From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 2 22:36:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 952C916A4CE for ; Sun, 2 May 2004 22:36:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gamera.svk.isite.net (mail.isite.net [205.217.158.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75F2243D46 for ; Sun, 2 May 2004 22:36:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jrhett@isite.net) Received: from anubis.svk.isite.net (anubis.svk.isite.net [205.217.158.5]) by gamera.svk.isite.net (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i435aBqa025585 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 2 May 2004 22:36:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from anubis.svk.isite.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i435aB0G024646; Sun, 2 May 2004 22:36:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from jrhett@localhost)i435aBm8024645; Sun, 2 May 2004 22:36:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 2 May 2004 22:36:11 -0700 From: Joe Rhett To: Dick Davies Message-ID: <20040503053611.GB23559@isite.net> Mail-Followup-To: Dick Davies , Marty Landman , FreeBSD Questions References: <200404262126.36157.mikkel@talkactive.net> <200404291058.44766.mikkel@talkactive.net> <409109D6.2090504@circlesquared.com> <200404291406.58150.mikkel@talkactive.net> <6.0.0.22.0.20040429101444.0e68a6a0@pop.face2interface.com> <20040429143036.GC21785@lb.tenfour> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040429143036.GC21785@lb.tenfour> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Organization: Isite Services, Inc. cc: Marty Landman cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Suexec with Apache 1.3.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 05:36:16 -0000 On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 03:30:36PM +0100, Dick Davies wrote: > suexec is a pig to configure, complex and poorly documented. I think that's > at least partly why the world runs away from CGI and towards stuff like > JSP/PHP.... Which you need to run as CGIs if you need them to run as different userids for each site... so your comment about avoiding CGIs to avoid suexec doesn't really follow. -- Joe Rhett Chief Geek JRhett@Isite.Net Isite Services, Inc.