From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 2 17:18:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55DFB16A412 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 17:18:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from mail.stovebolt.com (webmail.stovebolt.com [66.221.101.249]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4971643D53 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 17:18:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from [192.168.2.102] (adsl-66-140-62-19.dsl.rcsntx.swbell.net [66.140.62.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.stovebolt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC17C11433C for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 12:20:17 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 12:18:25 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <3BEAF0F1D46BA2D0F96627B8@paul-schmehls-powerbook59.local> In-Reply-To: <20061002093631.36ccb9e9.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> References: <451D62A0.7010603@edpausa.com> <20060929143103.1868de7a.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <20061002093631.36ccb9e9.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.5 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; boundary="==========283DE1683810FDF3AEE5==========" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: dell poweregde 2900/2950 and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 17:18:29 -0000 --==========283DE1683810FDF3AEE5========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --On October 2, 2006 9:36:31 AM -0400 Bill Moran=20 wrote: >> >> Bill, if those are the Broadcomm Extreme NICs (bce), you need to grab >> the new version of the if_bce.c file. It fixed the problems that I >> had with the NICs. There's a char inside the file that defines the >> version - you need 0.9.6. You've got 0.9.5, I'll bet. > > Nope: > char bce_driver_version[] =3D "v0.9.6"; Well, that's disappointing. I guess we need to hope for version 0.9.7 to=20 come out soon. I haven't noticed similar problems on my 1950 though. Wonder what the=20 difference is? Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ --==========283DE1683810FDF3AEE5==========--