From owner-freebsd-advocacy  Sun Feb 28 22:40:34 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
Received: from pike.cdrom.com (pike.cdrom.com [204.216.28.222])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2165D1520C
	for <freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 22:40:00 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from rab@pike.cdrom.com)
Received: from pike.cdrom.com (localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1])
	by pike.cdrom.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA28915;
	Sun, 28 Feb 1999 22:40:16 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199903010640.WAA28915@pike.cdrom.com>
To: Harold Gutch <logix@foobar.franken.de>
Cc: freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG, rab@pike.cdrom.com
Subject: Re: The Linux PR firestorm disaster (w.r.t. FreeBSD) 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 01 Mar 1999 04:04:25 +0100."
             <19990301040425.B19859@foobar.franken.de> 
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 22:40:12 -0800
From: "Robert A. Bruce" <rab@pike.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Harold Gutch <logix@foobar.franken.de> said...
>
>> 5.  Linux has a lot more native commercial applications.
>> 
>Which run faster under FreeBSD's Linux-emulation :).

Which applications run faster on FreeBSD?  How much faster?
Where is this published or how is it replicated?

	-bob



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message