Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 15:39:57 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: P?sztor Rich?rd <ricsip@mailbox.hu> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Managing bad sectors during install Message-ID: <20050217233957.GA19205@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <6.1.2.0.2.20050217230346.02725a48@mailbox.hu> References: <6.1.2.0.2.20050217230346.02725a48@mailbox.hu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 11:09:12PM +0100, P?sztor Rich?rd wrote: > I think this 8,4 quantum is old enough to not contain so called "spare=20 > sectors". So 1 bad sector means there is really only 1 bad > sector. Anyway i still cant understand, why UFS cant cope with bad blocks= ,=20 > but 1000 year old FAT, or the newer NTFS > can easyli get through the problem. There didn't seem to be a question there. > The other problem: how should i mount "/" read-only, because i always get= =20 > "busy" error-message? When you do what, exactly? Kris --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCFStMWry0BWjoQKURAgTsAKDP0VkiIBmhzs7LDohhfzGeBQQVBwCffh9k NZEFr2hx51msy2SNahQNA7Y= =4l4e -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050217233957.GA19205>