Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 01:23:37 +0200 From: Roelof Osinga <roelof@nisser.com> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Szilveszter Adam <sziszi@petra.hos.u-szeged.hu>, stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 4.0 CD, crypto and SSH Message-ID: <394EAB79.AD4C8BB7@nisser.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0006191511380.57961-100000@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kris Kennaway wrote: > > ... > Perhaps it should say "its RSA implementation" rather than leaving the > posessiveness implied. I'll revisit it.. Won't bother filling out a PR then. On the same topic I also filed http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=19387 for the same reason. That an RSA lib is needed is made abundantly clear, so that port can and will be found. Thus why not add a simple line saying where 'the other one' is? Roelof -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Eboa (ingenieursburo Office Automation) web. http://eboa.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?394EAB79.AD4C8BB7>