Date: Sat, 24 May 2003 15:07:46 +0100 From: David Taylor <davidt@yadt.co.uk> To: FreeBSD-STABLE <FreeBSD-STABLE@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: issue with ports Message-ID: <20030524140746.GA22742@gattaca.yadt.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20030524000056.GJ383@hal9000.halplant.com> References: <00af01c320e0$271fe270$426f2a40@boondocks> <20030523065702.GD383@hal9000.halplant.com> <20030523214236.GA64636@moo.holy.cow> <20030524000056.GJ383@hal9000.halplant.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 23 May 2003, Andrew J Caines wrote: > > make index already takes care of INDEX, unfortunately, instead of keeping > > around the old copy unless index making succeeds. > > I've never seen "make index" fail, so I doubt this is significant. I'm all > in favour of preserving data for recovery in case of failure, but in this > case wouldn't a filed "make index" imply that INDEX is/was inaccurate? I've never seen "make index" _succeed_ on my computer, since I started running it. I think I've probably got something stale lying around somewhere, but I can't seem to find what it is. -- David Taylor davidt@yadt.co.uk "The future just ain't what it used to be"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030524140746.GA22742>