Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 3 Sep 2003 13:24:57 -0700
From:      Darren Pilgrim <dmp@bitfreak.org>
To:        Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>
Cc:        freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Ugly Huge BSD Monster
Message-ID:  <20030903132457.3602c35e.dmp@bitfreak.org>
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20030903131429.03609c60@localhost>
References:  <4.3.2.7.2.20030902180402.028e2380@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20030901143026.029afce0@localhost> <1062427379.15322.12.camel@suzy.unbreakable.homeunix.org> <29508631.20030901165843@mail.ru> <1062427379.15322.12.camel@suzy.unbreakable.homeunix.org> <4.3.2.7.2.20030901143026.029afce0@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20030902180402.028e2380@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20030903131429.03609c60@localhost>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2003.09.03 13:19:39 -0600, Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> wrote:

> So, you're suggesting that FreeBSD users put up with
> incompatibilities, glitches, and an unethical licensing regime merely
> because they can get something that KINDA works today? This is very
> shortsighted. Why not just go with Windows? It has all of the same
> attributes.

You've said that KDE is only partially function under FreeBSD more than
once now.  Would you please elaborate on this?  I use FreeBSD+KDE as my
desktop and, short of a more complete Windows emulator, I haven't found
anything I could do in Windows or Linux that I can't do in FreeBSD+KDE.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030903132457.3602c35e.dmp>