Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 07 Aug 2012 13:53:18 -0500
From:      Marco Muskus <marcomuskus@une.net.co>
To:        "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at>,  freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o
Message-ID:  <5021641E.4030206@une.net.co>
In-Reply-To: <793d6519ca3648de7634faff1829b9f7@remailer.privacy.at>
References:  <793d6519ca3648de7634faff1829b9f7@remailer.privacy.at>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
El 05/08/12 20:05, Anonymous Remailer (austria) escribió:
>>>> I think that XFS & JFS are more mature filesystems than ZFS
> This is not up for discussion.
>
>> but the feature set of ZFS i ahead in the future.
> Too many iPads, iPhones, etc?
>
>> For a NFS server first I'll go with ZFS because the consistence in disk
> If not spelling, or grammar...
>
>> and speed will gonna be the differentiator.
> A high-school education may well have been the differentiator, but that's
> not important right now. Journaling filesystems are not known for speed.
> EXT2 will probably outperform ZFS as far as NFS servers go.

English is not my native language, so i can make mistakes. ZFS is the 
way to go if you need consistency + speed on a NFS server/service.

>
> --
> Speed "Will" Gonna
> Be The Differentiator
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5021641E.4030206>