From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Mar 15 11:30:28 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3B12276299 for ; Sun, 15 Mar 2020 11:30:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sniffer@dewberryfields.co.uk) Received: from ictmail.ictprovision.com (ictmail.ictprovision.com [35.178.134.240]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48gHKt1twsz3K0n for ; Sun, 15 Mar 2020 11:30:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sniffer@dewberryfields.co.uk) Subject: Re: Centralized user/group/whatever management To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20200313091923.GA98495@admin.sibptus.ru> <20200313143130.GA68871@geeks.org> <96ed1afa-e0e1-51a2-997b-e95097a1d0b4@gmx.net> <20200314060747.GH27346@admin.sibptus.ru> <20200315061714.GC64075@admin.sibptus.ru> <84ee1925-e5f2-2048-7a65-1ac3b41d7d4e@dewberryfields.co.uk> From: Michael Howard Message-ID: <762e3d05-b3c2-a449-3827-ad4c860f52e4@dewberryfields.co.uk> Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 11:30:22 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <84ee1925-e5f2-2048-7a65-1ac3b41d7d4e@dewberryfields.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-GB ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dewberryfields.co.uk; s=2019; t=1584271860; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ptYFGv2eR0QYHqBhtR86GkwTyR5sA51chDkvhBEJCck=; b=QeyCJm+vWsrr+DWAP5tDejLscZjrhOUeMh+6gI/Cgsidv/IFmdm5P+1O52IKtHaPGDcbAQ SaykXYQSenvERL9VW1NusqvciYr9/kvg0tJre3JPxAQ9yIvEbTTAEJN4WFp9g2rOCP/MBN FgkwSUGRNqgKymEfs3f8oL1ZFVVpWVM= ARC-Seal: i=1; s=2019; d=dewberryfields.co.uk; t=1584271860; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=VTV/clHkdLSEHA7ebBCCHBL/gQFVf/nrZpHZBO62ttijiS4kqF4A/LqgggXOIFzyiuVYcs 11KpdyWdCVEmhNAIcaqzXd/j082hI5eZCuUNhnqp9EOn7wMvZvxP2n8rI1HzfCVGLIfQYx WU5r+2uCbzzC0nixRG/yKw9QlV9l8jA= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; ORIGINATING; auth=pass smtp.auth=sniffer@dewberryfields.co.uk smtp.mailfrom=sniffer@dewberryfields.co.uk X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48gHKt1twsz3K0n X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.06 / 15.00]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[dewberryfields.co.uk:s=2019]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:ictmail.ictprovision.com]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.16)[0.157,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[dewberryfields.co.uk:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[dewberryfields.co.uk,reject]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; IP_SCORE(-0.22)[asn: 16509(-1.04), country: US(-0.05)]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16509, ipnet:35.178.0.0/15, country:US]; ARC_ALLOW(-1.00)[i=1]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 11:30:28 -0000 On 15/03/2020 08:30, Michael Howard via freebsd-questions wrote: > On 15/03/2020 06:17, Victor Sudakov wrote: >> Michael Howard via freebsd-questions wrote: >>>>>>> Do you think there exists a modern solution for centralized >>>>>>> user/group/... >>>>>>> management compatible with FreeBSD and Linux? >>>>>> What do you mean by "Samba" in this context? A centralized >>>>>> user/group >> management server? A centralized user/group management client? >> > Both of course. One without the other is not much use in your context. > > You still leave yourself at the mercy of one of your original issues > with NIS and that is you need the server available over the network. I > doubt you'll find any system _without_ drawbacks but Samba is good and > free. It can be managed through a MS gui, albeit from a MS Windows > based PC and has a very large user base. Sorry, didn't make that clear. The AD aspect can be managed .........