From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 3 09:27:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D71B16A4CE for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2004 09:27:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from cimbali.dssrg.curtin.edu.au (cimbali.dssrg.curtin.edu.au [134.7.165.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49F5D43D2F for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2004 09:27:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from charon@cimbali.dssrg.curtin.edu.au) Received: from cimbali.dssrg.curtin.edu.au (localhost.dssrg.curtin.edu.au [127.0.0.1])i33HQhGB048853 for ; Sun, 4 Apr 2004 01:26:43 +0800 (WST) (envelope-from charon@cimbali.dssrg.curtin.edu.au) Received: (from charon@localhost)i33HQhiK048852 for freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org; Sun, 4 Apr 2004 01:26:43 +0800 (WST) (envelope-from charon) Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2004 01:26:43 +0800 From: Charon To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040403172643.GA48831@cimbali.dssrg.curtin.edu.au> References: <20040401220702.B56A86A832@smtp4.pacifier.net> <1080972666.77366.1.camel@elemental.DashEvil> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1080972666.77366.1.camel@elemental.DashEvil> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Re: BSD Success Stories X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2004 17:27:10 -0000 On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 01:11:06AM -0500, Chris Laverdure wrote: > I really question those crazy high uptimes. They may reflect a carefull configuration choice to begin with. Also, consider the anti bsd sentiments of some Linux folk and the perception that old=unpatched and therefore unsecure. The uptimes might really be valid. The only way to be sure is to ask the admins of the site.