Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 8 Oct 2000 22:50:26 -0700
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@citusc.usc.edu>
To:        Doug Barton <DougB@gorean.org>
Cc:        Jordan Hubbard <jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com>, Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com>, Warner Losh <imp@village.org>, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <jruigrok@via-net-works.nl>
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/etc inetd.conf
Message-ID:  <20001008225026.D39735@citusc17.usc.edu>
In-Reply-To: <39E15B3C.80560313@gorean.org>; from DougB@gorean.org on Sun, Oct 08, 2000 at 10:44:28PM -0700
References:  <521.971068411@winston.osd.bsdi.com> <39E15630.7B4A8FE6@gorean.org> <20001008223626.B39735@citusc17.usc.edu> <39E15B3C.80560313@gorean.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Oct 08, 2000 at 10:44:28PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > 
> > On Sun, Oct 08, 2000 at 10:22:56PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> > 
> > >       ERrr... the argument that telnet should be available from inetd because
> > > a worker might be coming to a job with the wrong tools isn't valid. A
> > > better argument to allow telnet is that sshd requires some
> > > configuration, and telnet doesn't.
> > 
> > Nope, sshd doesn't require any configuration to be usable and useful
> > out of the box.
> 
> 	Currently the necessary configuration happens behind the scenes, hidden
> behind the rc* magic. (Not that I'm arguing that this is a bad thing,
> necessarily.) But sshd does need some configuration before it is
> runnable. 

I don't understand what you're saying. When a box is installed, and
rebooted for the first time, both telnetd and sshd emerge in a usable
state with no other intervention required.

Kris


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001008225026.D39735>