Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 09:46:59 -0500 (EST) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: in_pcbbind_setup(), etc. Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1040325094617.53816A-100000@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <20040325143256.GA8930@darkness.comp.waw.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > +> How does this sound? It would completely eliminate the issue of "er, > +> which thread is that", which is really an unnecessary issue given that all > +> we're interested in is the credential. > > Sounds good. I can prepare patch with this in p4, but it isn't to heavy > change from network locking branches point of view? If anything, it's a simplifying change, since it corrects a potential locking/synchronization nit, and it should be easy to merge. Please go ahead! Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects robert@fledge.watson.org Senior Research Scientist, McAfee Research
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.96L.1040325094617.53816A-100000>