Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 07 Aug 2012 13:40:46 -0500
From:      Marco Muskus <marcomuskus@une.net.co>
To:        Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o
Message-ID:  <5021612E.9070804@une.net.co>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208060110130.2396@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References:  <CAFBRBcoxr5HLVipX5L5=qhEZ7pOW+4NmWJwy3GsL_DH74Fm+yQ@mail.gmail.com> <501D8A3D.1000707@une.net.co> <20120805162915.GB5028@hemlock.hydra> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208052003030.94918@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <501EE348.9020609@une.net.co> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208060110130.2396@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
El 05/08/12 18:10, Wojciech Puchar escribió:
>>> really - stick with FreeBSD UFS. it is really best.
>>
>> Yes UFS is very good, but very hight IO ZFS is fastest if you use 
>> L2ARC/ZIL on SSD.
> if...
>
> better just move heavy used things on SSD and rest on HDD. really it's 
> fastest.
>
>
>
Yes, you can do that ... until the SSD is full



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5021612E.9070804>