Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 13:53:18 -0500 From: Marco Muskus <marcomuskus@une.net.co> To: "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o Message-ID: <5021641E.4030206@une.net.co> In-Reply-To: <793d6519ca3648de7634faff1829b9f7@remailer.privacy.at> References: <793d6519ca3648de7634faff1829b9f7@remailer.privacy.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
El 05/08/12 20:05, Anonymous Remailer (austria) escribió: >>>> I think that XFS & JFS are more mature filesystems than ZFS > This is not up for discussion. > >> but the feature set of ZFS i ahead in the future. > Too many iPads, iPhones, etc? > >> For a NFS server first I'll go with ZFS because the consistence in disk > If not spelling, or grammar... > >> and speed will gonna be the differentiator. > A high-school education may well have been the differentiator, but that's > not important right now. Journaling filesystems are not known for speed. > EXT2 will probably outperform ZFS as far as NFS servers go. English is not my native language, so i can make mistakes. ZFS is the way to go if you need consistency + speed on a NFS server/service. > > -- > Speed "Will" Gonna > Be The Differentiator > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5021641E.4030206>