Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 10:57:39 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> To: freebsd-database@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD database performance via JDBC Message-ID: <f19jqa$b5u$1@sea.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <4635B9B4.3060905@nagafix.co.uk> References: <4635B9B4.3060905@nagafix.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig3E6B4C449266F2F7FB48A6B2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Antoine Martin wrote: > I published this paper a few weeks ago that some of you might find > interesting (see part2: FreeBSD vs Linux vs Solaris): > http://devloop.org.uk/documentation/database-performance/ > I have to admit I have been a Linux user for many years and I was > expecting it to come out on top, and if anything I expected Solaris to > do better - after all the tests are written in Java. All my predictions= > turned out wrong! > Feel free to forward to [advocacy], re-use the graphs, etc. Can you try it again with libthr threading library=20 (http://threads.seas.gwu.edu/cgi-bin/man2web?program=3Dlibmap.conf§io= n=3D5)?=20 There's intent to make libthr the default for 7.0 and it may perform=20 worse in exactly this kind of benchmarks. --------------enig3E6B4C449266F2F7FB48A6B2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGOFKKldnAQVacBcgRAv2KAKCDA142ny8i5/LrZPbCETB5VU/UCQCgr+t8 7Oj5uF7s/obHrNtGb9SGmD4= =/dDp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig3E6B4C449266F2F7FB48A6B2--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?f19jqa$b5u$1>