From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Feb 4 12:11:32 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from shell.monmouth.com (shell.monmouth.com [209.191.58.1]) by builder.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E07314AE7 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2000 12:11:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from bg-tc-ppp600.monmouth.com (root@bg-tc-ppp600.monmouth.com [209.191.59.34]) by shell.monmouth.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA18141 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2000 14:54:07 -0500 (EST) Received: (from pechter@localhost) by bg-tc-ppp600.monmouth.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA06981 for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Fri, 4 Feb 2000 14:57:18 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from pechter) From: Bill Pechter Message-Id: <200002041957.OAA06981@bg-tc-ppp600.monmouth.com> Subject: JFS and IBM To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2000 14:57:18 -0500 (EST) Reply-To: bpechter@shell.monmouth.com X-Phone-Number: 732-935-0629 X-OS-Type: FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL66 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Folks, while some of us were at Linux expo talking about journaling file systems and *BSD, IBM released jfs to the GPL. Is there anyone working on this as a gpl'd add-in to *BSD? Is this as much of a surprise to all of you as to me... I thought jfs would remain a tightly held OSF/1 component that would never see "free" status. We live in interesting times, indeed. Bill ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- bpechter@monmouth.com|pechter@pechter.dyndns.org|pechter@pechter.bsdonline.org Three things never anger: First, the one who runs your DEC, The one who does Field Service and the one who signs your check. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message