proprietary driver. It's getting hard to find printers that can do > this, though. Sadly, your summary seems to be correct. Regarding printers: It's good if they speak _any_ of the established standard printer languages. CUPS offers access to a lot of means to get printers working. If the printer manufacturer offers a PPD file, you're usually good. Other possibilities are printers that speak PCL, PS (as you mentioned) or, for newer models, they should use PDF. All those formats can be easily used with CUPS, and if required, without CUPS. Interestingly, it's still possible to find inkpee printers that seem to satisfy that kind of requirement. Regarding scanners: Many scanners use a kind of "standard SCSI-derived data protocol". I've been successfully using a no-brand SCSI scanner without any drivers (!), just with bare SANE, which detected everything automatically. My dying HP ScanJet also works. But I've seen more than enough scanners that won't work, or where specific "in-between models" won't work; if I remember correctly, Canon LideScan 20 and 40 worked, but the 35 I was presented didn't have any support (totoally different proprietary protocol). It's still not impossible to get a usable scanner that is fully supported. But the _combination_ of scanner and printer... I'm currently struggling with the same problem. For a specific use case, I need to find such a MFP (multi-function printer, haha) where I can print in color with the inkpee machanism by using CUPS _and_ use the scanner on top with SANE with maybe interfaces to LibreOffice and Gimp (because xscanimage is too professional for some users). It doesn't even matter if the printer needs to be locally connected via USB, instead of offering network connection (wired preferred, wireless _maybe_ acceptable) as all normal printers do. If this thread should come up with a printer model that satisfies those requirements, that would be great. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 6 06:28:37 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4FBD8D8 for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 06:28:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BB7724F1 for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 06:28:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rA66STwR066540; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 23:28:29 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id rA66SSP1066537; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 23:28:28 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 23:28:28 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Charles Swiger Subject: Re: CUPS and Epson Epson WF-3540 on FreeBSD 9.2/11.0-CURRENT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20131102115534.71afaa03@thor.walstatt.dyndns.org> <1383669454.21378.43329325.475E1FD0@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20131105205801.13be6358@thor.walstatt.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 05 Nov 2013 23:28:29 -0700 (MST) Cc: "O. Hartmann" , FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 06:28:37 -0000 On Tue, 5 Nov 2013, Charles Swiger wrote: > Hi-- > > On Nov 5, 2013, at 11:58 AM, O. Hartmann wrote: >>> I don't think it's likely you'll find this working. I'd suggest you >>> find a printer that can natively speak postscript and works with SANE >>> without a proprietary driver. It's getting hard to find printers that >>> can do this, though. >> >> A pity. >> I think it is hard to find an ink-jet printer that "speaks" natively >> PS. Mots of them I saw have their proprietary BLOB driver managing the >> communication if they are multi-function-systems - mostly Linux. > > It costs money to license a real PostScript interpreter from Adobe, which > means that the cheaper inkjets won't pony up for that capability. Ghostscript supports a number of native inkjet page description languages. I have a couple of older Epson inkjets that I think Ghostscript will drive directly. > It looks like the Lexmark Pro4000 and the HP OfficeJet 276dw are sanely priced > PostScript-capable inkjets, but there are literally hundreds of laser printers > around which have native PostScript support, and their cost-per-page usually > is much more reasonable than inkjets end up being. Maybe those models are fine, but generally higher-end inkjets are disproportionately priced. And because few people buy them, those extra features are not heavily tested. Relevant articles: This one shows setting up a print filter with Ghostscript: http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/lpdprinting.html And this talks about the value of a used office laser printer: http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/usedlasers.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 6 08:12:10 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05FD973F for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 08:12:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qe0-x230.google.com (mail-qe0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c02::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B99672A20 for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 08:12:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qe0-f48.google.com with SMTP id d4so5782394qej.7 for ; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 00:12:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=tkFoVOkU7TPgeEbvjpjND+qhfxXgBsnsA1VlspBQeoY=; b=tphUQem9P6f8jNPrfcBfMLq4bbuK/DAduHS5/uH0tB4FzSfrgronG8gmg7UYeLkjhf 6Fzoa8CsFBkm/ptF9Qv2jvIlwOYKk2qr3NFmavNZn6W4E2EIpgdjzagQGg+Hg4xWQhRp 9zOJ3FoxsEDjgGZRimCeAXQ8jHiAQN/Btg2Uo81Nj2uWvd58UlZJug1y8njGZAOgqw09 3Ope5qkAlXApnSlQ1j9Jqllhb/djmcIdDLU1AjKwZvmAvBNUaBu+bXUef5gVpxFhwtJ5 LNoMSy87cKbqNt3us75q41rbeCYAk9w1vcXjuYt8eluObHauxFZttW/bkosYQ4t0RIez eCJQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.49.117.196 with SMTP id kg4mr2692763qeb.21.1383725528798; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 00:12:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.55.77 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 00:12:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20131105190317.2588.qmail@irelay.ssr.com> Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 08:12:08 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Share NTFS drive over NFS From: krad To: Juris Kaminskis Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 08:12:10 -0000 have you tried putting /home/juris/piltuve/ in the exports file? from what i remember NFS only exports the file systems you list and /home/juris/piltuve/ isnt listed as /home is a different file system in your case. You might also need the -alldirs flag On 5 November 2013 21:26, Juris Kaminskis wrote: > > > > I've found that those errors are not reliable. I have exported > > filesystems right now that give those errors, but work just fine. I > > suggest you try to mount the filesystems on the clients to check for > > certain. > > Showmount -e does not give me anything and connecting from client gives > permission denied error, so this is still valid error > > > For NTFS filesystems, I find FUSEFS helps tremendously. > > I have fusefs-ntfs installed and my ntfs share works well on host > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 6 09:04:03 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8118A29 for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 09:04:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from juris.kaminskis@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-x22f.google.com (mail-wg0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 707AD2CF2 for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 09:04:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f47.google.com with SMTP id c11so4512123wgh.26 for ; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 01:04:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Tw4UQuU5RMGT1j3z+FC63aqpiuY0jbPTpaFffkIovLY=; b=G/TB93Bh1bOQfBYk0NhLOqJ87MM/smPSWXqNfO3p5pMCPiCz0OREJF5ZGqi0CrhMQ5 CgJvxyue7v9rODav4cEXC1HQ536TlpeGrfCnQHn4eU++HRV5UZY2fkjQtoPYgJ1VQIpl N6MfP99u3gG1RJ6xo0Qb/iHw8CnemKPW8INUTFQdXOOvuUnCsNDNjoNSd01zwmvOSunl Ex75wO3NCg2JbEYNsqzygwhxreLhMLQSMprSfDOJAvOwKbRa46l1xazaGgnJkIOSafi+ O/l4NcVJaR8s8YOLmQLHAGjKqWaSpwsdgexcRHY7nOI3Poo5qpcipbDPlOez0A0mj1K7 ddUg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.8.98 with SMTP id q2mr1602318wia.26.1383728641841; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 01:04:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.185.101 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 01:04:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.185.101 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 01:04:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20131105190317.2588.qmail@irelay.ssr.com> Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 11:04:01 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Share NTFS drive over NFS From: Juris Kaminskis To: krad Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-13 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 09:04:03 -0000 2013. gada 6. nov. 10:12 "krad" rakst=EEja: > > have you tried putting /home/juris/piltuve/ in the exports file? That is exactly what i did and encounter error I mention earlier > from what i remember NFS only exports the file systems you list and /home/juris/piltuve/ isnt listed as /home is a different file system in your case. > > You might also need the -alldirs flag I can try /home/ -alldirs. Without the flag folder /home/juris/piltuve was blank on Client From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 6 09:23:22 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88D25272 for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 09:23:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from eu1sys200aog118.obsmtp.com (eu1sys200aog118.obsmtp.com [207.126.144.145]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0A532E6E for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 09:23:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f50.google.com ([74.125.82.50]) (using TLSv1) by eu1sys200aob118.postini.com ([207.126.147.11]) with SMTP ID DSNKUnoKgjYge1ISrILpJ8MbJeGStkoKi9gg@postini.com; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 09:23:22 UTC Received: by mail-wg0-f50.google.com with SMTP id n12so4668782wgh.5 for ; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 01:23:14 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:message-id:to:subject:reply-to; bh=0vSdanCr9W5DzSViZkpzpWu3DIzHF2O1k3ua9s6jqYM=; b=dg5LqVTsGpEh7AqfxEN6hoOI/G6MNNwid/Bj1jk16R4dzryL8uh8x3sdQn23H1fOzv 0ae0N5MsdrI6X4bX6pmoCAgMKyNGuBvqqcxUKpg16C1jmU8AIc5qP9YuPwgrD7cW255W NWFG80AY2J2RK6yVvyKsshvnVEaXxLfAGdi6xiYklEAIQq5f7SKd+bGoMh3m29j4YLJB +AjZhmj7jgv6O86aw9ReWjEzNsjlMULOWrbTI65P57rs9kkNr5CjhPBi4wLdPlTNR638 nEE2nQQXxEhlBBd1FovzOe4NtFeNLW9zmMnqwzM+lEoyW/hTq+U1I3jNW9bwyH7tJBn+ vjkw== X-Received: by 10.180.38.99 with SMTP id f3mr1615314wik.40.1383729363637; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 01:16:03 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnPkJdqLilhktwo5whTqFXaYwfIUjT3EL5LF4BdXTfbWXd9swohmkxru8ELjEkCQ2KAFFyY82yovMPSRXxiU/s8h8Fcmc9PNRioXbPdudMb0hqjgFckWsf7lebjDISIChXQfj/x0d46k7el+Vt73lP9HtqBkv+R27jUwEjssO5mArAak9w0yCs2JvybVIYtul3bSzHk X-Received: by 10.180.38.99 with SMTP id f3mr1615310wik.40.1383729363557; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 01:16:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk. [137.222.187.241]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id y11sm22312746wie.7.2013.11.06.01.15.59 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 06 Nov 2013 01:16:02 -0800 (PST) Sender: Anton Shterenlikht Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.7/8.14.6) with ESMTP id rA69FvKZ075388 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 09:15:57 GMT (envelope-from mexas@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.7/8.14.6/Submit) id rA69FvRp075387 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 09:15:57 GMT (envelope-from mexas) Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 01:16:02 -0800 (PST) From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201311060915.rA69FvRp075387@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: ktrace help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: mexas@bris.ac.uk List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 09:23:22 -0000 I suspect that nginx causes my box to reboot. I don't get a panic or anything in the logs, just a reboot. So I wanted to see what nginx is doing prior to reboot with ktrace. I launch ktrace as "ktrace nginx", and I see that ktrace.out has some data. However, after reboot, it's empty: -rw------- 1 root wheel 0 Nov 6 09:04 ktrace.out Is this expected? Thanks Anton From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 6 10:53:26 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F308FDE2 for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 10:53:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B71CE23FD for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 10:53:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-117-74.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.117.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 564BB3CD40; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 11:44:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id rA6AhoFk003290; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 11:43:50 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 11:43:50 +0100 From: Polytropon To: mexas@bris.ac.uk Subject: Re: ktrace help Message-Id: <20131106114350.2b6b8015.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <201311060915.rA69FvRp075387@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <201311060915.rA69FvRp075387@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 10:53:26 -0000 On Wed, 06 Nov 2013 01:16:02 -0800 (PST), Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > I suspect that nginx causes my box to reboot. > I don't get a panic or anything in the logs, > just a reboot. So I wanted to see what nginx > is doing prior to reboot with ktrace. > > I launch ktrace as "ktrace nginx", > and I see that ktrace.out has some data. > However, after reboot, it's empty: > > -rw------- 1 root wheel 0 Nov 6 09:04 ktrace.out > > Is this expected? Not intended, but can maybe be explained: The ktrace.out file is continuously written to, but at the time the system crashes and reboots, the data is lost because the file system is terribly interrupted in an inconsistent state. When the system boots up again, the damaged file is restored, but the data isn't associated anymore (and therefore lost). I don't know in how far it would be possible to have ktrace's output rerouted to a different kind of storage (e. g. a slower NFS share or a pipe that a different host / machine is listening to over the network)... In that case, all output that is lucky of being transmitted can be captured and won't be lost when the accidental reboot appears. By the way, this is an excellent example of a use case for a sufficiently fast and buffered dotmatrix line printer. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 6 15:21:17 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 276505B8 for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 15:21:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from eu1sys200aog117.obsmtp.com (eu1sys200aog117.obsmtp.com [207.126.144.143]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B81A26B3 for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 15:21:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com ([74.125.82.182]) (using TLSv1) by eu1sys200aob117.postini.com ([207.126.147.11]) with SMTP ID DSNKUnpeVuBfFol7TD7n7y8MX3LeXx4jCd8W@postini.com; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 15:21:16 UTC Received: by mail-we0-f182.google.com with SMTP id t61so5161986wes.27 for ; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 07:20:54 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:message-id:to:subject:reply-to; bh=mDt2K+Hqv9a9puaf4aOIY4VEcaiEguKa1c6jXceUgsY=; b=PfmreuZsyMq6izsFxnM1ZfCHSN3lcX4cQmRenUruZNx2g4A09JIgoBrOe1pV9Xi/Zl 5m7BpYmDVycyqJBMq7lQ2rhhDIn+r8XCpuZUPHCOgvpS89538SNso7jEz+mex+G5D4Vx 2hJK7UG2UEnjLGe2MT3yUK3uomFTpJ3IN2CkFUAyyEK0BCMxh2KrlekUY5jBzx/PmTT1 W1bzvBs8tVcHkeZeAH0x8kakP+nW0flAVbYu7SOA1b88YCEf7WdN3Vmwg03insdaxoAd vOJz/kBj3JO066FEglnA3UkgjyFdMS9JLEjYDPjjOQ/1CuvTk4I95Epd2cd8LEfIvf6N clkw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnqDSx1AM4enBtJeZwIwsKrQPaw/43u6EMuxEK00QK58ViPA+t8L4RCXeHr2w9vzT637R81MaXIvdJ019b5vrei+SHLQMgr/A+ncCuU2gM3u90LXcDWyUw1MLi1Al3ae1swXWciBpOBx/eycL7kdVCv90Kna6XvZcPrgFB0lHXrVzQi2SSPiQ2VtGgF3s2e+CAQVckP X-Received: by 10.180.87.69 with SMTP id v5mr2849086wiz.45.1383751254226; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 07:20:54 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.87.69 with SMTP id v5mr2849076wiz.45.1383751254015; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 07:20:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk. [137.222.187.241]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id d11sm3706773wic.4.2013.11.06.07.20.52 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 06 Nov 2013 07:20:53 -0800 (PST) Sender: Anton Shterenlikht Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.7/8.14.6) with ESMTP id rA6FKoeA084475 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 15:20:50 GMT (envelope-from mexas@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.7/8.14.6/Submit) id rA6FKovr084474 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 15:20:50 GMT (envelope-from mexas) Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 07:20:53 -0800 (PST) From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201311061520.rA6FKovr084474@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: kernel{thread taskq} 100% CPU X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: mexas@bris.ac.uk List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 15:21:17 -0000 I get a lot of: PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME CPU COMMAND 0 root 8 0 0K 416K CPU0 0 186:02 100.00% kernel{thread taskq} on my ia64 boxes. What is this thead? And why is it so busy? I've seen several similar questions on the net, but never any answers. Is this thread described in any man or wiki page? Thanks Anton From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 6 18:41:33 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CA3CDEC for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 18:41:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from juris.kaminskis@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-x232.google.com (mail-we0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC7DB23D5 for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 18:41:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f178.google.com with SMTP id q59so5265607wes.37 for ; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 10:41:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=PexZZkZZZOx5maE1f2ToxLhqHqF46aBio6RdYl5we2Q=; b=Elyw/g9+P2cPVSjosqEj/RpJtDuQJHPbTP2bGoQ/I9gdTS11y7Dj6zzQNgbA826n0I eitFwgB1gCdeikaKt/Vs4yTiYKpOGRW/ZU29ZmExxQea7+FowawGngOkpszO8ZOsjKxH 0sieNkqD7E9IyPcwU076RLLcgZaJQDer3F6QkpTUeqLcdvvlGxZ7lbCHr+fQzzbeMSWi G3rgfaqM6QH2EZ5sAEjL0w+z0KuwPiKiDFATtg0PXMH4zDlGLMBmKPqE39mg++o88RK8 jtQlPx/LQQx1OumWnUf6HXZpIAAmk36ZmDAjvBCGgbgogPWGkdrYaxxvox1Yy5Apc1Gm cbDg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.123.8 with SMTP id lw8mr3886139wjb.40.1383763290894; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 10:41:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.185.101 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 10:41:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20131105190317.2588.qmail@irelay.ssr.com> Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 20:41:30 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Share NTFS drive over NFS From: Juris Kaminskis To: krad Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 18:41:33 -0000 with mount -d i see following: mountd: getting export list mountd: reading exports from /etc/exports mountd: got line /home/juris/piltuve/ -alldirs mountd: making new ep fs=0xed00ff02,0xed mountd: doing opt -alldirs mountd: adding a default entry mountd: getting mount list mountd: here we go but in /var/log/messages i see following errors: mountd[1219]: could not remount /home/juris/piltuve/: Operation not supported mountd[1219]: bad exports list line /home/juris/piltuve/ -alldirs mountd[1219]: mount request denied from 192.168.1.104 for /home/juris/piltuve is there some way I can trace where is the error? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 7 01:17:05 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C668A73 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 01:17:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kyle@ktdassoff.net) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1D1B2E2F for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 01:17:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.43]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED9A621803 for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 20:17:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from web5 ([10.202.2.215]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 06 Nov 2013 20:17:01 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ktdassoff.net; h= message-id:from:to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:subject:date; s=mesmtp; bh=4MzWxQiclphRcb2qnQIYxwH H73o=; b=yFj5U98q/zidYlWoHDbFN97DkBoUX/agypBF0HAWeC+ddomxnERO5Eq uLZiHQ20MlrVQnpsA/qNWtZUGoDJ7+6LoUu1JtqlJABBA8ou7fndMa8xoReoBemg 7LB+heAheG2ms8eSQCoi/0nwAUdY/GoMTOVxnJF/3bruiIpaxO/4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:from:to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:subject:date; s=smtpout; bh=4MzWxQiclphRcb2qnQIYxwHH73o=; b=LyD6r1C/MJtQSsd1LmQRckGa1S4f CYoZAXmzvP8LziMJPCv1TiSKVGfBTlRcueitX2j81nzE8o5MLTOrOGft50cgkHtz oKxLaekf1oICSWt0pGE6wWGpl5fBKHdS3FchjfSdVQy3GsnGx6L7i+Xij4cCSXwK 1Wl3L8TD9vXr6t8= Received: by web5.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix, from userid 99) id CE636D60B86; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 20:17:01 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <1383787021.13461.44104609.0336D6C2@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: wFHYFrS6DrxXMUy4Suv+Jm5/HeXcoUblmPtW5gdZ7b6X 1383787021 From: KT Dassoff To: FreeBSD Questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-d4893488 Subject: Parallel Python packages for different versions w/ pkgng Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 19:17:01 -0600 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 01:17:05 -0000 Hey all, I had a question about installing multiple copies of Python packages from ports for different versions of Python (e.g. installing Sphinx for both Python 2.7 and Python 3.3). Now, I know to set the PYTHON_VERSION environment variable when building the appropriate py-* port. And the generated package will have the expected prefix (i.e. py27-* or py33-* etc). The problem is that ports/pkgng will treat a py27-* package and a py33-* package as different versions to be upgraded even though, as far as I know, they install their files to different site-packages trees according to the interpreter they're built for, and if I recall, this worked fine with the older package infrastructure. Example: * Install `textproc/py-sphinx` with no PYTHON_VERSION set (equivalent to =2.7); that succeeds, and `pkg info` later shows py27-sphinx installed * Install the same port with PYTHON_VERSION set to 3.3; the port will build fine, but when running `make install` (whether directly or via portmaster), it will try to replace py27-sphinx with py33-sphinx by deinstalling py27-sphinx before installing the py33 version Is there something else I need to do to install them side-by-side, or is this some bug in pkgng, or is there some actual conflict between Python packages via ports that I'm not aware of? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 7 03:48:14 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FC0D564 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 03:48:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@FreeBSD.org) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E69A9269F for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 03:48:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.42]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3AFE21D67 for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 22:42:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from web3 ([10.202.2.213]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 06 Nov 2013 22:42:02 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:from:to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:subject:date:in-reply-to :references; s=smtpout; bh=+Ym7TAwcf9wpPVCdBMP2UJmxhQ0=; b=KKBIu 5+Pyw74PfIi7XmvAbbE5d2tt+H88gNP0Ty8dvHQJ+t02Zv21Bk1+i1kDQXGzCNyv rjDreUDU9TaoUZFZN0wumbJBMRfH4PoXb0WDw36GA/fEYSyAqLnnVvgZ8F/MRow9 z4DoAHe0mv8799GyNBAvxbt8lgQA8YUdsniCUc= Received: by web3.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix, from userid 99) id 74EE110D23D; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 22:42:02 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <1383795722.20245.44141593.60C36EE4@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: FRpVLeI6HsP0mVe7JOeaudyN22mDNG9p6x3Y4q2TXhv8 1383795722 From: Mark Felder To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-d4893488 Subject: Re: Parallel Python packages for different versions w/ pkgng Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 21:42:02 -0600 In-Reply-To: <1383787021.13461.44104609.0336D6C2@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <1383787021.13461.44104609.0336D6C2@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 03:48:14 -0000 On Wed, Nov 6, 2013, at 19:17, KT Dassoff wrote: > Hey all, > I had a question about installing multiple copies of Python packages > from ports for different versions of Python (e.g. installing Sphinx for > both Python 2.7 and Python 3.3). Now, I know to set the PYTHON_VERSION > environment variable when building the appropriate py-* port. And the > generated package will have the expected prefix (i.e. py27-* or py33-* > etc). > > The problem is that ports/pkgng will treat a py27-* package and a py33-* > package as different versions to be upgraded even though, as far as I > know, they install their files to different site-packages trees > according to the interpreter they're built for, and if I recall, this > worked fine with the older package infrastructure. > > Example: > * Install `textproc/py-sphinx` with no PYTHON_VERSION set (equivalent to > =2.7); that succeeds, and `pkg info` later shows py27-sphinx installed > * Install the same port with PYTHON_VERSION set to 3.3; the port will > build fine, but when running `make install` (whether directly or via > portmaster), it will try to replace py27-sphinx with py33-sphinx by > deinstalling py27-sphinx before installing the py33 version > > Is there something else I need to do to install them side-by-side, or is > this some bug in pkgng, or is there some actual conflict between Python > packages via ports that I'm not aware of? > The pkg and ports team is working on fixing package name conflicts in the ports tree. Right now packages are identified by their origin in the ports tree. Both py27-sphinx and py33-sphinx have the same origin, textproc/py-sphinx, so they conflict. This will be resolved soon^TM when they're able to flip the switch to working with package names. I'm pretty sure your scenario will work just fine then. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 7 05:38:07 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4814E861 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 05:38:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sale@niromait.in) Received: from sg2plout10-01.prod.sin2.secureserver.net (sg2plout10-01.prod.sin2.secureserver.net [182.50.145.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B7C22BCE for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 05:38:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Niroma2PC ([122.177.41.238]) by sg2plout10-01.prod.sin2.secureserver.net with id mVao1m00758JfPe01VcRZV; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 22:36:26 -0700 From: "James" To: Subject: Web Proposal Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 11:05:49 +0530 Message-ID: <1bc801cedb7b$4cebb860$e6c32920$@NIROMAIT.IN> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: Ac7bexqdRmr2jNnRSq+j6E1bxdWdIw== Content-Language: en-in Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 05:38:07 -0000 Greeting of the day My name Is James Working as a Business Development Manager @niroma IT. Would like to discuss a business opportunity with you. We can execute the Web Design & Development or Mobile Apps Development projects on a white label basis for you. Our aim is to be the best service and as such we offer a premium service at very competitive prices then what it might be in house. We have a three tier quality check system so No compromise on quality! Our primary focus is :- Website Design Web development Mobile site development Database Programming E-commerce Solutions Android Apps development C M S Websites Portal Development IPhone Apps Development SEO Blog Submission Mobile Apps Development Support &Testing Link Building Apps Gul Design We provide Web \ Mobile Design & Development to a number of agencies and Establishment and have expertise in- Development highly effective corporate Website E-commerce\online Web Stores PHP, My SQL, NET, Joomla ,Word Press ,Durpal, ASP, CSS ,Android OS iPhone Xcode Xion OS JSON SOAP testing Design-Photoshop, Corel ,E-commerce-OS-Zen cart, virtue Mart, paypal Fedex and any checkout payment gateway system. Do let me know if you are interested and I would be happy to share our methodologies past working details and prices etc.. Kind regards, James Business Development Manager From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 7 07:58:46 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26464746 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 07:58:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mongkonwit_phu@winner.co.th) Received: from mail.winner.co.th (mail.winner.co.th [202.43.39.29]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BC462230 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 07:58:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [27.131.160.82] ([27.131.160.82]) by mail.winner.co.th (Kerio MailServer 6.5.1) for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 14:28:33 +0700 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org From: =?utf-8?Q?=E0=B8=99=E0=B8=B2=E0=B8=A2=E0=B8=A1=E0=B8=87=E0=B8=84?= =?utf-8?Q?=E0=B8=A5=E0=B8=A7=E0=B8=B4=E0=B8=8A=E0=B8=8D_=E0=B9=80?= =?utf-8?Q?=E0=B8=9C=E0=B8=B7=E0=B8=AD=E0=B8=81=E0=B8=82=E0=B8=B2?= =?utf-8?Q?=E0=B8=A7_=28=E0=B8=A0=E0=B8=B1=E0=B8=AA=29?= Subject: i have some problem Message-ID: <20131107072833.d3a0d2ef@mail.winner.co.th> Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 14:28:33 +0700 X-Mailer: Kerio MailServer 6.5.1 WebMail X-User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/30.0.1599.101 Safari/537.36 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 07:58:46 -0000 we use smartctl -a /dev/da0 but can not check HDD so i would like to know about problem. Detail of smartctl 6.0 smartctl 6.0 2012-10-10 r3643 [FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE amd64] (local build) Copyright (coffee) 2002-12, Bruce Allen, Christian Franke, www.smartmont= ools.org Vendor: LSI Product: Logical Volume Revision: 3000 User Capacity: 291,999,055,872 bytes [291 GB] Logical block size: 512 bytes Logical Unit id: 0x600508e000000000848d5098fa521d01 Device type: disk Local Time is: Thu Nov 7 14:11:55 2013 ICT Device does not support SMART Error Counter logging not supported Device does not support Self Test logging we use raid card is pile 2008 setup raid 10 it is detail raid card http://www.asus.com/Commercial=5FServers=5FWorkst= ations/PIKE=5F2008/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 7 08:32:45 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F1C5B79 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 08:32:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olivier2553@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x231.google.com (mail-wi0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DD3C252A for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 08:32:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id f4so244548wiw.16 for ; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 00:32:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=xSgz4FCeVajiBKm1KBn3XBLXMaGCCMbi65MLAkHoWL0=; b=eiekZoVIqam2JUtRhD5b7D7noBEzdTSNFWKXKiFPLM1DLJu1mm27RgM7bK/1yNaowu Gj+GQ7ZGgSGewgn3wKVqojROBQMFcl+Zd+TuKDtw9P1kM/enzODkurDLz/EOr11PuM2Z IC+3+tk09Yyk6rk0/pN+QgN6D1GoAgotJpgg1e0WfATiC1ZXMO2bdY78u4f6pRgupFm0 pbme74Oq5OK7Zyc+X4gfYVrhk+DdAsQNsVXmmWTbfipTDpwHTbIkGahwcNoOrGOpaVHt rkwqgHvafNHHU9N4KoKaTjKlXTlopV3wic5lDnsrigqRQcRAlY97nWx+FuKVURvHbY2z DoEw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.174.36 with SMTP id bp4mr6135054wjc.7.1383813163675; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 00:32:43 -0800 (PST) Sender: olivier2553@gmail.com Received: by 10.217.112.132 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 00:32:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20131107072833.d3a0d2ef@mail.winner.co.th> References: <20131107072833.d3a0d2ef@mail.winner.co.th> Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 15:32:43 +0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: BrNRjuP1r2_FPnEsRBwa7P5nrb8 Message-ID: Subject: Re: i have some problem From: Olivier Nicole To: =?TIS-620?B?udLCwaekxcfUqq0g4LzXzaGi0g==?= =?TIS-620?B?xyAowNHKKQ==?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 08:32:45 -0000 Pat, > we use smartctl -a /dev/da0 > but can not check HDD so i would like to know about problem. I think the reason is because smartctl is used to control a physical hard disk. But you have a hardware RAID, so /dev/da0 is not a physical hard disk, it is a RAID disk. RAID card does not support SMART. Best regards, Olivier > > Detail of smartctl 6.0 > > smartctl 6.0 2012-10-10 r3643 [FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE amd64] (local build) > Copyright (coffee) 2002-12, Bruce Allen, Christian Franke, www.smartmontools.org > > Vendor: LSI > Product: Logical Volume > Revision: 3000 > User Capacity: 291,999,055,872 bytes [291 GB] > Logical block size: 512 bytes > Logical Unit id: 0x600508e000000000848d5098fa521d01 > Device type: disk > Local Time is: Thu Nov 7 14:11:55 2013 ICT > Device does not support SMART > > Error Counter logging not supported > Device does not support Self Test logging > > we use raid card is pile 2008 setup raid 10 > > it is detail raid card http://www.asus.com/Commercial_Servers_Workstations/PIKE_2008/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 7 09:36:35 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39ED66EB for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 09:36:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2DB02AC9 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 09:36:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-117-74.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.117.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3425B3CB22; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 10:36:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id rA79aKd0003222; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 10:36:20 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 10:36:20 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Subject: Re: i have some problem Message-Id: <20131107103620.7b18f934.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20131107072833.d3a0d2ef@mail.winner.co.th> References: <20131107072833.d3a0d2ef@mail.winner.co.th> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 09:36:35 -0000 On Thu, 07 Nov 2013 14:28:33 +0700, mongkonwit_phu@winner.co.th wrote: > we use smartctl -a /dev/da0 > but can not check HDD so i would like to know about problem. > > Detail of smartctl 6.0 > [...] > Device does not support SMART > > Error Counter logging not supported > Device does not support Self Test logging The answer is right here: The device you're querying does not have S.M.A.R.T. support. The reason might be: > we use raid card is pile 2008 setup raid 10 The disk device da0 is part of a RAID configuration, it does not directly correspond to a disk. Only a "physical disk" can be addressed with smartctl. Your options: 1. Make the PIKE 2008 controller "hand the disk through", removing it from the RAID configuration. 2. Attach the disk to a direct connection. You won't be able to run smartctl diagnostics otherwise as this requires a "more direct access" than the RAID controller can offer. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 7 12:14:23 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3750468B for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 12:14:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qe0-x232.google.com (mail-qe0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c02::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC2D628E7 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 12:14:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qe0-f50.google.com with SMTP id 1so319707qee.23 for ; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 04:14:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=j2/2n4Kad4GxvFkwwUWPGYcQ/1Mtg69XaR7xYV4zo/k=; b=pnuVPgr9IeMELw+z0LPfIWm+Q7ONB5dTX+lalMHzRRBZ8mtgjrtrgn8LiphxYAom4T BeyWhjwI/6K37Gbfdat/C0V2ciJwJ7NYp1+/m7scpZY+wMG0QwIA0MQ224Wz/7aWQ4+E syrv732+LGc3uWBLVieLYSXWYsq6M68DDqPy/wkJzXmWLaRMEGhRbf5wRjcD21P+V9UQ PBzV3bPD96fHXRbp0W56ftT/oYhZVz/6ZfolP3s4I7Y32kM9wHRLm/RyMr5wdCwExu27 NHRa/KNmWrpl6IsQluxyt/a5KhUkxT+I7QBZ5bMRPrrjOtr/8kUO8Vhm90zrpoDWvBFu n/Jg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.49.35.15 with SMTP id d15mr12174882qej.16.1383826462079; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 04:14:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.55.77 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 04:14:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20131107072833.d3a0d2ef@mail.winner.co.th> References: <20131107072833.d3a0d2ef@mail.winner.co.th> Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 12:14:22 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: i have some problem From: krad To: =?TIS-620?B?udLCwaekxcfUqq0g4LzXzaGi0g==?= =?TIS-620?B?xyAowNHKKQ==?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=TIS-620 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 12:14:23 -0000 as other posts have said you are abstracted from the physical disks as you have a raid controller, therefore smart is unavailable directly from the os. The raid controller itself will monitor the drives health, which may or may not include smart. However to get this health information you will have to talk the the raid card. As you seem to have an LSI controller, try installing megacli and then have a loog at the following command MegaCli -PDList -aALL On 7 November 2013 07:28, =B9=D2=C2=C1=A7=A4=C5=C7=D4=AA=AD =E0=BC=D7=CD=A1= =A2=D2=C7 (=C0=D1=CA) < mongkonwit_phu@winner.co.th> wrote: > we use smartctl -a /dev/da0 > but can not check HDD so i would like to know about problem. > > Detail of smartctl 6.0 > > smartctl 6.0 2012-10-10 r3643 [FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE amd64] (local build) > Copyright (coffee) 2002-12, Bruce Allen, Christian Franke, > www.smartmontools.org > > Vendor: LSI > Product: Logical Volume > Revision: 3000 > User Capacity: 291,999,055,872 bytes [291 GB] > Logical block size: 512 bytes > Logical Unit id: 0x600508e000000000848d5098fa521d01 > Device type: disk > Local Time is: Thu Nov 7 14:11:55 2013 ICT > Device does not support SMART > > Error Counter logging not supported > Device does not support Self Test logging > > we use raid card is pile 2008 setup raid 10 > > it is detail raid card > http://www.asus.com/Commercial_Servers_Workstations/PIKE_2008/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 7 14:34:45 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57655AD8 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 14:34:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrei693@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-x232.google.com (mail-pa0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F96F247F for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 14:34:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id fb1so687808pad.23 for ; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 06:34:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+QMiErPsZxFqvakQoCCJRiyF9QIdAy2YmpA0xBlKHv4=; b=M2TysWdudoPGpgT1QaSh1ZYU83TJkazuDBSagPhByawrm+TcIBa0k2e95xysQsP7WW F07CeMDwe1d0EeymQ6a3YZOIRJAI4vCriJw3oEROf8BDhUnXw7NDvaawK0mwULIVyFVJ NhEW42XUv5dADBHWCO3EO0cmEMsViNCzdJqW4Ej3I4HVSihMmkEglKFihdEdapb9Y+bg XrDiDlch7RrAdGHQ+ZG7Fuzr6tYZIehyXtZLwLYbsayHRzAQCJOXweTiwfpoyURWSmy7 za9CJYthOasmLBaSLZDZ6hQU8qZtLagWqmdCGX43hp7btd/FJ9ErxDKfB/lr01iqAzx6 IIeg== X-Received: by 10.66.191.162 with SMTP id gz2mr10019734pac.151.1383834884830; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 06:34:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from ab_t510i.perfectworld.eu ([87.213.55.5]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id qw8sm5453512pbb.27.2013.11.07.06.34.42 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 07 Nov 2013 06:34:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <527BA4FF.1020506@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 15:34:39 +0100 From: Andrei Brezan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: i have some problem References: <20131107072833.d3a0d2ef@mail.winner.co.th> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 14:34:45 -0000 On 11/07/13 13:14, krad wrote: > as other posts have said you are abstracted from the physical disks as you > have a raid controller, therefore smart is unavailable directly from the > os. The raid controller itself will monitor the drives health, which may > or may not include smart. However to get this health information you will > have to talk the the raid card. As you seem to have an LSI controller, try > installing megacli and then have a loog at the following command > > MegaCli -PDList -aALL > > > > On 7 November 2013 07:28, นายมงคลวิà¸à¸ เผือà¸à¸‚าว (ภัส) < > mongkonwit_phu@winner.co.th> wrote: > >> we use smartctl -a /dev/da0 >> but can not check HDD so i would like to know about problem. >> >> Detail of smartctl 6.0 >> >> smartctl 6.0 2012-10-10 r3643 [FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE amd64] (local build) >> Copyright (coffee) 2002-12, Bruce Allen, Christian Franke, >> www.smartmontools.org >> >> Vendor: LSI >> Product: Logical Volume >> Revision: 3000 >> User Capacity: 291,999,055,872 bytes [291 GB] >> Logical block size: 512 bytes >> Logical Unit id: 0x600508e000000000848d5098fa521d01 >> Device type: disk >> Local Time is: Thu Nov 7 14:11:55 2013 ICT >> Device does not support SMART >> >> Error Counter logging not supported >> Device does not support Self Test logging >> >> we use raid card is pile 2008 setup raid 10 >> >> it is detail raid card >> http://www.asus.com/Commercial_Servers_Workstations/PIKE_2008/ >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" You should run pciconf -lv and search for you raid card. You can use that output with dmesg.boot and find out what driver is used for your raid card. If you are using LSI with mfi driver load mfip.ko module and run 'smartctl -a /dev/passX' Hope it helps, Andrei From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 7 15:03:55 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF6873B3 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 15:03:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lolox@lolox.net) Received: from altenberg.lolox.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:41d0:2:17c5::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F137262A for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 15:03:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from altenberg.lolox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by altenberg.lolox.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 174917F48D for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 16:03:54 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=lolox.net; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:mime-version :x-mailer:message-id:subject:subject:from:from:date:date :received:received; s=lolox; t=1383836631; bh=r/Fh0phn0eUwyi5jj/ GPZP0oMWl1Y9HS8d4g9lpWDB4=; b=RGNorgkFLaq1ILDB3EMwK7bpZy7E4xnnZA Yk2y8O4lUPiXWtFJQt1TwXuIVnQvjoHOYmPJrD6naKXVJEiJJomteF7C8VTe534p +DWptRmXpu466Azpunb49qDQ03/zDPstO1VjOQ9eMT4nYjAxWYQKQXd0fvOKSdl0 mCxvQS9io= X-Virus-Scanned: Mailstorm at lolox.net Received: from altenberg.lolox.net ([127.0.0.1]) by altenberg.lolox.net (altenberg.lolox.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id LBKxlHxYEVpA for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 16:03:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from linux-ll0t.site (unknown [31.36.56.253]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: lolox@lolox.net) by altenberg.lolox.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8761D7F483 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 16:03:51 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 16:03:49 +0100 From: lolox To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: security/p11-kit - libintl Message-ID: <20131107160349.5d6d6315@linux-ll0t.site> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.18; x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 15:03:55 -0000 Hi everyone ! I'm running into some trouble while updating security/p11 using portupgrade. I get this error: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lintl but, # ls -l `locate libintl.so` lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 12 Nov 7 15:19 /usr/local/lib/libintl.so-> libintl.so.9 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 48944 Nov 7 15:19 /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.9 and, # ldconfig -r | grep libintl 217:-lintl.9 => /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.9 I updated gcc recently to the stable version (gcc4.6) I also recompiled gettext, and still the same error. I also ran ldconfig, just in case... Any idea? Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 7 15:32:24 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD4459F2 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 15:32:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thinkerix@rocketmail.com) Received: from nm44-vm5.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm44-vm5.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [216.109.115.29]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 588662841 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 15:32:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.139.212.153] by nm44.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 07 Nov 2013 15:30:22 -0000 Received: from [98.139.211.200] by tm10.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 07 Nov 2013 15:30:22 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp209.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 07 Nov 2013 15:30:22 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rocketmail.com; s=s1024; t=1383838222; bh=QtdCL5MLEO0Wk/bNQWEbaXkeaqvJcjvuBHQtG1TNSy4=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-Rocket-Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=2bY9I1UGhWUy4u34L3Jv0cPzRQYsz+zg+WHwQKaRuk+weUiIs8BeCrDG41Ocxn4LyBow5rIc/192+Evr2fuQA0GSMRMObp0+TWI1kgBsjdmFNzFjsIZNBneVgirD5vKVBzVib5ZWIPRN5KPGJcrzc1bxC8r+jNzYwzJC+0xscsQ= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 645217.96052.bm@smtp209.mail.bf1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: nhevsIUVM1n8Kq90Ah69c3i.NoqNb2IzK88xEU7y2bKauok ydZ5fX.zPCxdokN1E.OJ37PUw316MhqEeRUpz3tqoL5BDCzrYmPPrvurM6_7 wmt3UMQGuXjXqZQU4dgNxo9CBB4w0yO_fnOKZBMf76Pw4QCT9q6KnLZpVXlq pH84_VZZb4A0i.ZEAj3rbqfm6DmP6m9NpIMY721fSlffJGeqLVaexGTGpTQr Wti0O0jb4W6cV7NehMuLP49FCSQV2yRYCLcLkp5fJshYJmTmu2whX6AaozIm NOZv973AIyK771MBWak96bQRzO1R6_beY5xZ6115NpPnHS3y199MLAwD5Ugg wndk4pdpfF6ut0tEZ_UZBjJ90MzEs.RahnVuidVGT3wrSN7HbWJxzC5Fkx_A Z5d9T1xcsGckmY3gw2WSVveMyc0ynrLSSQbvzpWSxjntq.wvIgRhCs2tVFPU 42jFVQMF3cLoxSbJ8rt2dWlxrapbwhXFsCXprU0BUBQBLo0uyyEjoU5AIihW mFbue4dQU3M5HUxCgvl6KrDwM8C0Q2BjxCUr3fRDRItOMmHR4KtaM6GyO9XI tPB9kLZZ5yQewv__.gX0UHmrSykVNiiaA0z1PO7iG_zVZgjv8gsoxH3qJmT7 hTqdQfKuBS_bjSGoJZhLMzIYWaDi8XWuQAp_oT_J86A-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: nPHueTiswBAMdHpPdB1VfyPI5uMz3FquT1t0EqCkVgWWTibZYg-- X-Rocket-Received: from [127.0.0.1] (thinkerix@178.128.114.252 with ) by smtp209.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 07 Nov 2013 07:30:22 -0800 PST Message-ID: <527BB20B.9040702@rocketmail.com> Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 17:30:19 +0200 From: Thinker Rix User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Motherbard chipset & CPU compatibility Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 15:32:24 -0000 Hello all! I want to buy a new server and run FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p11 on it (64bit) I am interested in 2 different solutions: A) Intel Socket 1155 Motherboard: Supermicro X9SCM-F (http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/Xeon/C202_C204/X9SCM-F.cfm) CPU: Pentium, 3rd generation Core i3 or Xeon E3-1200 v2 Onboard NICs: Intel® 82579LM and 82574L Supermicro's compatibility list proclaims compatibility as of: FreeBSD 8.1 (http://www.supermicro.com/support/resources/OS/C204.cfm) B) Intel Socket 1150 Motherboard: X10SLL-F (http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/Xeon/C220/X10SLL-F.cfm) CPU: Pentium, 4th generation Core i3 or Xeon E3-1200 v3 Onboard NICs: Intel® i217LM & 1x Intel® i210AT Supermicro's compatibility list proclaims compatibility as of: FreeBSD 9.1 (http://www.supermicro.com/support/resources/OS/C222.cfm) So according to the information provided by Supermicro, only Solution A should be compatible with FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p11 Questions: 1. Someone has told me, that I can use even brand new CPUs/Chipsets on the old FreeBSD version; only new cutting-edge CPU features might not be supported, but the system should be running (due to general i386-64bit compatibility?!). Is that true? Could I use solution B), too then? 2. How about the NICs of both solutions, are they supported by FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p11? Thank you for any advice! Regards Thinker Rix P.S. Please do not advise me to just use newer versions of FreeBSD - the reason for me using this outdated version is that I am bound to a special-purpose distribution that is based on FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p11 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 7 15:38:59 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 244E8F5D for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 15:38:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lolox@lolox.net) Received: from altenberg.lolox.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:41d0:2:17c5::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5E8E28A1 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 15:38:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from altenberg.lolox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by altenberg.lolox.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 881247F38C for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 16:38:57 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=lolox.net; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:mime-version :x-mailer:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:subject:from :from:date:date:received:received; s=lolox; t=1383838734; bh=Kf+ ZiPCtIRfsfTJDkQCDne9VNHU5D7Lv7WYC6QXHnBA=; b=Z/w8O9Bv0OJ9idh0U3l ZxFm1zXrErww2uAtxKxMxZuu8DVJhnJjOfKaXJvThUtRloHoeDEdIAx6ZA7w1wql QboJOZTQ6vBlwu/fx6tddWmpHLF9ymXduI9Jlgeruo9KnzveXWnp/+CFS7QZdhjy nfjaElPB6m2wZEXY9KLa7hgU= X-Virus-Scanned: Mailstorm at lolox.net Received: from altenberg.lolox.net ([127.0.0.1]) by altenberg.lolox.net (altenberg.lolox.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 9PxT9mETf5yn for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 16:38:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from linux-ll0t.site (unknown [31.36.56.253]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: lolox@lolox.net) by altenberg.lolox.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 771B17F37C for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 16:38:54 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 16:38:53 +0100 From: Loic Capdeville To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: security/p11-kit - libintl Message-ID: <20131107163853.60654101@linux-ll0t.site> In-Reply-To: <20131107160349.5d6d6315@linux-ll0t.site> References: <20131107160349.5d6d6315@linux-ll0t.site> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.18; x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 15:38:59 -0000 Problem resolved. adding "LDFLAGS=3D-L/usr/local/lib" to '/etc/make.conf' did the trick. Sorry for bothring you. lolox Le Thu, 7 Nov 2013 16:03:49 +0100, lolox a =C3=A9crit : > Hi everyone ! >=20 > I'm running into some trouble while updating security/p11 using > portupgrade. >=20 > I get this error:=20 > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lintl >=20 > but, > # ls -l `locate libintl.so` > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 12 Nov 7 > 15:19 /usr/local/lib/libintl.so-> libintl.so.9=20 > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 48944 Nov 7 > 15:19 /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.9 >=20 > and, > # ldconfig -r | grep libintl > 217:-lintl.9 =3D> /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.9 >=20 > I updated gcc recently to the stable version (gcc4.6) > I also recompiled gettext, and still the same error. > I also ran ldconfig, just in case... >=20 > Any idea?=20 >=20 > Thanks > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 7 16:24:25 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BB6E799 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 16:24:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@todoo.biz) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [213.251.152.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 214122B7D for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 16:24:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [213.251.152.9]) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7F661CD8AA for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 17:16:59 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.8.0 (20120630) at rmm.fr Received: from newmail.rmm.fr ([213.251.152.9]) by newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [213.251.152.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kdhraGqIPXCT for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 17:16:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [87.98.206.99]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hidden) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2EF601CD899 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 17:16:59 +0100 (CET) From: "bsd@todoo.biz" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Installing ezjail and poudriere on same host Message-Id: <4AD588FF-0B9B-4594-9D1A-3A0CD0EE56AA@todoo.biz> Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 17:16:58 +0100 To: Liste FreeBSD Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1816\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1816) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 16:24:25 -0000 Hi,=20 I need to install a compile environment to distribute my packages on my = various servers.=20 One of the host I could potentially use is an ezjail server where there = are few jails running=85=20 Since poudriere also uses jail mechanism, I wanted to know if anyone has = already used both on the same base host ?=20 I would like to avoid potential conflicts between two running instances = both using jail mechanism in very different ways.=20 =97=97=97=97 Another potential clue would be to install poudriere inside an existing = jail=85 ?=20 Has anyone tried that already ? Or is poudriere supposed to run natively = on the base host ?=20 Thanks.=20 ________________________________________________ =AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?= =BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7 =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF= =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF Your provider of OpenSource Appliances www.osnet.eu =09 ________________________________________________ =AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?= =BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7 =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF= =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF PGP ID --> 0x1BA3C2FD From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 7 17:14:05 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34F98956 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 17:14:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@FreeBSD.org) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09F042EE6 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 17:14:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.42]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35BA621610 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 12:14:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from web3 ([10.202.2.213]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 07 Nov 2013 12:14:01 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:from:to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:references :subject:date; s=smtpout; bh=QdtJ7qpKCnpfo7SKKcPP2dCXyPc=; b=Mxl KpouJvrZrKwcpfPPk+CuzxyfwfVMscSfLp7dCydAgOdw8KTbFjhGFmh0cGOLWyiv BJXnFoVHBOLOwvowKexDNlItb/CadrX2+pHwZYS1+D7H2asScfEXEP3/qs+/gJEQ Ng5fC7Qed8VVsC7hSqzIJn40c4fPbrEi2Vehbxiw= Received: by web3.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix, from userid 99) id 134AC111C4A; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 12:14:01 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <1383844441.26119.44397721.34E84B4B@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: 4nlBw2TRotQiSNP3iCz+jpe5VENhvP/H02ddlbO3XLOp 1383844441 From: Mark Felder To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-d4893488 In-Reply-To: <4AD588FF-0B9B-4594-9D1A-3A0CD0EE56AA@todoo.biz> References: <4AD588FF-0B9B-4594-9D1A-3A0CD0EE56AA@todoo.biz> Subject: Re: Installing ezjail and poudriere on same host Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 11:14:01 -0600 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 17:14:05 -0000 On Thu, Nov 7, 2013, at 10:16, bsd@todoo.biz wrote: > Hi,=20 >=20 > I need to install a compile environment to distribute my packages on my > various servers.=20 >=20 > One of the host I could potentially use is an ezjail server where there > are few jails running=E2=80=A6=20 >=20 >=20 > Since poudriere also uses jail mechanism, I wanted to know if anyone has > already used both on the same base host ?=20 > I would like to avoid potential conflicts between two running instances > both using jail mechanism in very different ways.=20 >=20 This is no different than running multiple jails. They have their own areas they work in, so there is no harm or conflict. From my main server: tank/jails 45.6G 496G 676K /tank/jails tank/jails/basejail 736M 496G 196M /tank/jails/basejail tank/jails/bip 536M 496G 390M /tank/jails/bip tank/jails/buildjail 1.07G 496G 1.04G=20 /tank/jails/buildjail tank/jails/fulljail 49K 496G 31K /tank/jails/fulljail tank/jails/games 7.38G 496G 6.98G /tank/jails/games tank/jails/irc 1021M 496G 885M /tank/jails/irc tank/jails/mailman 232M 496G 191M /tank/jails/mailman tank/jails/mysql 1.56G 496G 1.48G /tank/jails/mysql tank/jails/newjail 1.69M 496G 1.16M /tank/jails/newjail tank/jails/postgres 586M 496G 516M /tank/jails/postgres tank/poudriere 8.40G 496G 33K /tank/poudriere tank/poudriere/data 2.93G 496G 2.08G=20 /usr/local/poudriere/data tank/poudriere/jails 3.95G 496G 31K=20 /tank/poudriere/jails tank/poudriere/jails/100amd64 591M 496G 538M=20 /usr/local/poudriere/jails/100amd64 tank/poudriere/jails/91amd64 553M 496G 488M=20 /usr/local/poudriere/jails/91amd64 tank/poudriere/jails/91i386 507M 496G 450M=20 /usr/local/poudriere/jails/91i386 tank/poudriere/jails/92amd64 548M 496G 506M=20 /usr/local/poudriere/jails/92amd64 tank/poudriere/jails/92i386 516M 496G 467M=20 /usr/local/poudriere/jails/92i386 tank/poudriere/jails/head 1.30G 496G 1.08G=20 /usr/local/poudriere/jails/head tank/poudriere/ports 1.52G 496G 31K=20 /tank/poudriere/ports tank/poudriere/ports/default 1.52G 496G 744M=20 /usr/local/poudriere/ports/default From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 7 17:24:50 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9971E13 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 17:24:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lolox@lolox.net) Received: from altenberg.lolox.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:41d0:2:17c5::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97B152FAA for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 17:24:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from altenberg.lolox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by altenberg.lolox.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C868C7F3F9 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 18:24:41 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=lolox.net; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:mime-version :x-mailer:message-id:subject:subject:from:from:date:date :received:received; s=lolox; t=1383845078; bh=loyNAd2xi+Shtb3K2r sYKnri5l2mg/bJRipPnsPe0OQ=; b=fApNk0KDjPheVfmWQlt1Bh2sKOfZ3ohRTO CFsPjQm/fTB0tBtcOSkxqY5M5Fz0jcyJPgRGKguEValHf/Mi+zwWAnRa2wPyovyG qguV93LDNxA0i841pLFl8VJW6TEMsHdePL5g66xwMKvp81M2iNE4s3RCentMCWLt rN/Bgz9qs= X-Virus-Scanned: Mailstorm at lolox.net Received: from altenberg.lolox.net ([127.0.0.1]) by altenberg.lolox.net (altenberg.lolox.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id g2aBS3Tm3aLL for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 18:24:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from linux-ll0t.site (unknown [31.36.56.253]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: lolox@lolox.net) by altenberg.lolox.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7E91E7F386 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 18:24:38 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 18:24:36 +0100 From: lolox To: Liste FreeBSD Subject: libmap.conf Message-ID: <20131107182436.26f044c2@linux-ll0t.site> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.18; x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 17:24:50 -0000 Hi, I switched to gcc4.6 recently, and I encountered a problem while updating the cmake port: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version GLIBCXX_3.4.11 required by /usr/ports/devel/cmake/work/cmake-2.8.12/Bootstrap.cmk/cmake not found" Before that, I followed a guide explaining what to do when updating gcc that said to put at least: Libstdc++.so.6 gcc46/libstdc++.so.6 in /etc/libmap.conf But obviously, that didn't helped. A 'locate libstdc++.so' gives me this: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 /usr/lib32/libstdc++.so /usr/lib32/libstdc++.so.6 /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libstdc++.so.6 /usr/local/lib/gcc42/libstdc++.so /usr/local/lib/gcc42/libstdc++.so.6 /usr/local/lib/gcc46/libstdc++.so /usr/local/lib/gcc46/libstdc++.so.6 /usr/local/lib/gcc46/libstdc++.so.6-gdb.py I tried to rename /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 just to try if it changed anything, and, surprise! That WORKED! So, my question is: Isn't libmap.conf supposed to do the trick without doing this horrible hack? Did I miss anything? Thanks in advance. lolox From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 7 19:49:06 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99334637 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 19:49:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trashcan@odo.in-berlin.de) Received: from mx1.enfer-du-nord.net (mx1.enfer-du-nord.net [91.121.60.26]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6170928FA for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 19:49:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sulu.fritz.box (p5DDC1ECE.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.220.30.206]) by mx1.enfer-du-nord.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3dFw5c70Rtz4bL for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 20:43:32 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) Subject: Re: Installing ezjail and poudriere on same host From: Michael Grimm In-Reply-To: <4AD588FF-0B9B-4594-9D1A-3A0CD0EE56AA@todoo.biz> Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 20:43:32 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <7F836B97-D302-4272-ACBF-598F613562FA@odo.in-berlin.de> References: <4AD588FF-0B9B-4594-9D1A-3A0CD0EE56AA@todoo.biz> To: Liste FreeBSD X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 19:49:06 -0000 On 07.11.2013, at 17:16, bsd@todoo.biz wrote: > Since poudriere also uses jail mechanism, I wanted to know if anyone = has already used both on the same base host ?=20 > I would like to avoid potential conflicts between two running = instances both using jail mechanism in very different ways. I do use ezjail to deal with all my service jails besides poudriere = without any issues. =20 If you do direct poudriere's repository into ezjail's basejail directory = ... POUDRIERE_DATA=3D/path-to-ezjail/basejail/poudriere ... you are able to omit a webserver for fetching your packages within = all your jails running on your host. YMMV if poudriere's repository is = meant to serve multiple hosts, though. Regards, Michael From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 7 20:45:28 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56E9128D for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 20:45:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@todoo.biz) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [213.251.152.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC6E2CD9 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 20:45:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [213.251.152.9]) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D189131AC for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 21:45:27 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.8.0 (20120630) at rmm.fr Received: from newmail.rmm.fr ([213.251.152.9]) by newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [213.251.152.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y70OFMx_kByf for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 21:45:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [87.98.206.99]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hidden) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 442071319A for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 21:45:26 +0100 (CET) From: "bsd@todoo.biz" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Running gpart boot code after upgrade zfs pool to feature flag ? Message-Id: Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 21:45:26 +0100 To: Liste FreeBSD Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1816\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1816) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 20:45:28 -0000 Hello,=20 I have just successfully upgraded my server from 9.1 to 9.2 and = activated the latest feature flag on my zpool.=20 > tube:root 21:04:53 /root # zpool upgrade -a=20 > This system supports ZFS pool feature flags. >=20 > Successfully upgraded 'zroot' from version 28 to feature flags. > Enabled the following features on 'zroot': > async_destroy > empty_bpobj > lz4_compress >=20 > If you boot from pool 'zroot', don't forget to update boot code. > Assuming you use GPT partitioning and da0 is your boot disk > the following command will do it: >=20 > gpart bootcode -b /boot/pmbr -p /boot/gptzfsboot -i 1 da0 >=20 I really don't know if I need to issue this command=85=20 I have tried to figure out by reading the man gpart but It is not 100% = clear to me=85=20 My gpart config is as follow :=20 > tube:root 21:11:05 /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/poudriere screen # gpart show > =3D> 34 1677721533 da0 GPT (800G) > 34 128 1 freebsd-boot (64k) > 162 6 - free - (3.0k) > 168 8388608 2 freebsd-swap (4.0G) > 8388776 1669332784 3 freebsd-zfs (796G) > 1677721560 7 - free - (3.5k) >=20 > =3D> 63 113246145 da1 MBR (54G) > 63 113242122 1 freebsd [active] (54G) > 113242185 4023 - free - (2M) >=20 > =3D> 0 113242122 da1s1 BSD (54G) > 0 4194304 1 freebsd-ufs (2.0G) > 4194304 8388608 2 freebsd-swap (4.0G) > 12582912 4194304 4 freebsd-ufs (2.0G) > 16777216 31457280 5 freebsd-ufs (15G) > 48234496 65007626 6 freebsd-ufs (31G) >=20 Shall I run the command provided or not ?=20 > gpart bootcode -b /boot/pmbr -p /boot/gptzfsboot -i 1 da0 Any help will be welcome since I really don't want to mess up with my = server.=20 Thanks. ________________________________________________ =AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?= =BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7 =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF= =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF BSD - BSD - BSD - BSD - BSD - BSD - BSD - BSD - ________________________________________________ =AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?= =BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7 =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF= =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF PGP ID --> 0x1BA3C2FD From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 8 04:10:42 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB6A5606 for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 04:10:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimee2@suorec.net) Received: from m97173.qiye.163.com (m97173.qiye.163.com [220.181.97.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AA312952 for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 04:10:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from aimee2$suorec.net ( [58.252.14.41] ) by ajax-webmail-wmsvr13 (Coremail) ; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 11:53:42 +0800 (CST) X-Originating-IP: [58.252.14.41] Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 11:53:42 +0800 (CST) From: aimee2 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: pay attention to the field of cleanroom X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Coremail Webmail Server Version SP_ntes V3.5 build 20131012(23719.5622.5618) Copyright (c) 2002-2013 www.mailtech.cn 163-hosting MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <57248038.6812.14235d813bb.Coremail.aimee2@suorec.net> X-CM-TRANSID: reCowAC3DTNIYHxSk+AQAA--.13517W X-CM-SenderInfo: 5dlpvv2s6v30huhfh0dhw/1tbiDQbPjFIbhJSq2AACsh X-Coremail-Antispam: 1U5529EdanIXcx71UUUUU7vcSsGvfC2KfnxnUU== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 04:10:42 -0000 SGksIERlYXIgcHVyY2hhc2luZyBtYW5hZ2VyICwKCldlIGFyZSBhIGJpZyBzdXBwbGllciBmb3Ig Y2xlYW5yb29tIGNvbnN1bWFibGVzIGZyb20gY2hpbmEuIDEwMDlDICYgMzAwOUQgJiBISzUwOUMg JiBTWTYwQURGIENsZWFucm9vbSB3aXBlciBoYXZlIGJlZW4gd2lkZWx5IHVzZWQgaW4gdGhlIGNp cmN1aXQgYm9hcmQgZmllbGQuCgpTdW9yZWMgUG9seWVzdGVyIFdpcGVycyBhcmUgbWFkZSBvZiBo aWdobHkgZHVyYWJsZSBmaWxhbWVudHMgb2YgcG9seWVzdGVyIHlhcm5zLiBTdW9yZWMgTWljcm9m aWJlciBXaXBlciBpcyBjb21wb3NlZCBvZiBQb2x5ZXN0ZXIgYW5kIE55bG9uIGNvbXBvc2l0ZSBt YXRlcmlhbC4gWW91IGNhbiBjaG9vc2UgZnJvbSB0aGUgZGlmZmVyZW50IHR5cGVzIG9mIGVkZ2Vz IHdlIGhhdmU6ICB0aGVybWFsbHktc2VhbGVkIGJvcmRlcnMsIHVsdHJhc29uaWMgY3V0LCBsYXNl ciBjdXQsIGNvbGQgY3V0LiBUaGVpciBub3JtYWwgc2l6ZTo0JycgJiA24oCdICYgOScnLgoKT2Yg Y291cnNlLCB3ZSBoYXZlIG90aGVyIGtpbmRzIG9mIHByb2R1Y3RzLiBzdWNoIGFzIENsZWFucm9v bSBmYWNlIG1hc2vvvIxDbGVhbnJvb20gc3dhYiwgY2xlYW5yb29tIHBhcGVyIGFuZCBzbyBvbi4K Ck1vcmUgaXRlbXMsIEtpbmRseSB2aXNpdCBvdXIgd2ViIHd3dy5zdW9yZWMuY29tIC4KCkkgYW0g bG9va2luZyBmb3J3YXJkIHRvIHlvdXIgZWFybHkgcmVwbHkKClRrcyAmIFJncwoKWW91cnMgc2lu Y2VyZWx5ICAKCkFpbWVlCgpfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f XwpDb21wYW55IE5hbWU6IERvbmdHdWFuIFN1b3JlYyBFbGVjdHJvbmljIE1hdGVyaWFsIENvLixM dGQKQWRkOlhpbkhlIEluZHVzdHJpYWwgWm9uZSxXYW5KaWFuZ0Rpc3RyaWN0LERvbmdHdWFuLgpH dWFuZ0RvbmcsQ2hpbmEgICAgKFBvc3RhbCBDb2RlOjUyMzAzOSkKVEVMOiA4Ni03NjktODgwOTgw ODYtMzIwCkVtYWlsOiBhaW1lZTFAc3VvcmVjLm5ldApRUToxMjUyNDUzMTA0ICBza3lwZTpBaW1l ZTYxODcxMQpXZWJzaXRlOiBodHRwOi8vd3d3LnN1b3JlYy5jb20= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 8 09:43:12 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3590CE33 for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 09:43:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from c.kworr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-x236.google.com (mail-lb0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B643F2CA5 for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 09:43:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f182.google.com with SMTP id w6so1282021lbh.27 for ; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 01:43:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=p4PhLh8+CZ6QxH0V6P7I77XJpI7pZhsoxjc4jUFjhkI=; b=IMl/ICkhdiuzet2JdbpBtGMj8YK3TKnfiZXEj/5IMT19TjKqNHuro8LqTIjCF+2kPG UgC8DUMurtN+XbhLL6z3itfnilN//EZWkCEkcKxa4R39ZXZdoG91No32lEtP678wjPrs WXhlbatVHh15aa2W1m4S8yo+pH8cG1ptXNgr/7f1i7k9WJXZ5qNssk64n4tDR4RdDug9 6EEUCtzA/litCnN9FjJq2VAC1l2G9sVJiW28h88iPW3QcBVwDG3KZ1DzZkm56s2lMVxN GBMwgGZxjRAxePosbWDqGqbrULbIfEbPd1+vYSLU1f5u5JNsu9hxKRUSSiJJl/5lmvAe 2eNA== X-Received: by 10.112.171.228 with SMTP id ax4mr10142298lbc.6.1383903789799; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 01:43:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.129] (mau.donbass.com. [92.242.127.250]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ew3sm6120616lac.1.2013.11.08.01.43.08 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 08 Nov 2013 01:43:09 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <527CB22B.6050506@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 11:43:07 +0200 From: Volodymyr Kostyrko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lolox , Liste FreeBSD Subject: Re: libmap.conf References: <20131107182436.26f044c2@linux-ll0t.site> In-Reply-To: <20131107182436.26f044c2@linux-ll0t.site> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 09:43:12 -0000 07.11.2013 19:24, lolox wrote: > I switched to gcc4.6 recently, and I encountered a problem while > updating the cmake port: > /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version GLIBCXX_3.4.11 required > by /usr/ports/devel/cmake/work/cmake-2.8.12/Bootstrap.cmk/cmake not > found" > So, my question is: > Isn't libmap.conf supposed to do the trick without doing this horrible > hack? Horrible hack? You switched to gcc46 so you started that. Right string: libstdc++.so.6 gcc46/libstdc++.so.6 -- Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 8 09:48:07 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3940614D for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 09:48:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from smtp.eutelia.it (mp1-smtp-6.eutelia.it [62.94.10.166]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B65B92CDC for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 09:48:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ns2.biolchim.it (ip-188-188.sn2.eutelia.it [83.211.188.188]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.eutelia.it (Eutelia) with ESMTP id 227896A8D62 for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 10:47:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from soth.ventu (adsl-ull-240-148.41-151.net24.it [151.41.148.240]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns2.biolchim.it (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rA89lktd011592 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 10:47:51 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: ns2.biolchim.it: Host adsl-ull-240-148.41-151.net24.it [151.41.148.240] claimed to be soth.ventu Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rA89lePB007383; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 10:47:40 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <527CB33C.5090804@netfence.it> Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 10:47:40 +0100 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "R. Scott Evans" Subject: Re: [Half OT] Mavericks' Mail and SSL References: <52718078.8080702@netfence.it> <5272C747.8030805@rsle.net> <5273EF3F.8040307@netfence.it> <5273FD23.7090207@rsle.net> <527554CE.1040605@netfence.it> <527905F3.6020501@rsle.net> In-Reply-To: <527905F3.6020501@rsle.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (ns2.biolchim.it [192.168.2.203]); Fri, 08 Nov 2013 10:47:51 +0100 (CET) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.74 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 09:48:07 -0000 On 11/05/13 15:51, R. Scott Evans wrote: > I'm using a CA signed certificate. So I suspect this might be the cause... I'll see if I can try with a CA signed certificate. > It's worth mentioning I also do SMTP Auth Me too, but I don't get that far. The connection is lost long before the HELO stage. > I only edit the .mc and let sendmail generate the .cf from that so I've > included the relevant portions of the .mc instead (below). > ... Look similar enough to mine... but I'll check better when I can. Meanwhile, I was able to get an ssldump: New TCP connection #1: xxxx.xxxxxx(51073) <-> host-43-19.xxxx.it(465) 1 1 0.0051 (0.0051) C>S Handshake ClientHello Version 3.1 cipher suites Unknown value 0xff Unknown value 0xc024 Unknown value 0xc023 Unknown value 0xc00a Unknown value 0xc009 Unknown value 0xc007 Unknown value 0xc008 Unknown value 0xc028 Unknown value 0xc027 Unknown value 0xc014 Unknown value 0xc013 Unknown value 0xc011 Unknown value 0xc012 Unknown value 0xc026 Unknown value 0xc025 Unknown value 0xc02a Unknown value 0xc029 Unknown value 0xc005 Unknown value 0xc004 Unknown value 0xc002 Unknown value 0xc003 Unknown value 0xc00f Unknown value 0xc00e Unknown value 0xc00c Unknown value 0xc00d Unknown value 0x3d Unknown value 0x3c Unknown value 0x2f TLS_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA TLS_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_MD5 Unknown value 0x35 TLS_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_NULL_SHA Unknown value 0x6b Unknown value 0x33 Unknown value 0x39 TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA compression methods NULL 1 2 0.0077 (0.0026) S>C Handshake ServerHello Version 3.1 session_id[32]= e9 8a 9b b2 8b ca b4 bb 51 89 a7 94 8a 87 29 bb c1 bd f2 8e 05 03 3b 92 33 ca 32 53 d2 3b ce d9 cipherSuite Unknown value 0x2f compressionMethod NULL 1 3 0.0077 (0.0000) S>C Handshake Certificate 1 4 0.0077 (0.0000) S>C Handshake CertificateRequest certificate_types rsa_sign certificate_types dss_sign certificate_types unknown value certificate_authority 30 81 8f 31 0b 30 09 06 03 55 04 06 13 02 49 54 31 10 30 0e 06 03 55 04 08 13 07 42 6f 6c 6f 67 6e 61 31 25 30 23 06 03 55 04 0a 13 1c 4e 65 74 46 65 6e 63 65 20 64 69 20 56 65 6e 74 75 72 6f 6c 69 20 41 6e 64 72 65 61 31 22 30 20 06 03 55 04 03 13 19 4e 65 74 46 65 6e 63 65 20 72 6f 6f 74 20 63 65 72 74 69 66 69 63 61 74 65 31 23 30 21 06 09 2a 86 48 86 f7 0d 01 09 01 16 14 70 72 6f 62 6c 65 6d 73 40 6e 65 74 66 65 6e 63 65 2e 69 74 ServerHelloDone 1 0.0711 (0.0633) C>S TCP FIN 1 0.0713 (0.0002) S>C TCP FIN New TCP connection #2: xxxx.xxxxxx(51074) <-> host-43-19.xxxx.it(465) If anyone could make something out of this... bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 8 10:04:34 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFE1AB2E for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 10:04:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lolox@lolox.net) Received: from altenberg.lolox.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:41d0:2:17c5::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D62A2E35 for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 10:04:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from altenberg.lolox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by altenberg.lolox.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B3097F3EB; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 11:04:32 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=lolox.net; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:mime-version :x-mailer:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:subject:from :from:date:date:received:received; s=lolox; t=1383905069; bh=wfP 1FY/iFrkMPBpQxq5bH/77ZmkOHciJmr4vzctg5C8=; b=eQtAIY3lUySHZgdTTeN g6e4W1dAekFl/7buz2Wooce8l6bPPJowbeCWq4hJSpvR0zgF0U4VAzrEeA40eANy tk2o4zGDt80eb1PesKzu3DgsPmv+2OJF/y1IIZ3AYiTUdtc6n2ps/VYNZD+y8uxA LsznVDpT0Ij643OuFcFKhJ6w= X-Virus-Scanned: Mailstorm at lolox.net Received: from altenberg.lolox.net ([127.0.0.1]) by altenberg.lolox.net (altenberg.lolox.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id e3tuTedCxf3k; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 11:04:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from linux-ll0t.site (unknown [31.36.56.253]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: lolox@lolox.net) by altenberg.lolox.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6D2037F386; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 11:04:29 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 11:04:27 +0100 From: lolox To: Volodymyr Kostyrko Subject: Re: libmap.conf Message-ID: <20131108110427.40ce269d@linux-ll0t.site> In-Reply-To: <527CB22B.6050506@gmail.com> References: <20131107182436.26f044c2@linux-ll0t.site> <527CB22B.6050506@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.18; x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Liste FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 10:04:34 -0000 Le Fri, 08 Nov 2013 11:43:07 +0200, Volodymyr Kostyrko a =C3=A9crit : > 07.11.2013 19:24, lolox wrote: > > I switched to gcc4.6 recently, and I encountered a problem while > > updating the cmake port: > > /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version GLIBCXX_3.4.11 required > > by /usr/ports/devel/cmake/work/cmake-2.8.12/Bootstrap.cmk/cmake not > > found" >=20 > > So, my question is: > > Isn't libmap.conf supposed to do the trick without doing this > > horrible hack? >=20 > Horrible hack? You switched to gcc46 so you started that. >=20 > Right string: > libstdc++.so.6 gcc46/libstdc++.so.6 >=20 The horrible hack I'm talking about is renaming /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 BTW, you made me figure out that the first letter in my libmap.conf was capitalized. So, just a typo. Thanks=20 Lo=C3=AFc From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 8 12:55:21 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 634BE2D4 for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 12:55:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@FreeBSD.org) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 355FB2780 for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 12:55:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.45]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FEF220D83 for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 07:55:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from web3 ([10.202.2.213]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 08 Nov 2013 07:55:10 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:from:to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:subject:date:in-reply-to :references; s=smtpout; bh=iMw4Wdn0bCGIcIqh9tjG+3wwvyo=; b=rXpYq IxPJ9z9B7D5EZN0WtIzSOT5gZNV+WGj+kOPtylr45GLB8VkFSlvGhkDJ2HKW5lJx n9ukj6mp2JqWBTHB/cZVLaHEAn8H9CL0S3mYIXDHOkP6Y628XLFtbws/3RWgm2Kz qhSEd/90KteltcVFL2ywCrfKPKRmRLIEluIDPM= Received: by web3.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix, from userid 99) id E60B910A9D4; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 07:55:09 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <1383915309.25998.44747997.2B6544D9@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: 0IHrThG0hbPEIh6qZKegUlZ507OnAA9OtJ+KQX4uduUt 1383915309 From: Mark Felder To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-d4893488 Subject: Re: Running gpart boot code after upgrade zfs pool to feature flag ? Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 06:55:09 -0600 In-Reply-To: References: X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 12:55:21 -0000 On Thu, Nov 7, 2013, at 14:45, bsd@todoo.biz wrote: > Hello,=20 >=20 > I have just successfully upgraded my server from 9.1 to 9.2 and activated > the latest feature flag on my zpool.=20 >=20 >=20 > > tube:root 21:04:53 /root # zpool upgrade -a=20 > > This system supports ZFS pool feature flags. > >=20 > > Successfully upgraded 'zroot' from version 28 to feature flags. > > Enabled the following features on 'zroot': > > async_destroy > > empty_bpobj > > lz4_compress > >=20 > > If you boot from pool 'zroot', don't forget to update boot code. > > Assuming you use GPT partitioning and da0 is your boot disk > > the following command will do it: > >=20 > > gpart bootcode -b /boot/pmbr -p /boot/gptzfsboot -i 1 da0 > >=20 >=20 > I really don't know if I need to issue this command=E2=80=A6=20 >=20 > I have tried to figure out by reading the man gpart but It is not 100% > clear to me=E2=80=A6=20 >=20 > My gpart config is as follow :=20 >=20 >=20 > > tube:root 21:11:05 /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/poudriere screen # gpart show > > =3D> 34 1677721533 da0 GPT (800G) > > 34 128 1 freebsd-boot (64k) > > 162 6 - free - (3.0k) > > 168 8388608 2 freebsd-swap (4.0G) > > 8388776 1669332784 3 freebsd-zfs (796G) > > 1677721560 7 - free - (3.5k) > >=20 > > =3D> 63 113246145 da1 MBR (54G) > > 63 113242122 1 freebsd [active] (54G) > > 113242185 4023 - free - (2M) > >=20 > > =3D> 0 113242122 da1s1 BSD (54G) > > 0 4194304 1 freebsd-ufs (2.0G) > > 4194304 8388608 2 freebsd-swap (4.0G) > > 12582912 4194304 4 freebsd-ufs (2.0G) > > 16777216 31457280 5 freebsd-ufs (15G) > > 48234496 65007626 6 freebsd-ufs (31G) > >=20 >=20 > Shall I run the command provided or not ?=20 >=20 >=20 > > gpart bootcode -b /boot/pmbr -p /boot/gptzfsboot -i 1 da0 >=20 >=20 > Any help will be welcome since I really don't want to mess up with my > server.=20 >=20 Is your root filesystem ZFS or UFS? Based on the disk layouts you have provided I want to say you probably use ZFS, but I believe it's possible that you could be booting from da0 and mounting a UFS root from da1 (though I have never tested this type of setup). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 8 14:24:22 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3053FF4A for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 14:24:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from avasout08.plus.net (avasout08.plus.net [212.159.14.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95EF32C83 for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 14:24:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from curlew.milibyte.co.uk ([84.92.153.232]) by avasout08 with smtp id n2MA1m004516WCc012MBqX; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 14:21:12 +0000 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=OdqhUHjY c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=lfSX4pPLp9EkufIcToJk/A==:117 a=lfSX4pPLp9EkufIcToJk/A==:17 a=D7rCoLxHAAAA:8 a=0Bzu9jTXAAAA:8 a=mSnCZvPJBnkA:10 a=SDMVOrFoq10A:10 a=ZTb9aqGL9YkA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=VLFGbf-4Hr0A:10 a=s9oXJcMGAAAA:8 a=W1eSiJkQ6TnT8dFb0oEA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=uLUL6ODoYCkA:10 Received: from curlew.lan ([192.168.1.13]) by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Vemvt-0000li-Cm for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 14:21:10 +0000 From: Mike Clarke To: FreeBSD questions Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 14:21:07 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.1-RELEASE-p7; KDE/4.10.5; amd64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201311081421.07558.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.1.13 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on curlew.lan X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Subject: Problem with Google streetview and firefox Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on curlew.milibyte.co.uk) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 14:24:22 -0000 Google streetview worked fine with Firefox before my recent upgrade of ports but I now have a problem. On starting streetview I see the image but cannot pan, zoom or exit from streetview, in fact Google maps becomes totally unresponsive and the image window eventually goes black. curlew:/home/mike% uname -a FreeBSD curlew.lan 9.1-RELEASE-p7 FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE-p7 #0: Mon Sep 9 21:34:37 UTC 2013 root@amd64- builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 curlew:/home/mike% pkg info -x firefox firefox-esr-24.1.0_1,1 curlew:/home/mike% pkg info -x flash linux-f10-flashplugin-11.2r202.310 curlew:/home/mike% ls -l /usr/local/lib/qt4/libQtCore.so.4* lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 18 29 Oct 19:24 /usr/local/lib/qt4/libQtCore.so.4@ -> libQtCore.so.4.8.5 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 18 29 Oct 19:24 /usr/local/lib/qt4/libQtCore.so.4.8@ -> libQtCore.so.4.8.5 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 3897288 29 Oct 19:24 /usr/local/lib/qt4/libQtCore.so.4.8.5* I've pasted the first part of a log file below. The "Locale not supported" message appears as streetview starts and the "libQtCore.so.4: cannot open shared object file" message appears as soon as I move the mouse in the streetview window. The "Event: assertion failed" messages continue until I move the mouse out of the streetview area of the window. I see this problem with both firefox-esr-24.1.0_1,1 and firefox-25.0_1,1 but streetview works fine with midori-0.5.5_1. I have checked with Firefox in safe mode with all plugins disabled and still see the same problem. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Script started on Fri Nov 8 13:41:33 2013 curlew:/home/mike% firefox (process:2529): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_slice_set_config: assertion `sys_page_size == 0' failed Fontconfig error: "local.conf", line 27: invalid attribute 'name' Fontconfig error: "local.conf", line 35: invalid attribute 'name' Fontconfig error: "local.conf", line 43: invalid attribute 'name' Fontconfig error: "local.conf", line 51: invalid attribute 'name' (process:2542): Gtk-WARNING **: Locale not supported by C library. Using the fallback 'C' locale. Fontconfig error: "/usr/local/etc/fonts/conf.d/10-scale-bitmap-fonts.conf", line 70: non-double matrix element Fontconfig error: "/usr/local/etc/fonts/conf.d/10-scale-bitmap-fonts.conf", line 70: non-double matrix element Fontconfig warning: "/usr/local/etc/fonts/conf.d/10-scale-bitmap-fonts.conf", line 78: saw unknown, expected number (npviewer.bin:2542): Gtk-WARNING **: libQtCore.so.4: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory The program 'npviewer.bin' received an X Window System error. This probably reflects a bug in the program. The error was 'BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes)'. (Details: serial 222 error_code 8 request_code 142 minor_code 3) (Note to programmers: normally, X errors are reported asynchronously; that is, you will receive the error a while after causing it. To debug your program, run it with the --sync command line option to change this behavior. You can then get a meaningful backtrace from your debugger if you break on the gdk_x_error() function.) *** NSPlugin Wrapper *** ERROR: NPP_HandleEvent() wait for reply: Connection closed *** NSPlugin Wrapper *** WARNING:(/usr/ports/www/nspluginwrapper/work/nspluginwrapper-1.4.4/src/npw- wrapper.c:2848):invoke_NPP_HandleEvent: assertion failed: (rpc_method_invoke_possible(plugin->connection)) *** NSPlugin Wrapper *** WARNING:(/usr/ports/www/nspluginwrapper/work/nspluginwrapper-1.4.4/src/npw- wrapper.c:2848):invoke_NPP_HandleEvent: assertion failed: (rpc_method_invoke_possible(plugin->connection)) *** NSPlugin Wrapper *** WARNING:(/usr/ports/www/nspluginwrapper/work/nspluginwrapper-1.4.4/src/npw- wrapper.c:2848):invoke_NPP_HandleEvent: assertion failed: (rpc_method_invoke_possible(plugin->connection)) -- Mike Clarke From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 8 14:38:36 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0E55986 for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 14:38:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@rsle.net) Received: from mx1.rsle.net (mx1.rsle.net [IPv6:2607:ff40:b0b::4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 840EA2D4F for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 14:38:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prometheus.rsle.net (UNKNOWN [206.162.203.14] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mx1.rsle.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rA8EcR1b022269 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 8 Nov 2013 09:38:31 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@rsle.net) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98 at antivirus.rsle.net Message-ID: <527CF75E.8010703@rsle.net> Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 09:38:22 -0500 From: "R. Scott Evans" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrea Venturoli Subject: Re: [Half OT] Mavericks' Mail and SSL References: <52718078.8080702@netfence.it> <5272C747.8030805@rsle.net> <5273EF3F.8040307@netfence.it> <5273FD23.7090207@rsle.net> <527554CE.1040605@netfence.it> <527905F3.6020501@rsle.net> <527CB33C.5090804@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: <527CB33C.5090804@netfence.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (mx1.rsle.net [206.162.201.2]); Fri, 08 Nov 2013 09:38:31 -0500 (EST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 14:38:36 -0000 You might have a solution from Apple.... I was greeted with this update on my Mac today: http://support.apple.com/kb/HT6030 It's for compatibility with Gmail, but it might carry over to other mail systems? -scott From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 8 16:14:53 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9680B2F7 for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 16:14:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from c.kworr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-la0-x22f.google.com (mail-la0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1ED8F230A for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 16:14:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f47.google.com with SMTP id er20so1881931lab.6 for ; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 08:14:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EkQgPlstjOZCmjVMkIqOt/YHbDG9ZYijHl5rX9M295U=; b=zEu3abYn0xZpqtsSaeqygTb0f+Zi1ICwHl9QtuzzNCLNYLv79/e86HEeZEKFu3g6Ct FXXm8dVFKmQlDe7ic/jv9XRwL3KWk8+WgYsyrOioiC1Em0m3GwBnVGW5H833cdXqpfhf XbvJrmeo4R1vOP6oNktwj/rZknfaPehgDjJbz9HMEB0u0Ue9xQZrSXJ6MWxYLRIE39Df lGmCJAe++/MVks5ilQBZcPVQlSI2F2dAOCxJz8XVgpyZiVL7dBO4fJFLWnblreGxyZWd 3KWNDceQQifEK0wxbep7dkCGMXXQrgAEhGl7m0vNea65ogMLovNMU+spm2e5BrIMVu0K Cz3w== X-Received: by 10.112.130.138 with SMTP id oe10mr11106216lbb.1.1383927291047; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 08:14:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.129] (mau.donbass.com. [92.242.127.250]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ed8sm6913384lbc.11.2013.11.08.08.14.49 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 08 Nov 2013 08:14:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <527D0DF9.4030503@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 18:14:49 +0200 From: Volodymyr Kostyrko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "bsd@todoo.biz" , Liste FreeBSD Subject: Re: Running gpart boot code after upgrade zfs pool to feature flag ? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 16:14:53 -0000 07.11.2013 22:45, bsd@todoo.biz wrote: > My gpart config is as follow : > > >> tube:root 21:11:05 /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/poudriere screen # gpart show >> => 34 1677721533 da0 GPT (800G) >> 34 128 1 freebsd-boot (64k) >> 162 6 - free - (3.0k) >> 168 8388608 2 freebsd-swap (4.0G) >> 8388776 1669332784 3 freebsd-zfs (796G) >> 1677721560 7 - free - (3.5k) >> >> => 63 113246145 da1 MBR (54G) >> 63 113242122 1 freebsd [active] (54G) >> 113242185 4023 - free - (2M) >> >> => 0 113242122 da1s1 BSD (54G) >> 0 4194304 1 freebsd-ufs (2.0G) >> 4194304 8388608 2 freebsd-swap (4.0G) >> 12582912 4194304 4 freebsd-ufs (2.0G) >> 16777216 31457280 5 freebsd-ufs (15G) >> 48234496 65007626 6 freebsd-ufs (31G) >> > > Shall I run the command provided or not ? > > >> gpart bootcode -b /boot/pmbr -p /boot/gptzfsboot -i 1 da0 'da0' is a hardcoded string. It just matches for you. Same as the part number. cddl/contrib/opensolaris/cmd/zpool/zpool_main.c:4976 @^/stable/10 -- Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 8 20:37:20 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15EE5E61 for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 20:37:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aurfalien@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-x22e.google.com (mail-pa0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2D292F89 for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 20:37:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id kl14so1397072pab.33 for ; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 12:37:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=GjAmKI3shh5vwb9hJaTd6BxlIhxhAugbNiU/7+4yic0=; b=s417mUjP79wNGCBvt+g3903hx5JnT4qBRVmhuGLB2aZv9y44kX7ww88a2zEEyyTpaf bzxv2W9Ji59w1nAan66bdwwl7x6uy0iDz4SaDnl1m033SXGgl4P+jup2ro1+QTbSr8kq KoHBTo8vyRT9D0UvAGvh02PgXxT9X5j8mkI0piljCaMkoIZubKyBoHQ2zPEgXc/ETPui 5hy9woT9IbqeumEf4mF7dfCS1NUKvfFKKBzr3jMUluSGqPCE/PBOb9P02AbfVAH6iTSC KtfQA9P4QmVykFgJM9zwSOQCP2nXg3v2CC634Z3W/UDiAjIsHFUx1zwo5OWx6XYXK3Lf 0ubA== X-Received: by 10.68.203.73 with SMTP id ko9mr16912195pbc.170.1383943039386; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 12:37:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from briankrusicw.logan.tv ([64.17.255.138]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id hi5sm14033059pbb.43.2013.11.08.12.37.17 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 08 Nov 2013 12:37:17 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: CPU Turbo mode Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: aurfalien In-Reply-To: <20131031153757.GG63947@dan.emsphone.com> Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 12:37:16 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <4A2AEF45-5185-4ED7-98BD-B6975C79A5B9@gmail.com> References: <70EC0F10-FAD0-4EA6-8C1F-A95B1C786B7B@gmail.com> <20131031153757.GG63947@dan.emsphone.com> To: Dan Nelson X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 20:37:20 -0000 On Oct 31, 2013, at 8:37 AM, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Oct 30), aurfalien said: >> Hi all, >>=20 >> I've powerd enabled and see this message often when running powerd = -v; >>=20 >> current freq 2201 MHz ( 0), wanted freq 4402 MHz >>=20 >> Were is the 4402 value gotten from, is it a turbo value and if so, = why is >> it not boosting? >=20 > Depending on your settings, powerd will try and raise the clock rate = at > different rates based on system load. 4402 is simply double the = current > clock rate, which probably means your system is busy and powerd is = trying to > quickly raise the clock rate. It doesn't bother capping the target = value at > the maximum, though, since it'll find out a bit later in the code when = it > actually tries to set a new clockrate and realizes that it's already = at max. I found that my CPU, while at 2.2GHz standard can boost to 2.7GHz. However powerd never shows it at 2.7GHz. Is there a way to some how get the turbo mode working in FreeBSD? Its enabled in BIOS. - aurf= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 8 23:08:38 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 567E4D8D for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 23:08:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from drew@mykitchentable.net) Received: from blu0-omc4-s26.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc4-s26.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.111.165]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21BB9269A for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 23:08:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU0-SMTP153 ([65.55.111.136]) by blu0-omc4-s26.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 8 Nov 2013 15:07:30 -0800 X-TMN: [HK8hgV08ODAzBYWOlCl0ml6vC4ypYdsT] X-Originating-Email: [drew@mykitchentable.net] Message-ID: Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([69.62.230.77]) by BLU0-SMTP153.phx.gbl over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 8 Nov 2013 15:07:28 -0800 Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 15:07:14 -0800 From: Drew Tomlinson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Confirmation Of Drive Failure Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 131108-1, 11/08/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Nov 2013 23:07:28.0679 (UTC) FILETIME=[4BB89370:01CEDCD7] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 23:08:38 -0000 I've been running FBSD on this home server for about 13 years. Finally after a power outage, it will no longer boot. The main drives were two SCSI drives striped using gstripe. I am fairly certain da0 is dead and the reason it won't boot. I know there was a working IDE or IDE via firewire enclosure drive before the crash. I had backups on that drive made from Bacula and I'm hoping to be able to recover them. If I'm interpreting all of the below dmesg output correctly, I think I should have an ad1 drive that I can mount. I'm hoping someone can confirm or deny that and help me get it mounted if ada1 should be there. My version of FBSD on the box was 6.4. I am now booted from the 9.2 Live CD. I'm checking dmesg to see what devices are seen: da0 at ahc0 bus 0 scbus2 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da0: 11.626MB/s transfers (5.813MHz, offset 8, 16bit) da0: Command Queueing enabled da0: 8683MB (17783112 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 8683C) da1 at ahc0 bus 0 scbus2 target 2 lun 0 da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da1: 11.626MB/s transfers (5.813MHz, offset 8, 16bit) da1: Command Queueing enabled da1: 8683MB (17783112 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 8683C) cd0 at ata1 bus 0 scbus1 target 0 lun 0 cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device cd0: 16.700MB/s transfers (WDMA2, ATAPI 12bytes, PIO 65534bytes) cd0: cd present [274042 x 2048 byte records] ada0 at ata0 bus 0 scbus0 target 0 lun 0 ada0: ATA-5 device ada0: 33.300MB/s transfers (UDMA2, PIO 8192bytes) ada0: 76319MB (156301488 512 byte sectors: 15H 63S/T 16383C) ada0: Previously was known as ad0 ada1 at ata0 bus 0 scbus0 target 1 lun 0 ada1: ATA-0 device ada1: 3.300MB/s transfers (PIO0, PIO 8192bytes) ada1: 0MB (0 512 byte sectors: 16H 63S/T 16383C) ada1: Previously was known as ad1 SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! Thus if I'm reading this right, it's seeing two internal IDE drives, a CD drive, and two SCSI drives? Although I'm booted from the CD drive, apparently it is having problems based upon many of these messages: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 00 00 04 2e 78 00 00 01 00 (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): CAM status: SCSI Status Error (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI status: Check Condition (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI sense: ILLEGAL REQUEST asc:64,0 (Illegal mode for this track) (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Info: 0x42e78 (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Error 6, Unretryable error (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): cddone: got error 0x6 back (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 00 00 04 2e 78 00 00 01 00 Then lots of these messages which tells me ada0 drives is dead? (ada0:ata0:0:0:0): READ_DMA. ACB: c8 00 80 00 00 40 00 00 00 00 10 00 (ada0:ata0:0:0:0): CAM status: ATA Status Error (ada0:ata0:0:0:0): ATA status: 51 (DRDY SERV ERR), error: 40 (UNC ) (ada0:ata0:0:0:0): RES: 51 40 80 00 00 00 00 00 00 10 00 (ada0:ata0:0:0:0): Retrying command Then it looks like there is hope for the stripe: GEOM_STRIPE: Device data created (id=2880277341). GEOM_STRIPE: Disk da0s1d attached to data. GEOM_STRIPE: Disk da1s1d attached to data. GEOM_STRIPE: Device stripe/data activated. But then no hope as this sequence repeats itself: GEOM_STRIPE: Disk da0s1d removed from data. GEOM_STRIPE: Device stripe/data deactivated. GEOM_STRIPE: Disk da0s1d attached to data. GEOM_STRIPE: Device stripe/data activated. GEOM_STRIPE: Disk da0s1d removed from data. GEOM_STRIPE: Device stripe/data deactivated Then I load the sbp module to see if I have any drives in the firewire enclosure: fwohci0: port 0x1c00-0x1c7f mem 0xfc104000-0xfc1047ff irq 16 at device 10.0 on pci0 fwohci0: OHCI version 1.0 (ROM=1) fwohci0: No. of Isochronous channels is 8. fwohci0: EUI64 00:40:63:00:00:00:07:ff fwohci0: Phy 1394a available S400, 3 ports. fwohci0: Link S400, max_rec 2048 bytes. firewire0: on fwohci0 fwohci0: Initiate bus reset fwohci0: fwohci_intr_core: BUS reset fwohci0: fwohci_intr_core: node_id=0x00000001, SelfID Count=1, CYCLEMASTER mode firewire0: 2 nodes, maxhop <= 1 cable IRM irm(1) (me) firewire0: bus manager 1 firewire0: fw_explore_node: Pre 1394a-2000 detected firewire0: New S400 device ID:0030e002ee4000a6 sbp0: on firewire0 sbp0: sbp_show_sdev_info: sbp0:0:0: ordered:1 type:14 EUI:0030e002ee4000a6 node:0 speed:2 maxrec:8 sbp0: sbp_show_sdev_info: sbp0:0:0 'Oxford ' '911 ' '000037' sbp0: sbp_show_sdev_info: sbp0:0:1: ordered:1 type:14 EUI:0030e002ee4000a6 node:0 speed:2 maxrec:8 sbp0: sbp_show_sdev_info: sbp0:0:1 'Oxford ' '911 ' '000037' sbp0: sbp_timeout:sbp0:0:0 request timeout(cmd orb:0x282fa154) ... agent reset (probe0:sbp0:0:0:0): INQUIRY. CDB: 12 00 00 00 24 00 (probe0:sbp0:0:0:0): CAM status: Command timeout (probe0:sbp0:0:0:0): Retrying command I suspect this means no working drives were found in the firewire enclosure? So I check /dev and see if it sees ad1: root@:~ # ll /dev/ad* lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4 Nov 2 18:07 /dev/ad0@ -> ada0 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 5 Nov 8 13:38 /dev/ad0d@ -> ada0d lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4 Nov 2 18:07 /dev/ad1@ -> ada1 crw-r----- 1 root operator 0x59 Nov 8 13:36 /dev/ada0 crw-r----- 1 root operator 0x75 Nov 8 13:37 /dev/ada0d crw-r----- 1 root operator 0x5b Nov 2 18:07 /dev/ada1 root@:~ # So I created /mnt/data and tried to mount ada1: root@:~ # mount /dev/ada1 /mnt/data mount: /dev/ada1: Device not configured So then I try: root@:~ # bsdlabel /dev/ada1 bsdlabel: cannot get disk geometry: No such file or directory So does this mean I really don't have an ada1 drive? Or is there some step I'm missing to make it accessible. I really appreciate you reading this far and any help you might give. Cheers, Drew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 8 23:30:38 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F05862A7 for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 23:30:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) Received: from webmail.dweimer.net (24-240-198-187.static.stls.mo.charter.com [24.240.198.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9361327C6 for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 23:30:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.dweimer.net (webmail.dweimer.local [192.168.5.2]) by webmail.dweimer.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rA8NUTJZ072180 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 17:30:29 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 17:30:29 -0600 From: dweimer To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Confirmation Of Drive Failure Organization: dweimer.net Mail-Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <8f6c8132c42415d4dc955e24403beeb3@dweimer.net> X-Sender: dweimer@dweimer.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 23:30:38 -0000 On 11/08/2013 5:07 pm, Drew Tomlinson wrote: > I've been running FBSD on this home server for about 13 years. Finally > after a power outage, it will no longer boot. > > The main drives were two SCSI drives striped using gstripe. I am > fairly certain da0 is dead and the reason it won't boot. > > I know there was a working IDE or IDE via firewire enclosure drive > before the crash. I had backups on that drive made from Bacula and > I'm hoping to be able to recover them. > > If I'm interpreting all of the below dmesg output correctly, I think I > should have an ad1 drive that I can mount. I'm hoping someone can > confirm or deny that and help me get it mounted if ada1 should be > there. > > My version of FBSD on the box was 6.4. I am now booted from the 9.2 > Live CD. > > I'm checking dmesg to see what devices are seen: > > da0 at ahc0 bus 0 scbus2 target 0 lun 0 > da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device > da0: 11.626MB/s transfers (5.813MHz, offset 8, 16bit) > da0: Command Queueing enabled > da0: 8683MB (17783112 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 8683C) > da1 at ahc0 bus 0 scbus2 target 2 lun 0 > da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device > da1: 11.626MB/s transfers (5.813MHz, offset 8, 16bit) > da1: Command Queueing enabled > da1: 8683MB (17783112 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 8683C) > cd0 at ata1 bus 0 scbus1 target 0 lun 0 > cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device > cd0: 16.700MB/s transfers (WDMA2, ATAPI 12bytes, PIO 65534bytes) > cd0: cd present [274042 x 2048 byte records] > ada0 at ata0 bus 0 scbus0 target 0 lun 0 > ada0: ATA-5 device > ada0: 33.300MB/s transfers (UDMA2, PIO 8192bytes) > ada0: 76319MB (156301488 512 byte sectors: 15H 63S/T 16383C) > ada0: Previously was known as ad0 > ada1 at ata0 bus 0 scbus0 target 1 lun 0 > ada1: ATA-0 device > ada1: 3.300MB/s transfers (PIO0, PIO 8192bytes) > ada1: 0MB (0 512 byte sectors: 16H 63S/T 16383C) > ada1: Previously was known as ad1 > SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! > > Thus if I'm reading this right, it's seeing two internal IDE drives, a > CD drive, and two SCSI drives? > > Although I'm booted from the CD drive, apparently it is having > problems based upon many of these messages: > > (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 00 00 04 2e 78 00 00 01 00 > (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): CAM status: SCSI Status Error > (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI status: Check Condition > (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI sense: ILLEGAL REQUEST asc:64,0 (Illegal mode > for this track) > (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Info: 0x42e78 > (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Error 6, Unretryable error > (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): cddone: got error 0x6 back > (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 00 00 04 2e 78 00 00 01 00 > > Then lots of these messages which tells me ada0 drives is dead? > > (ada0:ata0:0:0:0): READ_DMA. ACB: c8 00 80 00 00 40 00 00 00 00 10 00 > (ada0:ata0:0:0:0): CAM status: ATA Status Error > (ada0:ata0:0:0:0): ATA status: 51 (DRDY SERV ERR), error: 40 (UNC ) > (ada0:ata0:0:0:0): RES: 51 40 80 00 00 00 00 00 00 10 00 > (ada0:ata0:0:0:0): Retrying command > > Then it looks like there is hope for the stripe: > > GEOM_STRIPE: Device data created (id=2880277341). > GEOM_STRIPE: Disk da0s1d attached to data. > GEOM_STRIPE: Disk da1s1d attached to data. > GEOM_STRIPE: Device stripe/data activated. > > But then no hope as this sequence repeats itself: > > GEOM_STRIPE: Disk da0s1d removed from data. > GEOM_STRIPE: Device stripe/data deactivated. > GEOM_STRIPE: Disk da0s1d attached to data. > GEOM_STRIPE: Device stripe/data activated. > GEOM_STRIPE: Disk da0s1d removed from data. > GEOM_STRIPE: Device stripe/data deactivated > > Then I load the sbp module to see if I have any drives in the firewire > enclosure: > > fwohci0: port 0x1c00-0x1c7f mem > 0xfc104000-0xfc1047ff irq > 16 at device 10.0 on pci0 > fwohci0: OHCI version 1.0 (ROM=1) > fwohci0: No. of Isochronous channels is 8. > fwohci0: EUI64 00:40:63:00:00:00:07:ff > fwohci0: Phy 1394a available S400, 3 ports. > fwohci0: Link S400, max_rec 2048 bytes. > firewire0: on fwohci0 > fwohci0: Initiate bus reset > fwohci0: fwohci_intr_core: BUS reset > fwohci0: fwohci_intr_core: node_id=0x00000001, SelfID Count=1, > CYCLEMASTER mode > firewire0: 2 nodes, maxhop <= 1 cable IRM irm(1) (me) > firewire0: bus manager 1 > firewire0: fw_explore_node: Pre 1394a-2000 detected > firewire0: New S400 device ID:0030e002ee4000a6 > sbp0: on firewire0 > sbp0: sbp_show_sdev_info: sbp0:0:0: ordered:1 type:14 > EUI:0030e002ee4000a6 node:0 speed:2 maxrec:8 > sbp0: sbp_show_sdev_info: sbp0:0:0 'Oxford ' '911 ' '000037' > sbp0: sbp_show_sdev_info: sbp0:0:1: ordered:1 type:14 > EUI:0030e002ee4000a6 node:0 speed:2 maxrec:8 > sbp0: sbp_show_sdev_info: sbp0:0:1 'Oxford ' '911 ' '000037' > sbp0: sbp_timeout:sbp0:0:0 request timeout(cmd orb:0x282fa154) ... > agent reset > (probe0:sbp0:0:0:0): INQUIRY. CDB: 12 00 00 00 24 00 > (probe0:sbp0:0:0:0): CAM status: Command timeout > (probe0:sbp0:0:0:0): Retrying command > > I suspect this means no working drives were found in the firewire > enclosure? > > So I check /dev and see if it sees ad1: > > root@:~ # ll /dev/ad* > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4 Nov 2 18:07 /dev/ad0@ -> ada0 > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 5 Nov 8 13:38 /dev/ad0d@ -> ada0d > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4 Nov 2 18:07 /dev/ad1@ -> ada1 > crw-r----- 1 root operator 0x59 Nov 8 13:36 /dev/ada0 > crw-r----- 1 root operator 0x75 Nov 8 13:37 /dev/ada0d > crw-r----- 1 root operator 0x5b Nov 2 18:07 /dev/ada1 > root@:~ # > > So I created /mnt/data and tried to mount ada1: > > root@:~ # mount /dev/ada1 /mnt/data > mount: /dev/ada1: Device not configured > > So then I try: > > root@:~ # bsdlabel /dev/ada1 > bsdlabel: cannot get disk geometry: No such file or directory > > So does this mean I really don't have an ada1 drive? Or is there some > step I'm missing to make it accessible. > > I really appreciate you reading this far and any help you might give. > > Cheers, > > Drew > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" ada1 at ata0 bus 0 scbus0 target 1 lun 0 ada1: ATA-0 device ada1: 3.300MB/s transfers (PIO0, PIO 8192bytes) <<== really 3.3MB/S, that's slower than it should be. ada1: 0MB (0 512 byte sectors: 16H 63S/T 16383C) <<== Shows 0MB size, that's Definitely not right. ada1: Previously was known as ad1 I think either the IDE drive is bad as well, or its not compatible with the IDE controller. -- Thanks, Dean E. Weimer http://www.dweimer.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 8 23:50:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99C5C59F for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 23:50:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-x22c.google.com (mail-pa0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 723CB28B9 for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 23:50:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id fb1so2903555pad.3 for ; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 15:50:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=8KvbQfHifN9G33cXbroxLjeGOJ5gbhWTNc7eAY+dcSs=; b=DLlOH4AvJIRf5NyWi5d7Xgq+yB9fMmRcgHRUkBbyYokLJUuzHSGAll9Ek+00KCTdGv EVLMDmbmxOeh54iTMnrm6qMz+oyObN5qe209zr6vevkB3sHz8nPOl95CzHh91LxOzFnC I8Apcekof9diMhSH3I2JoX3GbFSOUzVn+dPutkdonyWtze5MSZVo+vMHpmnmwPxI3EUt ScGJv6KxPvXPB031fNkUz9LiBfTZhxQqZefuCxqshnCddUF0wsylTQI47Q9QAwM6hlkg LSslJVQDfaPeZYbNDNsIn5vQ5uZpJEd7bFxOmVTW+ZRip+bAlNUpE8mZZNxVYKlRutQJ k2JQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.231.42 with SMTP id td10mr17939726pac.144.1383954601874; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 15:50:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.92.79 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 15:50:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8f6c8132c42415d4dc955e24403beeb3@dweimer.net> References: <8f6c8132c42415d4dc955e24403beeb3@dweimer.net> Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 17:50:01 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Confirmation Of Drive Failure From: Adam Vande More To: dweimer@dweimer.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 23:50:02 -0000 On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 5:30 PM, dweimer wrote: > On 11/08/2013 5:07 pm, Drew Tomlinson wrote: > >> I've been running FBSD on this home server for about 13 years. Finally >> after a power outage, it will no longer boot. >> >> The main drives were two SCSI drives striped using gstripe. I am >> fairly certain da0 is dead and the reason it won't boot. >> >> I know there was a working IDE or IDE via firewire enclosure drive >> before the crash. I had backups on that drive made from Bacula and >> I'm hoping to be able to recover them. >> >> If I'm interpreting all of the below dmesg output correctly, I think I >> should have an ad1 drive that I can mount. I'm hoping someone can >> confirm or deny that and help me get it mounted if ada1 should be >> there. >> >> My version of FBSD on the box was 6.4. I am now booted from the 9.2 Live >> CD. >> >> I'm checking dmesg to see what devices are seen: >> >> da0 at ahc0 bus 0 scbus2 target 0 lun 0 >> da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device >> da0: 11.626MB/s transfers (5.813MHz, offset 8, 16bit) >> da0: Command Queueing enabled >> da0: 8683MB (17783112 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 8683C) >> da1 at ahc0 bus 0 scbus2 target 2 lun 0 >> da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device >> da1: 11.626MB/s transfers (5.813MHz, offset 8, 16bit) >> da1: Command Queueing enabled >> da1: 8683MB (17783112 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 8683C) >> cd0 at ata1 bus 0 scbus1 target 0 lun 0 >> cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device >> cd0: 16.700MB/s transfers (WDMA2, ATAPI 12bytes, PIO 65534bytes) >> cd0: cd present [274042 x 2048 byte records] >> ada0 at ata0 bus 0 scbus0 target 0 lun 0 >> ada0: ATA-5 device >> ada0: 33.300MB/s transfers (UDMA2, PIO 8192bytes) >> ada0: 76319MB (156301488 512 byte sectors: 15H 63S/T 16383C) >> ada0: Previously was known as ad0 >> ada1 at ata0 bus 0 scbus0 target 1 lun 0 >> ada1: ATA-0 device >> ada1: 3.300MB/s transfers (PIO0, PIO 8192bytes) >> ada1: 0MB (0 512 byte sectors: 16H 63S/T 16383C) >> ada1: Previously was known as ad1 >> SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! >> >> Thus if I'm reading this right, it's seeing two internal IDE drives, a >> CD drive, and two SCSI drives? >> >> Although I'm booted from the CD drive, apparently it is having >> problems based upon many of these messages: >> >> (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 00 00 04 2e 78 00 00 01 00 >> (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): CAM status: SCSI Status Error >> (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI status: Check Condition >> (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI sense: ILLEGAL REQUEST asc:64,0 (Illegal mode >> for this track) >> (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Info: 0x42e78 >> (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Error 6, Unretryable error >> (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): cddone: got error 0x6 back >> (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 00 00 04 2e 78 00 00 01 00 >> >> Then lots of these messages which tells me ada0 drives is dead? >> >> (ada0:ata0:0:0:0): READ_DMA. ACB: c8 00 80 00 00 40 00 00 00 00 10 00 >> (ada0:ata0:0:0:0): CAM status: ATA Status Error >> (ada0:ata0:0:0:0): ATA status: 51 (DRDY SERV ERR), error: 40 (UNC ) >> (ada0:ata0:0:0:0): RES: 51 40 80 00 00 00 00 00 00 10 00 >> (ada0:ata0:0:0:0): Retrying command >> >> Then it looks like there is hope for the stripe: >> >> GEOM_STRIPE: Device data created (id=2880277341). >> GEOM_STRIPE: Disk da0s1d attached to data. >> GEOM_STRIPE: Disk da1s1d attached to data. >> GEOM_STRIPE: Device stripe/data activated. >> >> But then no hope as this sequence repeats itself: >> >> GEOM_STRIPE: Disk da0s1d removed from data. >> GEOM_STRIPE: Device stripe/data deactivated. >> GEOM_STRIPE: Disk da0s1d attached to data. >> GEOM_STRIPE: Device stripe/data activated. >> GEOM_STRIPE: Disk da0s1d removed from data. >> GEOM_STRIPE: Device stripe/data deactivated >> >> Then I load the sbp module to see if I have any drives in the firewire >> enclosure: >> >> fwohci0: port 0x1c00-0x1c7f mem >> 0xfc104000-0xfc1047ff irq >> 16 at device 10.0 on pci0 >> fwohci0: OHCI version 1.0 (ROM=1) >> fwohci0: No. of Isochronous channels is 8. >> fwohci0: EUI64 00:40:63:00:00:00:07:ff >> fwohci0: Phy 1394a available S400, 3 ports. >> fwohci0: Link S400, max_rec 2048 bytes. >> firewire0: on fwohci0 >> fwohci0: Initiate bus reset >> fwohci0: fwohci_intr_core: BUS reset >> fwohci0: fwohci_intr_core: node_id=0x00000001, SelfID Count=1, >> CYCLEMASTER mode >> firewire0: 2 nodes, maxhop <= 1 cable IRM irm(1) (me) >> firewire0: bus manager 1 >> firewire0: fw_explore_node: Pre 1394a-2000 detected >> firewire0: New S400 device ID:0030e002ee4000a6 >> sbp0: on firewire0 >> sbp0: sbp_show_sdev_info: sbp0:0:0: ordered:1 type:14 >> EUI:0030e002ee4000a6 node:0 speed:2 maxrec:8 >> sbp0: sbp_show_sdev_info: sbp0:0:0 'Oxford ' '911 ' '000037' >> sbp0: sbp_show_sdev_info: sbp0:0:1: ordered:1 type:14 >> EUI:0030e002ee4000a6 node:0 speed:2 maxrec:8 >> sbp0: sbp_show_sdev_info: sbp0:0:1 'Oxford ' '911 ' '000037' >> sbp0: sbp_timeout:sbp0:0:0 request timeout(cmd orb:0x282fa154) ... agent >> reset >> (probe0:sbp0:0:0:0): INQUIRY. CDB: 12 00 00 00 24 00 >> (probe0:sbp0:0:0:0): CAM status: Command timeout >> (probe0:sbp0:0:0:0): Retrying command >> >> I suspect this means no working drives were found in the firewire >> enclosure? >> >> So I check /dev and see if it sees ad1: >> >> root@:~ # ll /dev/ad* >> lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4 Nov 2 18:07 /dev/ad0@ -> ada0 >> lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 5 Nov 8 13:38 /dev/ad0d@ -> ada0d >> lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4 Nov 2 18:07 /dev/ad1@ -> ada1 >> crw-r----- 1 root operator 0x59 Nov 8 13:36 /dev/ada0 >> crw-r----- 1 root operator 0x75 Nov 8 13:37 /dev/ada0d >> crw-r----- 1 root operator 0x5b Nov 2 18:07 /dev/ada1 >> root@:~ # >> >> So I created /mnt/data and tried to mount ada1: >> >> root@:~ # mount /dev/ada1 /mnt/data >> mount: /dev/ada1: Device not configured >> >> So then I try: >> >> root@:~ # bsdlabel /dev/ada1 >> bsdlabel: cannot get disk geometry: No such file or directory >> >> So does this mean I really don't have an ada1 drive? Or is there some >> step I'm missing to make it accessible. >> >> I really appreciate you reading this far and any help you might give. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Drew >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- >> unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > ada1 at ata0 bus 0 scbus0 target 1 lun 0 > ada1: ATA-0 device > ada1: 3.300MB/s transfers (PIO0, PIO 8192bytes) <<== really 3.3MB/S, > that's slower than it should be. > ada1: 0MB (0 512 byte sectors: 16H 63S/T 16383C) <<== Shows 0MB size, > that's Definitely not right. > > ada1: Previously was known as ad1 > > I think either the IDE drive is bad as well, or its not compatible with > the IDE controller. Also regarding ada0, dangerously dedicated mode is not supported 8.x+ -- Adam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 9 00:08:37 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACF2D8D3 for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 00:08:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DEE829B6 for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 00:08:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rA908Rpe084912; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 17:08:27 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id rA908R0A084909; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 17:08:27 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 17:08:26 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: aurfalien Subject: Re: CPU Turbo mode In-Reply-To: <4A2AEF45-5185-4ED7-98BD-B6975C79A5B9@gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <70EC0F10-FAD0-4EA6-8C1F-A95B1C786B7B@gmail.com> <20131031153757.GG63947@dan.emsphone.com> <4A2AEF45-5185-4ED7-98BD-B6975C79A5B9@gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 08 Nov 2013 17:08:27 -0700 (MST) Cc: Dan Nelson , FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 00:08:37 -0000 On Fri, 8 Nov 2013, aurfalien wrote: > > On Oct 31, 2013, at 8:37 AM, Dan Nelson wrote: > >> In the last episode (Oct 30), aurfalien said: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I've powerd enabled and see this message often when running powerd -v; >>> >>> current freq 2201 MHz ( 0), wanted freq 4402 MHz >>> >>> Were is the 4402 value gotten from, is it a turbo value and if so, why is >>> it not boosting? >> >> Depending on your settings, powerd will try and raise the clock rate at >> different rates based on system load. 4402 is simply double the current >> clock rate, which probably means your system is busy and powerd is trying to >> quickly raise the clock rate. It doesn't bother capping the target value at >> the maximum, though, since it'll find out a bit later in the code when it >> actually tries to set a new clockrate and realizes that it's already at max. > > I found that my CPU, while at 2.2GHz standard can boost to 2.7GHz. > > However powerd never shows it at 2.7GHz. > > Is there a way to some how get the turbo mode working in FreeBSD? > > Its enabled in BIOS. When it shows 2201, it's in Turbo mode. I don't know if there is anywhere that shows the actual speed of the single core that is going faster. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 9 00:12:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B6FCA66; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 00:12:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qe0-x235.google.com (mail-qe0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c02::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BED742A02; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 00:12:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qe0-f53.google.com with SMTP id cy11so2666675qeb.12 for ; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 16:12:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ChIhUrSI5ffGaIHK3ZtCGYtjowFGYVTjXtJadgPAIps=; b=Ls0BC84V1tT4Mkna6rVD5Kb5i9e87VYj0TEYD9460ubvzL38FFKSm3JqOdkDT/z2Zv yznD6ijptYaLgWGZrgYcK64yKANyT0jZmIfH5AZZ4pMc8elX44zDz/HHNWAgoKr+QYnB 1JFH6mjw6VoipWIeH+BieuDUR3RHwUgrHIeAGEKqiw/7ULMBtnAvqBecTl/dXJu0L0aL N7VsKKCBzJ+Gv+Kzir151ygMswT8qyL2Lf93jJzChXXYQgCGT39oY72QITGXSU8DllYp QTinzd5co4fUwO7AGSpP4W6ycJj6q6C+AUgtaVZwbU27dKQrwCZYfHOrCB62gcb09cE6 7MsQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.49.71.207 with SMTP id x15mr26897541qeu.49.1383955920940; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 16:12:00 -0800 (PST) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.224.207.66 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 16:12:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <25C055B9-4A19-46C8-B78E-AC8BD6E00CD9@gmail.com> References: <1381600575.18393.33219025.5D7B78D0@webmail.messagingengine.com> <8CA809B3-1692-4760-A63F-9D7451EB49BD@gmail.com> <525D143B.50202@gmail.com> <1382285088.2462.36238881.1AA6BB17@webmail.messagingengine.com> <25C055B9-4A19-46C8-B78E-AC8BD6E00CD9@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 16:12:00 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: OVWxnGVMvAC2hUBFrLj-n8Z_CnA Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD, Centos and ZFS - SOLVED From: Adrian Chadd To: aurfalien Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 00:12:02 -0000 Hi! Sorry to resurrect this thread, but I'd like to understand what's going on under the hood. On 22 October 2013 16:40, aurfalien wrote: > OMG, what a relief... the ~30% diff in performance was due to a BIOS setting, in particular this one; > > Intel Turbo Boost Technology > Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Tech > > I disabled both. > > In fact, FreeBSD is showing a tad better now then CentOS. I have files if any one is interested in viewing. > > Thanks to all for the rather overwhelming response :) > > Actually it was good that hardly any one did as it forced me to debug the old fashioned way :) Would you mind testing out running powerd as suggested? Does that give you a performance boost? with this in /etc/rc.conf: performance_cpu_freq="HIGH" Thanks! -adrian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 9 00:14:27 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98485B29 for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 00:14:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 425522A23 for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 00:14:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rA90D5E5084967; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 17:13:05 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id rA90D5Wo084964; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 17:13:05 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 17:13:05 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Adam Vande More Subject: Re: Confirmation Of Drive Failure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <8f6c8132c42415d4dc955e24403beeb3@dweimer.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 08 Nov 2013 17:13:05 -0700 (MST) Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 00:14:27 -0000 On Fri, 8 Nov 2013, Adam Vande More wrote: > Also regarding ada0, dangerously dedicated mode is not supported 8.x+ AFAIK, it would still work, it's just not recommended. The installer memory stick images still use it, even on 10.0. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 9 00:18:51 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C981CD2E; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 00:18:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aurfalien@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pd0-x229.google.com (mail-pd0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93ED42A4E; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 00:18:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pd0-f169.google.com with SMTP id q10so2834499pdj.14 for ; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 16:18:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=/1yv9+IKdWUF+TV+qzEat5AUdPaBe8z4mu5vKNfQS74=; b=yYDUgnhUVvY14lQMCTy1UI9j+YMECGjBlaVGcR/RqjlgWFVpaKevmXMWfQ6H6+lSjx 4hDjCnjOHZwMDQN7nfdAKs6OAZB7br24ajf7MEitP0I5J7UrMeTFqf6njZ9QMLTbZWf2 LO7DTzcqs54SXtiM23t+67nzlXRVHi83HWcWnOOEMdbfN7THqi2Tspj+eS4jzw3WWmyL cRU4TC73VWYlz7bVIdVs/jyc3xgJQWyQckJTnBLzvTJMUEVNm59BXH3gZlENhgCac4RB Mki3GoK07Z1sqk2JxLcTulelZ+QSzZuA0ex9lOKmXE63/TvJuY0mAngAj7BZP4zDgWW4 ObjQ== X-Received: by 10.68.225.197 with SMTP id rm5mr17899687pbc.166.1383956331183; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 16:18:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from briankrusicw.logan.tv ([64.17.255.138]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id xs1sm17340775pac.7.2013.11.08.16.18.50 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 08 Nov 2013 16:18:50 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: FreeBSD, Centos and ZFS - SOLVED Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: aurfalien In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 16:18:48 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <26C1E8D6-B707-46D0-B5A5-A0C8FC6B835A@gmail.com> References: <1381600575.18393.33219025.5D7B78D0@webmail.messagingengine.com> <8CA809B3-1692-4760-A63F-9D7451EB49BD@gmail.com> <525D143B.50202@gmail.com> <1382285088.2462.36238881.1AA6BB17@webmail.messagingengine.com> <25C055B9-4A19-46C8-B78E-AC8BD6E00CD9@gmail.com> To: Adrian Chadd X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 00:18:51 -0000 Hi, Sure, I decided to run powerd with the following args; -a hiadaptive -p 25 And its running rather well. I will be trying the additional option you mentioned all those moons ago = next week; performance_cpu_freq=3D"HIGH" - aurf On Nov 8, 2013, at 4:12 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Hi! >=20 > Sorry to resurrect this thread, but I'd like to understand what's > going on under the hood. >=20 >=20 > On 22 October 2013 16:40, aurfalien wrote: >=20 >> OMG, what a relief... the ~30% diff in performance was due to a BIOS = setting, in particular this one; >>=20 >> Intel Turbo Boost Technology >> Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Tech >>=20 >> I disabled both. >>=20 >> In fact, FreeBSD is showing a tad better now then CentOS. I have = files if any one is interested in viewing. >>=20 >> Thanks to all for the rather overwhelming response :) >>=20 >> Actually it was good that hardly any one did as it forced me to debug = the old fashioned way :) >=20 > Would you mind testing out running powerd as suggested? Does that give > you a performance boost? >=20 > with this in /etc/rc.conf: >=20 > performance_cpu_freq=3D"HIGH" >=20 > Thanks! >=20 >=20 >=20 > -adrian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 9 00:19:57 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BA87DCB; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 00:19:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qe0-x22d.google.com (mail-qe0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c02::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE4862A5F; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 00:19:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qe0-f45.google.com with SMTP id 8so2698859qea.18 for ; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 16:19:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=MJ29pvkfTYCxjElzesLMFdZoz4/Wz8VnIaWsLdGeQt4=; b=hnDSTvfUJ3QWZHHcE89+3KoQNTeZrnSC+Y+18IQQq7NV6BKavUJvkECoKMHqmJH29h FRNIM5zCFlaqGNkJ13eHeNdf0iqOz0HUREULXmbYtcPfLEohfQLWz/77LYYlMHlupUE5 5DWbhEWw9NrZZfnIQKKIcMsslBvE21fNQmQVQzmSu60cyqjmm+NW8DKxX/cr7vHJKaJb lAzoef0wZaHON7fq2/lm1Cofg4HO1QeyhRY4x4PfPbyBPNIVzuRqrz6oVRtQTIiytRIs ml4FwsAKkbx+rCS2K7lKZZp0cSxxcIgCJ7GvOBh1IZzHIgXxFJfLqinC8Ebm3w2Zl2YK iTTg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.49.71.207 with SMTP id x15mr26940182qeu.49.1383956395458; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 16:19:55 -0800 (PST) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.224.207.66 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 16:19:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <26C1E8D6-B707-46D0-B5A5-A0C8FC6B835A@gmail.com> References: <1381600575.18393.33219025.5D7B78D0@webmail.messagingengine.com> <8CA809B3-1692-4760-A63F-9D7451EB49BD@gmail.com> <525D143B.50202@gmail.com> <1382285088.2462.36238881.1AA6BB17@webmail.messagingengine.com> <25C055B9-4A19-46C8-B78E-AC8BD6E00CD9@gmail.com> <26C1E8D6-B707-46D0-B5A5-A0C8FC6B835A@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 16:19:55 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Q0xTTGYPtv0qwg2I2lU0IrJVopE Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD, Centos and ZFS - SOLVED From: Adrian Chadd To: aurfalien Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 00:19:57 -0000 On 8 November 2013 16:18, aurfalien wrote: > Hi, > > Sure, I decided to run powerd with the following args; > > -a hiadaptive -p 25 > > And its running rather well. > > I will be trying the additional option you mentioned all those moons ago next week; > > performance_cpu_freq="HIGH" Just to be clear - you did this _and_ you re-enabled speedstep/turboboost in the BIOS? -adrian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 9 00:25:41 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C45D9FA0 for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 00:25:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from drew@mykitchentable.net) Received: from blu0-omc1-s7.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc1-s7.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.116.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CE102AD3 for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 00:25:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU0-SMTP184 ([65.55.116.7]) by blu0-omc1-s7.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 8 Nov 2013 16:24:35 -0800 X-TMN: [OXoDr+gk0Nw500UachV4P1r/RH+EEJzM] X-Originating-Email: [drew@mykitchentable.net] Message-ID: Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([69.62.230.77]) by BLU0-SMTP184.phx.gbl over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 8 Nov 2013 16:24:31 -0800 Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 16:24:23 -0800 From: Drew Tomlinson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dweimer@dweimer.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Confirmation Of Drive Failure References: <8f6c8132c42415d4dc955e24403beeb3@dweimer.net> In-Reply-To: <8f6c8132c42415d4dc955e24403beeb3@dweimer.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 131108-1, 11/08/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Nov 2013 00:24:32.0241 (UTC) FILETIME=[0F942610:01CEDCE2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 00:25:41 -0000 On 11/8/2013 3:30 PM, dweimer wrote: > On 11/08/2013 5:07 pm, Drew Tomlinson wrote: >> I've been running FBSD on this home server for about 13 years. Finally >> after a power outage, it will no longer boot. >> >> The main drives were two SCSI drives striped using gstripe. I am >> fairly certain da0 is dead and the reason it won't boot. >> >> I know there was a working IDE or IDE via firewire enclosure drive >> before the crash. I had backups on that drive made from Bacula and >> I'm hoping to be able to recover them. >> >> If I'm interpreting all of the below dmesg output correctly, I think I >> should have an ad1 drive that I can mount. I'm hoping someone can >> confirm or deny that and help me get it mounted if ada1 should be >> there. >> >> My version of FBSD on the box was 6.4. I am now booted from the 9.2 >> Live CD. >> >> I'm checking dmesg to see what devices are seen: >> >> da0 at ahc0 bus 0 scbus2 target 0 lun 0 >> da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device >> da0: 11.626MB/s transfers (5.813MHz, offset 8, 16bit) >> da0: Command Queueing enabled >> da0: 8683MB (17783112 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 8683C) >> da1 at ahc0 bus 0 scbus2 target 2 lun 0 >> da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device >> da1: 11.626MB/s transfers (5.813MHz, offset 8, 16bit) >> da1: Command Queueing enabled >> da1: 8683MB (17783112 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 8683C) >> cd0 at ata1 bus 0 scbus1 target 0 lun 0 >> cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device >> cd0: 16.700MB/s transfers (WDMA2, ATAPI 12bytes, PIO 65534bytes) >> cd0: cd present [274042 x 2048 byte records] >> ada0 at ata0 bus 0 scbus0 target 0 lun 0 >> ada0: ATA-5 device >> ada0: 33.300MB/s transfers (UDMA2, PIO 8192bytes) >> ada0: 76319MB (156301488 512 byte sectors: 15H 63S/T 16383C) >> ada0: Previously was known as ad0 >> ada1 at ata0 bus 0 scbus0 target 1 lun 0 >> ada1: ATA-0 device >> ada1: 3.300MB/s transfers (PIO0, PIO 8192bytes) >> ada1: 0MB (0 512 byte sectors: 16H 63S/T 16383C) >> ada1: Previously was known as ad1 >> SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! >> >> Thus if I'm reading this right, it's seeing two internal IDE drives, a >> CD drive, and two SCSI drives? >> >> Although I'm booted from the CD drive, apparently it is having >> problems based upon many of these messages: >> >> (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 00 00 04 2e 78 00 00 01 00 >> (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): CAM status: SCSI Status Error >> (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI status: Check Condition >> (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI sense: ILLEGAL REQUEST asc:64,0 (Illegal mode >> for this track) >> (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Info: 0x42e78 >> (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Error 6, Unretryable error >> (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): cddone: got error 0x6 back >> (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 00 00 04 2e 78 00 00 01 00 >> >> Then lots of these messages which tells me ada0 drives is dead? >> >> (ada0:ata0:0:0:0): READ_DMA. ACB: c8 00 80 00 00 40 00 00 00 00 10 00 >> (ada0:ata0:0:0:0): CAM status: ATA Status Error >> (ada0:ata0:0:0:0): ATA status: 51 (DRDY SERV ERR), error: 40 (UNC ) >> (ada0:ata0:0:0:0): RES: 51 40 80 00 00 00 00 00 00 10 00 >> (ada0:ata0:0:0:0): Retrying command >> >> Then it looks like there is hope for the stripe: >> >> GEOM_STRIPE: Device data created (id=2880277341). >> GEOM_STRIPE: Disk da0s1d attached to data. >> GEOM_STRIPE: Disk da1s1d attached to data. >> GEOM_STRIPE: Device stripe/data activated. >> >> But then no hope as this sequence repeats itself: >> >> GEOM_STRIPE: Disk da0s1d removed from data. >> GEOM_STRIPE: Device stripe/data deactivated. >> GEOM_STRIPE: Disk da0s1d attached to data. >> GEOM_STRIPE: Device stripe/data activated. >> GEOM_STRIPE: Disk da0s1d removed from data. >> GEOM_STRIPE: Device stripe/data deactivated >> >> Then I load the sbp module to see if I have any drives in the firewire >> enclosure: >> >> fwohci0: port 0x1c00-0x1c7f mem >> 0xfc104000-0xfc1047ff irq >> 16 at device 10.0 on pci0 >> fwohci0: OHCI version 1.0 (ROM=1) >> fwohci0: No. of Isochronous channels is 8. >> fwohci0: EUI64 00:40:63:00:00:00:07:ff >> fwohci0: Phy 1394a available S400, 3 ports. >> fwohci0: Link S400, max_rec 2048 bytes. >> firewire0: on fwohci0 >> fwohci0: Initiate bus reset >> fwohci0: fwohci_intr_core: BUS reset >> fwohci0: fwohci_intr_core: node_id=0x00000001, SelfID Count=1, >> CYCLEMASTER mode >> firewire0: 2 nodes, maxhop <= 1 cable IRM irm(1) (me) >> firewire0: bus manager 1 >> firewire0: fw_explore_node: Pre 1394a-2000 detected >> firewire0: New S400 device ID:0030e002ee4000a6 >> sbp0: on firewire0 >> sbp0: sbp_show_sdev_info: sbp0:0:0: ordered:1 type:14 >> EUI:0030e002ee4000a6 node:0 speed:2 maxrec:8 >> sbp0: sbp_show_sdev_info: sbp0:0:0 'Oxford ' '911 ' '000037' >> sbp0: sbp_show_sdev_info: sbp0:0:1: ordered:1 type:14 >> EUI:0030e002ee4000a6 node:0 speed:2 maxrec:8 >> sbp0: sbp_show_sdev_info: sbp0:0:1 'Oxford ' '911 ' '000037' >> sbp0: sbp_timeout:sbp0:0:0 request timeout(cmd orb:0x282fa154) ... >> agent reset >> (probe0:sbp0:0:0:0): INQUIRY. CDB: 12 00 00 00 24 00 >> (probe0:sbp0:0:0:0): CAM status: Command timeout >> (probe0:sbp0:0:0:0): Retrying command >> >> I suspect this means no working drives were found in the firewire >> enclosure? >> >> So I check /dev and see if it sees ad1: >> >> root@:~ # ll /dev/ad* >> lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4 Nov 2 18:07 /dev/ad0@ -> ada0 >> lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 5 Nov 8 13:38 /dev/ad0d@ -> ada0d >> lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4 Nov 2 18:07 /dev/ad1@ -> ada1 >> crw-r----- 1 root operator 0x59 Nov 8 13:36 /dev/ada0 >> crw-r----- 1 root operator 0x75 Nov 8 13:37 /dev/ada0d >> crw-r----- 1 root operator 0x5b Nov 2 18:07 /dev/ada1 >> root@:~ # >> >> So I created /mnt/data and tried to mount ada1: >> >> root@:~ # mount /dev/ada1 /mnt/data >> mount: /dev/ada1: Device not configured >> >> So then I try: >> >> root@:~ # bsdlabel /dev/ada1 >> bsdlabel: cannot get disk geometry: No such file or directory >> >> So does this mean I really don't have an ada1 drive? Or is there some >> step I'm missing to make it accessible. >> >> I really appreciate you reading this far and any help you might give. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Drew >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > ada1 at ata0 bus 0 scbus0 target 1 lun 0 > ada1: ATA-0 device > ada1: 3.300MB/s transfers (PIO0, PIO 8192bytes) <<== really 3.3MB/S, > that's slower than it should be. > ada1: 0MB (0 512 byte sectors: 16H 63S/T 16383C) <<== Shows 0MB size, > that's Definitely not right. > ada1: Previously was known as ad1 > > I think either the IDE drive is bad as well, or its not compatible with > the IDE controller. > Thanks for your input. This whole system is really old. The drive above is an 80 GB drive that was put in place back when 80 GB drives were huge. In fact I had 4 of them at one time. Two internal and two in a firewire enclosure. Over time, drives died but by then drives had gotten much bigger and I was storing in other drives on my network. Thus of the 4 drives that worked at one point, I had one left and was dumping local system backups to it via Bacula. But in any event and whatever the settings, they have not changed in at least 10 years. Probably ada1 is one of the dead drives. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 9 00:30:15 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DC43196 for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 00:30:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from drew@mykitchentable.net) Received: from blu0-omc1-s18.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc1-s18.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.116.29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E97612B0D for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 00:30:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU0-SMTP117 ([65.55.116.7]) by blu0-omc1-s18.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 8 Nov 2013 16:29:07 -0800 X-TMN: [SaUVF7r5D9CFDKjbTy87yeSL0iI24eZT] X-Originating-Email: [drew@mykitchentable.net] Message-ID: Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([69.62.230.77]) by BLU0-SMTP117.phx.gbl over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 8 Nov 2013 16:29:04 -0800 Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 16:28:55 -0800 From: Drew Tomlinson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adam Vande More , dweimer@dweimer.net Subject: Re: Confirmation Of Drive Failure References: <8f6c8132c42415d4dc955e24403beeb3@dweimer.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 131108-1, 11/08/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Nov 2013 00:29:05.0134 (UTC) FILETIME=[B23C50E0:01CEDCE2] Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 00:30:15 -0000 On 11/8/2013 3:50 PM, Adam Vande More wrote: > On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 5:30 PM, dweimer wrote: > >> On 11/08/2013 5:07 pm, Drew Tomlinson wrote: >> >>> I've been running FBSD on this home server for about 13 years. Finally >>> after a power outage, it will no longer boot. >>> >>> The main drives were two SCSI drives striped using gstripe. I am >>> fairly certain da0 is dead and the reason it won't boot. >>> >>> I know there was a working IDE or IDE via firewire enclosure drive >>> before the crash. I had backups on that drive made from Bacula and >>> I'm hoping to be able to recover them. >>> >>> If I'm interpreting all of the below dmesg output correctly, I think I >>> should have an ad1 drive that I can mount. I'm hoping someone can >>> confirm or deny that and help me get it mounted if ada1 should be >>> there. >>> >>> My version of FBSD on the box was 6.4. I am now booted from the 9.2 Live >>> CD. >>> >>> I'm checking dmesg to see what devices are seen: >>> >>> da0 at ahc0 bus 0 scbus2 target 0 lun 0 >>> da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device >>> da0: 11.626MB/s transfers (5.813MHz, offset 8, 16bit) >>> da0: Command Queueing enabled >>> da0: 8683MB (17783112 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 8683C) >>> da1 at ahc0 bus 0 scbus2 target 2 lun 0 >>> da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device >>> da1: 11.626MB/s transfers (5.813MHz, offset 8, 16bit) >>> da1: Command Queueing enabled >>> da1: 8683MB (17783112 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 8683C) >>> cd0 at ata1 bus 0 scbus1 target 0 lun 0 >>> cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device >>> cd0: 16.700MB/s transfers (WDMA2, ATAPI 12bytes, PIO 65534bytes) >>> cd0: cd present [274042 x 2048 byte records] >>> ada0 at ata0 bus 0 scbus0 target 0 lun 0 >>> ada0: ATA-5 device >>> ada0: 33.300MB/s transfers (UDMA2, PIO 8192bytes) >>> ada0: 76319MB (156301488 512 byte sectors: 15H 63S/T 16383C) >>> ada0: Previously was known as ad0 >>> ada1 at ata0 bus 0 scbus0 target 1 lun 0 >>> ada1: ATA-0 device >>> ada1: 3.300MB/s transfers (PIO0, PIO 8192bytes) >>> ada1: 0MB (0 512 byte sectors: 16H 63S/T 16383C) >>> ada1: Previously was known as ad1 >>> SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! >>> >>> Thus if I'm reading this right, it's seeing two internal IDE drives, a >>> CD drive, and two SCSI drives? >>> >>> Although I'm booted from the CD drive, apparently it is having >>> problems based upon many of these messages: >>> >>> (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 00 00 04 2e 78 00 00 01 00 >>> (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): CAM status: SCSI Status Error >>> (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI status: Check Condition >>> (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI sense: ILLEGAL REQUEST asc:64,0 (Illegal mode >>> for this track) >>> (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Info: 0x42e78 >>> (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Error 6, Unretryable error >>> (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): cddone: got error 0x6 back >>> (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 00 00 04 2e 78 00 00 01 00 >>> >>> Then lots of these messages which tells me ada0 drives is dead? >>> >>> (ada0:ata0:0:0:0): READ_DMA. ACB: c8 00 80 00 00 40 00 00 00 00 10 00 >>> (ada0:ata0:0:0:0): CAM status: ATA Status Error >>> (ada0:ata0:0:0:0): ATA status: 51 (DRDY SERV ERR), error: 40 (UNC ) >>> (ada0:ata0:0:0:0): RES: 51 40 80 00 00 00 00 00 00 10 00 >>> (ada0:ata0:0:0:0): Retrying command >>> >>> Then it looks like there is hope for the stripe: >>> >>> GEOM_STRIPE: Device data created (id=2880277341). >>> GEOM_STRIPE: Disk da0s1d attached to data. >>> GEOM_STRIPE: Disk da1s1d attached to data. >>> GEOM_STRIPE: Device stripe/data activated. >>> >>> But then no hope as this sequence repeats itself: >>> >>> GEOM_STRIPE: Disk da0s1d removed from data. >>> GEOM_STRIPE: Device stripe/data deactivated. >>> GEOM_STRIPE: Disk da0s1d attached to data. >>> GEOM_STRIPE: Device stripe/data activated. >>> GEOM_STRIPE: Disk da0s1d removed from data. >>> GEOM_STRIPE: Device stripe/data deactivated >>> >>> Then I load the sbp module to see if I have any drives in the firewire >>> enclosure: >>> >>> fwohci0: port 0x1c00-0x1c7f mem >>> 0xfc104000-0xfc1047ff irq >>> 16 at device 10.0 on pci0 >>> fwohci0: OHCI version 1.0 (ROM=1) >>> fwohci0: No. of Isochronous channels is 8. >>> fwohci0: EUI64 00:40:63:00:00:00:07:ff >>> fwohci0: Phy 1394a available S400, 3 ports. >>> fwohci0: Link S400, max_rec 2048 bytes. >>> firewire0: on fwohci0 >>> fwohci0: Initiate bus reset >>> fwohci0: fwohci_intr_core: BUS reset >>> fwohci0: fwohci_intr_core: node_id=0x00000001, SelfID Count=1, >>> CYCLEMASTER mode >>> firewire0: 2 nodes, maxhop <= 1 cable IRM irm(1) (me) >>> firewire0: bus manager 1 >>> firewire0: fw_explore_node: Pre 1394a-2000 detected >>> firewire0: New S400 device ID:0030e002ee4000a6 >>> sbp0: on firewire0 >>> sbp0: sbp_show_sdev_info: sbp0:0:0: ordered:1 type:14 >>> EUI:0030e002ee4000a6 node:0 speed:2 maxrec:8 >>> sbp0: sbp_show_sdev_info: sbp0:0:0 'Oxford ' '911 ' '000037' >>> sbp0: sbp_show_sdev_info: sbp0:0:1: ordered:1 type:14 >>> EUI:0030e002ee4000a6 node:0 speed:2 maxrec:8 >>> sbp0: sbp_show_sdev_info: sbp0:0:1 'Oxford ' '911 ' '000037' >>> sbp0: sbp_timeout:sbp0:0:0 request timeout(cmd orb:0x282fa154) ... agent >>> reset >>> (probe0:sbp0:0:0:0): INQUIRY. CDB: 12 00 00 00 24 00 >>> (probe0:sbp0:0:0:0): CAM status: Command timeout >>> (probe0:sbp0:0:0:0): Retrying command >>> >>> I suspect this means no working drives were found in the firewire >>> enclosure? >>> >>> So I check /dev and see if it sees ad1: >>> >>> root@:~ # ll /dev/ad* >>> lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4 Nov 2 18:07 /dev/ad0@ -> ada0 >>> lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 5 Nov 8 13:38 /dev/ad0d@ -> ada0d >>> lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4 Nov 2 18:07 /dev/ad1@ -> ada1 >>> crw-r----- 1 root operator 0x59 Nov 8 13:36 /dev/ada0 >>> crw-r----- 1 root operator 0x75 Nov 8 13:37 /dev/ada0d >>> crw-r----- 1 root operator 0x5b Nov 2 18:07 /dev/ada1 >>> root@:~ # >>> >>> So I created /mnt/data and tried to mount ada1: >>> >>> root@:~ # mount /dev/ada1 /mnt/data >>> mount: /dev/ada1: Device not configured >>> >>> So then I try: >>> >>> root@:~ # bsdlabel /dev/ada1 >>> bsdlabel: cannot get disk geometry: No such file or directory >>> >>> So does this mean I really don't have an ada1 drive? Or is there some >>> step I'm missing to make it accessible. >>> >>> I really appreciate you reading this far and any help you might give. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Drew >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- >>> unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >> >> ada1 at ata0 bus 0 scbus0 target 1 lun 0 >> ada1: ATA-0 device >> ada1: 3.300MB/s transfers (PIO0, PIO 8192bytes) <<== really 3.3MB/S, >> that's slower than it should be. >> ada1: 0MB (0 512 byte sectors: 16H 63S/T 16383C) <<== Shows 0MB size, >> that's Definitely not right. >> >> ada1: Previously was known as ad1 >> >> I think either the IDE drive is bad as well, or its not compatible with >> the IDE controller. > > > Also regarding ada0, dangerously dedicated mode is not supported 8.x+ Thanks for your input. This box was first built using FBSD 3.x and had migrated over the years up to 6.4. I was always going to move it's functions to another box but it still handled all the services my home network needed just fine and it was so rock solid because it was on a HP e60 server. My other stuff was desktop grade and was not nearly as reliable. I knew this day would eventually come and ironically, I started looking for new server hardware about 3 weeks before the crash. Finally made purchase and new server arrived today. But unfortunately I guess I was just a bit too late in getting it migrated. Cheers, Drew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 9 00:30:25 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72712223; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 00:30:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aurfalien@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-x234.google.com (mail-pb0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C6B12B12; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 00:30:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pb0-f52.google.com with SMTP id rr4so2814092pbb.25 for ; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 16:30:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=YB3efh3ouToeyQ0AytAV9iEVY0i/JDtBYIAGf4fPZGM=; b=fZ2mIs4qKjvvfDegz9+VCKyfCM20HDq14fv8HLhcfhK7sgAj7Mto/wIJ68G14hSqsQ 65WAy0gwOY6DviLQI9Eoe6k+E5Kzv4MwC8IKXAoUCfMGdnowOwk4Qa7tuBV2QpsEJsz8 wRAI2Hu7CIUdoJL1RVY+Y/Q1vayzzi+UOV2lxxUfBW1eTlVclFw+AjWg+JV2UOVwNcXn VWz4L+G2TfjmVMcqMc4aQ1h7oKOm38S2sdlrp+OW+2KHnuymOMMj39wnSe0S9rSFWIc3 dITgC6jDTgWfidlcSz3GK04GTK5VVJtXNqK9AXCWKtDpYsf3Vkn27IrW/7DyGQTrKGw5 5aig== X-Received: by 10.68.232.132 with SMTP id to4mr17559291pbc.141.1383957024844; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 16:30:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from briankrusicw.logan.tv ([64.17.255.138]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id qz9sm14783983pbc.3.2013.11.08.16.30.23 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 08 Nov 2013 16:30:23 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: FreeBSD, Centos and ZFS - SOLVED Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: aurfalien In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 16:30:22 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <1381600575.18393.33219025.5D7B78D0@webmail.messagingengine.com> <8CA809B3-1692-4760-A63F-9D7451EB49BD@gmail.com> <525D143B.50202@gmail.com> <1382285088.2462.36238881.1AA6BB17@webmail.messagingengine.com> <25C055B9-4A19-46C8-B78E-AC8BD6E00CD9@gmail.com> <26C1E8D6-B707-46D0-B5A5-A0C8FC6B835A@gmail.com> To: Adrian Chadd X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 00:30:25 -0000 Yes, both enabled in BIOS however I just noticed only C3 is enabled. - aurf On Nov 8, 2013, at 4:19 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 8 November 2013 16:18, aurfalien wrote: >> Hi, >>=20 >> Sure, I decided to run powerd with the following args; >>=20 >> -a hiadaptive -p 25 >>=20 >> And its running rather well. >>=20 >> I will be trying the additional option you mentioned all those moons = ago next week; >>=20 >> performance_cpu_freq=3D"HIGH" >=20 > Just to be clear - you did this _and_ you re-enabled > speedstep/turboboost in the BIOS? >=20 >=20 > -adrian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 9 00:43:04 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3638B490 for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 00:43:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-x22a.google.com (mail-pb0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E4592BD2 for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 00:43:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pb0-f42.google.com with SMTP id jt11so2874740pbb.1 for ; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 16:43:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=HytVuFntFdG76oukBwOe0g4yBoBC97XqJ+ggtt182zM=; b=o5z8eTibW3AfD7vbBpSJ4Mau6fJe4pVOTObMRrcRwXoKhi7xepeWmoDJw5wqM1Lmul QcOgNmhb1Fy5PghLEg4RMZQ4vAAbCBDWjlgHr3Gjrvlp+E2SH9Oj90GIO8L4yNFtaxUr +oShVeW0b0iWE7cmEQwGUraWt5z0PFNiQ1Z7Td2ZRyR78mTVOv1e7Fy3+dpY0QXnrUXR KaOzxr1NXdGh13vgzoXBNurNrxqMiRFp9UwCxDA9Ujzh2IzX05viuLyxzTnCIoRa4Rpv UWfFToFT7IXL++zUujm+nSrgN5N8lWZub5SIcC/DC9ozHzwjA7K8V8tuBK25KbtSvyBC G6TQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.12.103 with SMTP id x7mr18857068pab.54.1383957783589; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 16:43:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.92.79 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 16:43:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <8f6c8132c42415d4dc955e24403beeb3@dweimer.net> Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 18:43:03 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Confirmation Of Drive Failure From: Adam Vande More To: Warren Block Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 00:43:04 -0000 On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Warren Block wrote: > On Fri, 8 Nov 2013, Adam Vande More wrote: > > Also regarding ada0, dangerously dedicated mode is not supported 8.x+ >> > > AFAIK, it would still work, it's just not recommended. The installer > memory stick images still use it, even on 10.0. > It was removed in 8.0R. The memstick image must be built in a flaky way, but it doesn't actually use the 'a' device to mount. -- Adam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 9 01:00:16 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7955673A; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 01:00:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qc0-x234.google.com (mail-qc0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26CED2C71; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 01:00:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f180.google.com with SMTP id e9so2436650qcy.11 for ; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 17:00:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=iIJrUjJGMguMyk6vbxFr7T5DGw+DyapcQ41LW6nPlnM=; b=SoCBsijGBbH+OsLjRTJ/DZWyTZT2XhLFkZAqXdvEX3GbeZvbzaqwjBjEaiukenlelb xGueVz8y5ZdkpnTjt3woJ6+j7Eu0FgA1NpsZ2IWegkbfViFWZNmBiQElUJg9gxvONV5O 2rK7v+LuqkmS3YmO5QyHxRpVe222svz8vDkYRUVBHT3Vt2VBwM7dwbW4LiJCAmASz4YF tVYkJb79TaMzAGo5HbBUMYkc6WvkIlOpHQisyUrCNQFfDaDzx3bzoiXW7cORy5+V1upl JlDjfbji+juXyHnbMPIqpzhaGJuD1nhKL/84qXIA5ndOxow+goarBAKrQ67iIKeBiJHl USuA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.49.35.144 with SMTP id h16mr27096522qej.35.1383958815349; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 17:00:15 -0800 (PST) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.224.207.66 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 17:00:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1381600575.18393.33219025.5D7B78D0@webmail.messagingengine.com> <8CA809B3-1692-4760-A63F-9D7451EB49BD@gmail.com> <525D143B.50202@gmail.com> <1382285088.2462.36238881.1AA6BB17@webmail.messagingengine.com> <25C055B9-4A19-46C8-B78E-AC8BD6E00CD9@gmail.com> <26C1E8D6-B707-46D0-B5A5-A0C8FC6B835A@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 17:00:15 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: s8K3iI3KuurRzOW987e-JDOmhU4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD, Centos and ZFS - SOLVED From: Adrian Chadd To: aurfalien Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 01:00:16 -0000 On 8 November 2013 16:30, aurfalien wrote: > Yes, both enabled in BIOS however I just noticed only C3 is enabled. Right. Thanks! -adrian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 9 01:06:44 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78A61815 for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 01:06:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27B8E2CCB for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 01:06:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rA915QAJ085297; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 18:05:26 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id rA915QAs085294; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 18:05:26 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 18:05:26 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Adam Vande More Subject: Re: Confirmation Of Drive Failure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <8f6c8132c42415d4dc955e24403beeb3@dweimer.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="3512871622-864023621-1383959126=:84892" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 08 Nov 2013 18:05:26 -0700 (MST) Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 01:06:44 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --3512871622-864023621-1383959126=:84892 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Fri, 8 Nov 2013, Adam Vande More wrote: > On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Warren Block wrote: > On Fri, 8 Nov 2013, Adam Vande More wrote: > > Also regarding ada0, dangerously dedicated mode is not supported 8.x+ > > > AFAIK, it would still work, it's just not recommended.  The installer memory stick images still use it, even on 10.0. > > > It was removed in 8.0R.  The memstick image must be built in a flaky way, but it doesn't actually use the 'a' device to mount. Could you point me to a commit or something? I'd like to see what changed. Thanks! --3512871622-864023621-1383959126=:84892-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 9 01:42:42 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE5AEC90 for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 01:42:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pd0-x22e.google.com (mail-pd0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4C012E90 for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 01:42:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pd0-f174.google.com with SMTP id z10so2859927pdj.5 for ; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 17:42:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=bE8n8uDNBFRu0zGmqdKMKB0uYT1KaP7BjXF6AjjoGCc=; b=ddyjnf6ntWwxAd3bnPaKNpZvdQSqiYh8KYXUTm360kNeY/I3zuqIJ0T6jU+uNRiJ50 tvfJJYWaNUrDK+nz1fXyr95vGgpMIf3fYf6fau7Eqqdi0O2UcolwR0pqaY4QroJ0otv1 KiE73fmte/6sGL08jR6Qqw618DwAnwyXwrRE9+/V2WL5Sz+cMmb0TrsAQYtupMIFdvPj DojiKwav/CGEToja0VA9dfxTYNBx8a8pAHuRbT9zsSU6dCz4MvOZ+RbIPjy1/06GnT4b EEtMtfdn4ARuwZlSJMD0kfqtI6YCKal3eLXAfpjqKur8z0pkABX2gCPFZkjp7QalBaHG Aing== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.67.4.197 with SMTP id cg5mr18668159pad.10.1383961362487; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 17:42:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.92.79 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 17:42:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <8f6c8132c42415d4dc955e24403beeb3@dweimer.net> Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 19:42:42 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Confirmation Of Drive Failure From: Adam Vande More To: Warren Block Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 01:42:43 -0000 On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Adam Vande More wrote: > On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Warren Block wrote: > >> On Fri, 8 Nov 2013, Adam Vande More wrote: >> >> Also regarding ada0, dangerously dedicated mode is not supported 8.x+ >>> >> >> AFAIK, it would still work, it's just not recommended. The installer >> memory stick images still use it, even on 10.0. >> > > It was removed in 8.0R. The memstick image must be built in a flaky way, > but it doesn't actually use the 'a' device to mount. > The release notes don't appear to fully describe the situation. After a little digging sysinstall support was removed in 8.0R due to incompatibilities with GEOM and DD devices won't work on that release. But the memstick doesn't mount the DD device, it mounts its base device so that's not a valid example of DD still working. I haven't seen a DD device mount post 8.0 and I haven't tried really. Do you have examples of DD devices mounting past 8.0R? It seems GEOM still recognizes these devices but that doesn't mean it's functional. http://www.freebsd.org/releases/8.0R/relnotes-detailed.html#FS There are also examples of users having to convert DD devices so that they could get it to mount. -- Adam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 9 09:25:40 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2E61D66 for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 09:25:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qe0-x229.google.com (mail-qe0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c02::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A36CD2383 for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 09:25:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qe0-f41.google.com with SMTP id x7so2946756qeu.14 for ; Sat, 09 Nov 2013 01:25:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=MtPRh9zthVwFO+5CH2cYAT/t0ZpMzog8j463F8lIoSI=; b=UgDpMxYTJZSr6SlyJ9Ua5qlLFcfurkmKwCy9nRluKnbWjq6iPOwjTQeEKhs9sz+dw1 p8UhES93xWnkGkMUOv9SQW3JskcJ0PzUWvZYCK2pU4Whyu732HREmc0nqcTI8ACAIApu JPe/lSvODs4rl4NaiCT7E63i5VzcXVCjeVz0IGP1iuPC/expAVfw+kSErCpxw3CYvEdv lhJct9xX82O1rUbJl7deW5YB3wXJmJVW0Kj0HxYXaL/rLXbRgTFLJaNtBWaUB2RxA5Tu 2qwdP/VzQyq+vFoYiIC0EWKqCEf6sSmIR2R+Ym2OPZBL128H9h5CNCXxu2s7OkO36Yel 5Xcw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.49.19.101 with SMTP id d5mr29148542qee.78.1383989139941; Sat, 09 Nov 2013 01:25:39 -0800 (PST) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.224.207.66 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 01:25:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <70EC0F10-FAD0-4EA6-8C1F-A95B1C786B7B@gmail.com> <20131031153757.GG63947@dan.emsphone.com> <4A2AEF45-5185-4ED7-98BD-B6975C79A5B9@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2013 01:25:39 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: pIXQdIFEY3Rk72ejcsFVWVKSolQ Message-ID: Subject: Re: CPU Turbo mode From: Adrian Chadd To: Warren Block Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Dan Nelson , FreeBSD Mailing List , aurfalien X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 09:25:40 -0000 On 8 November 2013 16:08, Warren Block wrote: > When it shows 2201, it's in Turbo mode. I don't know if there is anywhere > that shows the actual speed of the single core that is going faster. I enabled this on a 4-core sandy bridge (E3-1260L IIRC) and all four cores suddenly grew a few % more clock cycles. But, it was on a server whose fans are cranked high anyway, so the CPU temperature only grew a degree or two. I think Turbo Boost is boosting all cores that have work on it; it's up to the thread/process scheduler to keep the thermal envelope such that the overclocking works. -adrian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 9 09:38:10 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34ED0FCF for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 09:38:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF04B240B for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 09:38:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-117-74.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.117.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 243DF3CB69 for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 10:38:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id rA99boA7002141 for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 10:37:50 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2013 10:37:50 +0100 From: Polytropon To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Deleting files after download Message-Id: <20131109103750.1545c9ae.freebsd@edvax.de> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 09:38:10 -0000 I'm searching for a solution for the following scenario and I hope there's something already existing that I could use. Maybe someone has had a comparable requirement and can share ideas? For transfering files that do not pass e-mail entry quota, a system for file exchange has been installed. It's an "in-house solution", but should be usable via Internet as well (security!). When Alice wants to send a file to Bob, she'd run a command to upload the file, like this: $ uploadfor bob catmagazine.ps The "uploadfor" script would notify Bob about a new file waiting for him (via e-mail): Bob, there is a new file for you to download: ftp://ftp.example.com/xchg/catmagazine.ps He can now go ahead and download the file. The choice here is a CLI program because it's helpful to automate tasks (upload more than one file, scripted uploads, etc.). After the file has been downloaded, it isn't required to be on the server any more time. I'm searching for a solution that can do this either a) right _after_ the download has been completed (I know how to check this in ftpd -ll logs, but I don't want to really use FTP; also both Alice and Bob have an account and will use scp, but how can I check for successful scp transfers?) b) at a preprogrammed time (A cron job, run once an hour or every day at midnight could do that.) The side effect of a working solution a) would be that a message could be sent to Alice: Alice, Bob has downloaded xchg/catmagazine.ps at . The file has been deleted. I din't really want to use FTP for this (even though it would be trivial to implement). Using scp (or any other "FTP via SSH" client) would be more secure and therefore better. :-) It would also be nice to have the "messaging facility" on the same system that holds the files for exchange. In the above example, the "uploadfor" program would generate the "invitation", while some other program would generate the "success report". It would be cool to have the exchange server "listening" for arrival of new files (for whom, by whom, name, size) and generate the "invitation" from that data. Any ideas? Does this maybe already exist? -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 9 12:18:20 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEBFE16B for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 12:18:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Lena@lena.kiev.ua) Received: from lena.kiev.ua (lena.kiev.ua [82.146.52.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97ABA2A63 for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 12:18:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lena.kiev.ua; s=3; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=ZtJMthWT6tTFGx760oH7iD6xSAlHVjGuKElA+5mYfyE=; b=GP+oIpl/l32KY9T23bx9qhNDQtJOrj0uUP8LasWCYw+z5r2wNA3JPpFRWM5JybQh4Cvg7awJjgi8CGFfTTTDumWi4mW8RipDdxUY/296ZRK9Baj9l+XJ6EqVBgiXcVqoyBDX57dx7NmaaH7V2gSV4u6OXn1CyW8sekejYL2wg7U=; Received: from ip-384c.rusanovka-net.kiev.ua ([94.244.56.76] helo=bedside.lena.kiev.ua) by lena.kiev.ua with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Vf7UY-000Gte-Jh; Sat, 09 Nov 2013 14:18:19 +0200 Received: from bedside.lena.kiev.ua (localhost.lena.kiev.ua [127.0.0.1]) by bedside.lena.kiev.ua (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rA9CHftv044689; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 14:17:41 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from Lena@lena.kiev.ua) Received: (from lena@localhost) by bedside.lena.kiev.ua (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id rA9CHe16044688; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 14:17:40 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from Lena@lena.kiev.ua) Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2013 14:17:40 +0200 From: Lena@lena.kiev.ua To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem with Google streetview and firefox Message-ID: <20131109121740.GH794@lena.kiev> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201311081421.07558.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Mike Clarke X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 12:18:20 -0000 > From: Mike Clarke > > Google streetview worked fine with Firefox before my recent upgrade of > ports but I now have a problem. On starting > streetview I see the image but cannot pan, zoom or exit from streetview, > in fact Google maps becomes totally unresponsive > and the image window eventually goes black. I used dom.ipc.plugins.enabled.npwrapper.libflashplayer.so false (in about:config in Firefox) as a workaround for some youtube videos to play. But eventually it caused that same problem with Street View in Google Maps. So, I had to set dom.ipc.plugins.enabled.npwrapper.libflashplayer.so and dom.ipc.plugins.enabled back to default true, that helped with Street View. Surprisingly, the youtube videos which earlier gave the error message (about Flash) are played successfully now. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 9 12:31:11 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2957641 for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 12:31:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank2@fjl.co.uk) Received: from bs1.fjl.org.uk (bs1.fjl.org.uk [84.45.41.196]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D7DC2B45 for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 12:31:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.35] (host86-150-246-69.range86-150.btcentralplus.com [86.150.246.69]) (authenticated bits=0) by bs1.fjl.org.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rA9CRjeq053767 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 12:27:46 GMT (envelope-from frank2@fjl.co.uk) Message-ID: <527E2A42.4080903@fjl.co.uk> Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 12:27:46 +0000 From: Frank Leonhardt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Deleting files after download References: <20131109103750.1545c9ae.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20131109103750.1545c9ae.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 12:31:12 -0000 On 09/11/2013 09:37, Polytropon wrote: > I'm searching for a solution for the following scenario and I hope > there's something already existing that I could use. Maybe someone > has had a comparable requirement and can share ideas? > > For transfering files that do not pass e-mail entry quota, a system > for file exchange has been installed. It's an "in-house solution", > but should be usable via Internet as well (security!). > > When Alice wants to send a file to Bob, she'd run a command to > upload the file, like this: > > $ uploadfor bob catmagazine.ps > > The "uploadfor" script would notify Bob about a new file waiting > for him (via e-mail): > > Bob, > there is a new file for you to download: > ftp://ftp.example.com/xchg/catmagazine.ps > > He can now go ahead and download the file. The choice here is a > CLI program because it's helpful to automate tasks (upload more > than one file, scripted uploads, etc.). > > After the file has been downloaded, it isn't required to be on the > server any more time. I'm searching for a solution that can do this > either > > a) right _after_ the download has been completed > (I know how to check this in ftpd -ll logs, but I don't want to > really use FTP; also both Alice and Bob have an account and will > use scp, but how can I check for successful scp transfers?) > > b) at a preprogrammed time > (A cron job, run once an hour or every day at midnight could do > that.) > > The side effect of a working solution a) would be that a message > could be sent to Alice: > > Alice, > Bob has downloaded xchg/catmagazine.ps at . > The file has been deleted. > > I din't really want to use FTP for this (even though it would be > trivial to implement). Using scp (or any other "FTP via SSH" client) > would be more secure and therefore better. :-) > > It would also be nice to have the "messaging facility" on the same > system that holds the files for exchange. In the above example, > the "uploadfor" program would generate the "invitation", while some > other program would generate the "success report". It would be cool > to have the exchange server "listening" for arrival of new files > (for whom, by whom, name, size) and generate the "invitation" from > that data. > > Any ideas? Does this maybe already exist? > For what it's worth, in a similar situation I opted for an email notification that said "This file will be available for 14 days". Apart from being somewhat easier to implement, it had the advantage that the file could be downloaded by the same person on two or more hosts, more than one recipient to the original email, and it was possible to forward the link to other people who might also want the file. I used http/s for getting the files up and down as it was just easier for the users (especially cross-platform). If you've not done this before, HTTP POST and PHP are your friends. If you use PHP for upload, you can make it do anything you like on download too. PHP remains, of course, the work of Beelzebub and the fact that it's useful at times like this is simply proof of its nefariousness. Regards, Frank. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 9 12:44:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73E5C7E5 for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 12:44:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 383D02BC7 for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 12:44:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-117-74.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.117.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FE13254AE; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 13:43:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id rA9ChhHx002952; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 13:43:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2013 13:43:43 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Frank Leonhardt Subject: Re: Deleting files after download Message-Id: <20131109134343.e20a2ef0.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <527E2A42.4080903@fjl.co.uk> References: <20131109103750.1545c9ae.freebsd@edvax.de> <527E2A42.4080903@fjl.co.uk> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 12:44:02 -0000 On Sat, 09 Nov 2013 12:27:46 +0000, Frank Leonhardt wrote: > For what it's worth, in a similar situation I opted for an email > notification that said "This file will be available for 14 days". Apart > from being somewhat easier to implement, it had the advantage that the > file could be downloaded by the same person on two or more hosts, more > than one recipient to the original email, and it was possible to forward > the link to other people who might also want the file. That's a nice extension of the original idea: multiple recipients, more than one download, retention period. > I used http/s for > getting the files up and down as it was just easier for the users > (especially cross-platform). This part involves the complexity I initially wanted to avoid: A HTTP server. Of course it would be able to parse its logs, but if possible, I'd rather not run a web server for that simple thing... As I said initially, I'd like the whole construction to be as simple as possible. > If you've not done this before, HTTP POST > and PHP are your friends. If you use PHP for upload, you can make it do > anything you like on download too. PHP remains, of course, the work of > Beelzebub and the fact that it's useful at times like this is simply > proof of its nefariousness. A web server _and_ PHP - this is becoming a really devlish plan for the darkest souls among the evil programmer hordes. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 9 15:26:13 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE8856F for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 15:26:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gmx@ross.cx) Received: from www81.your-server.de (www81.your-server.de [213.133.104.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E5E223F4 for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 15:26:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [88.70.114.73] (helo=michael-think) by www81.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.74) (envelope-from ) id 1Vf9zh-0001Ui-1k; Sat, 09 Nov 2013 15:58:37 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: "Frank Leonhardt" , Polytropon Subject: Re: Deleting files after download References: <20131109103750.1545c9ae.freebsd@edvax.de> <527E2A42.4080903@fjl.co.uk> <20131109134343.e20a2ef0.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 15:58:30 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Michael Ross" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20131109134343.e20a2ef0.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.16 (Win32) X-Authenticated-Sender: gmx@ross.cx X-Virus-Scanned: Clear (ClamAV 0.97.8/18088/Sat Nov 9 12:43:01 2013) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 15:26:13 -0000 On Sat, 09 Nov 2013 13:43:43 +0100, Polytropon wrote: > On Sat, 09 Nov 2013 12:27:46 +0000, Frank Leonhardt wrote: >> For what it's worth, in a similar situation I opted for an email >> notification that said "This file will be available for 14 days". Apart >> from being somewhat easier to implement, it had the advantage that the >> file could be downloaded by the same person on two or more hosts, more >> than one recipient to the original email, and it was possible to forward >> the link to other people who might also want the file. > > That's a nice extension of the original idea: multiple recipients, > more than one download, retention period. I have really bad experiences with "delete after downloaded". - Your logs showing the file to be sent is not the same as the file being correctly received. - Users do things like download and save to the wrong place, so they delete and download again. Go with Frank's advice, use a retention period. Michael From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 9 15:30:43 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3297E5B5 for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 15:30:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from avasout07.plus.net (avasout07.plus.net [84.93.230.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E26E244B for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 15:30:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from curlew.milibyte.co.uk ([84.92.153.232]) by avasout07 with smtp id nTWZ1m001516WCc01TWaCn; Sat, 09 Nov 2013 15:30:34 +0000 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=O/UA4nNW c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=lfSX4pPLp9EkufIcToJk/A==:117 a=lfSX4pPLp9EkufIcToJk/A==:17 a=D7rCoLxHAAAA:8 a=0Bzu9jTXAAAA:8 a=mSnCZvPJBnkA:10 a=iCYF3wDok9sA:10 a=ZTb9aqGL9YkA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=mjMnZd04v4wA:10 a=PZapCBPDkOxVXO4igcMA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 Received: from curlew.lan ([192.168.1.13]) by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1VfAUX-0001fO-CC; Sat, 09 Nov 2013 15:30:32 +0000 From: Mike Clarke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2013 15:30:27 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.1-RELEASE-p7; KDE/4.10.5; amd64; ; ) References: <20131109121740.GH794@lena.kiev> In-Reply-To: <20131109121740.GH794@lena.kiev> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201311091530.27520.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.1.13 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on curlew.lan X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Subject: Re: Problem with Google streetview and firefox Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on curlew.milibyte.co.uk) Cc: Lena@lena.kiev.ua X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 15:30:43 -0000 On Saturday 09 Nov 2013 12:17:40 Lena@lena.kiev.ua wrote: > I used dom.ipc.plugins.enabled.npwrapper.libflashplayer.so false > (in about:config in Firefox) as a workaround for some youtube videos to > play. But eventually it caused that same problem with Street View in > Google Maps. So, I had to set > dom.ipc.plugins.enabled.npwrapper.libflashplayer.so and > dom.ipc.plugins.enabled back to default true, that helped with Street > View. Surprisingly, the youtube videos which earlier gave the error > message (about Flash) are played successfully now. Thanks, that seems to have fixed it. I don't have dom.ipc.plugins.enabled.npwrapper.libflashplayer.so set on my system but dom.ipc.plugins.enabled had been set to false, ISTR that I needed to do that some time ago to make youtube work. I've reset dom.ipc.plugins.enabled back to default true and streetview works OK now. Youtube still seems OK too. -- Mike Clarke From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 9 19:55:52 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4796A22 for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 19:55:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nhgson@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-x229.google.com (mail-wg0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 541FA2FA9 for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 19:55:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id n12so325547wgh.0 for ; Sat, 09 Nov 2013 11:55:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=JA1KDTLD00K1VuF1N509N973jXwuvpW46KWgo8tNts8=; b=ZcBUTBBWL0rx/eSM5dE7lreJgzZuODKCQBxBaGdgNtJLjBT8PQdTKkLpxYnx7j4/DL paMeN/bBCV/y1hT/VRjVuZEx1jGsYNzHlsl/82HVAjODQfC6r1qYsy9ItJaglrjsFiii xKAoMBmLmmAC5081gb65G7bUajxMhM11zHdlm1h/1Rc+PZCHMVaqcO3AvTSCF6RcVsWt XcKHXEZ279yU+AP4bL21+xVIzeEBRLKvCJVNaMx/oXH57ZhSet+EAL92ir5N8sEKPt1H Hh0bshabIAoiliVTWe0705ttX9ztZ6NGYjNVsdgv4sb1mSceOSODplZMjhgX4co2EA9c 4x5Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.78.99 with SMTP id a3mr7730wjx.93.1384026950661; Sat, 09 Nov 2013 11:55:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.21.208 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 11:55:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 02:55:50 +0700 Message-ID: Subject: Bootstrapping pkg the FreeBSD Jail From: Hung Son Nguyen To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 19:55:52 -0000 Hi guys, Can I bootstrap pkg without enter the Jail? Thanks, --=20 * Nguy=E1=BB=85n H=C3=B9ng S=C6=A1n* --- University of Information Technology - VNU HCMC --- Phone: (+84) 1689 975 376 --- Yahoo: nguyensonuit --- Skype: nguyensonuit From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 9 21:00:54 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF09225D for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 21:00:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from newsletter@guengel.ch) Received: from zhhdzmsp-smta16.bluewin.ch (zhhdzmsp-smta16.bluewin.ch [195.186.227.132]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7581F2304 for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 21:00:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [195.186.99.131] ([195.186.99.131:42092] helo=zhbdzmsp-smta13.bluewin.ch) by zhhdzmsp-smta16.bluewin.ch (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.47 r(39824M)) with ESMTP id 7F/20-26389-E72AE725; Sat, 09 Nov 2013 21:00:47 +0000 Received: from smtp.guengel.ch (83.77.246.251) by zhbdzmsp-smta13.bluewin.ch (8.5.142) (authenticated as rafael.ostertag) id 51DDDBBD0AE41661 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 21:00:46 +0000 Received: from gizmo.kruemel.home (gizmo.kruemel.home [IPv6:fd3e:be3e:ec34::1]) by smtp.guengel.ch (8.14.6/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rA9L0jl5025407 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 22:00:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from eeenyx.dhcp.kruemel.home (vpn-client-6.vpn.kruemel.home [192.168.102.6]) (authenticated bits=0) by gizmo.kruemel.home (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rA9L0hFE000949 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 22:00:45 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from newsletter@guengel.ch) Message-ID: <527EA27B.6060509@guengel.ch> Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 22:00:43 +0100 From: Rafael Ostertag User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: 9.2-RELAESE: IPv4/IPv6 dual stack and ipv6_prefered X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98 at starscream X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,HELO_LH_HOME autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on starscream X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 21:00:54 -0000 Hi I have following entries in /etc/rc.conf: ip6addrctl_enable="YES" ip6addrctl_policy="ipv6_prefer" on 9.1, this made FB pick IPv6 addresses for outbound connections. However on the same box, after updating to 9.2, IPv6 addresses are no longer used by default. Looking at the output of ip6addrctl on 9.2, everything seems to be in order, IMHO: # ip6addrctl Prefix Prec Label Use ::1/128 50 0 0 ::/0 40 1 3493 ::ffff:0.0.0.0/96 35 4 0 2002::/16 30 2 0 2001::/32 5 5 0 fc00::/7 3 13 3295 ::/96 1 3 0 fec0::/10 1 11 0 3ffe::/16 1 12 0 Using ssh or wget to connect to another IPv6 enabled host, reveals that IPv4 is used instead of IPv6. Any ideas what might be wrong? cheers rafi