Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 21:09:24 +0100 From: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The vim port needs a refresh Message-ID: <20130527210924.36432f32@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <51A3A813.1060908@marino.st> References: <20130524212318.B967FE6739@smtp.hushmail.com> <20130527140609.3d3b9d23@gumby.homeunix.com> <444ndofstn.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <20130527153440.020ab20e@gumby.homeunix.com> <51A3798C.9000004@marino.st> <20130527173633.0e196a08@gumby.homeunix.com> <51A38D87.8070102@marino.st> <20130527183620.5ff9d8b0@gumby.homeunix.com> <51A3A813.1060908@marino.st>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 27 May 2013 20:38:11 +0200 John Marino wrote: > >> It's obviously true since multiple users are seeing it. (the whole > >> 1080 movie analogy, remember?) > > > > It not obviously true that you aren't all either making this problem > > with your make.conf settings or referring to a problem that existed > > last year. > > It was THIS year and it wasn't that long ago. January in the worst > case. But now you're explicitly telling multiple users that they > didn't in fact experience this? No, that's something you just made up. It is however vague and anecdotal. We have only one data point that we know is from this year and not self-inflicted, even if the others are, for all we know it could still be fast most of the time. Some monitoring would be useful.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130527210924.36432f32>