From owner-freebsd-current Mon Feb 12 17:39: 8 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B70B37B503 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:38:59 -0800 (PST) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id CAA92622; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 02:38:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Peter Wemm Cc: Warner Losh , Daniel Eischen , John Indra , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is bad for me...) References: <200102130127.f1D1RKU56334@mobile.wemm.org> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 13 Feb 2001 02:38:53 +0100 In-Reply-To: Peter Wemm's message of "Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:27:20 -0800" Message-ID: Lines: 12 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Peter Wemm writes: > at which point any stdio using dynamic binary is hosed, including the > *USELESS* copies in /tmp that installworld stashed away. Is it possible to produce a static executable from a dynamic one, provided the right libs are available? In that case, the initial "grab copies of the binaries we need" phase in the installworld target could be changed to "grab staticized copies of the binaries we need". DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message