From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 19 19:40:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E9D3106564A; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 19:40:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D564E8FC17; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 19:40:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iadj38 with SMTP id j38so7373561iad.13 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 11:40:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=kKFdzOtJbEeOehux9NJBcI/HVIfwfodE2OdSsEqPYro=; b=mXu9F/MD1qQ6gJVjg7/VWkfRgveNfokoSNCV1eOcWfS6lDxQxDlVRyldu91Nn0pURO +pQi129q0K8bJKTxG3xiDg+GlM/gsiUt5QM8hjl220A7V5vyiI+9WXS0GRSsOuTeXyRE R9UExLADgGOPhltWh3JCQIoCdyXRZjYadq2As= Received: by 10.50.192.197 with SMTP id hi5mr28723328igc.16.1324323650272; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 11:40:50 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.231.199.18 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 11:40:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <201112181751.pBIHpivv027591@repoman.freebsd.org> <4EEF0AF1.20501@FreeBSD.org> From: Chris Rees Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 19:40:19 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4f-r3LHICIKAZhGLGjz2EDVe0qc Message-ID: To: Doug Barton Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/sysutils/xfce4-utils Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 19:40:51 -0000 On 19 December 2011 10:03, Chris Rees wrote: > > On 19 Dec 2011 09:59, "Doug Barton" wrote: >> >> Thanks, that's 1/3 of the job done. :) =A0The problem is that the curren= t >> OPTION creates the false idea that the only way you can lock your screen >> is to use xlockmore. >> >> Perhaps you missed my followup where I mentioned that the next step >> would be to add an OPTION for xscreensaver as well, and the logic to >> avoid having them both defined. OK, before I commit another patch.... Are you sure it's necessary to avoid having both defined? It won't break anything to have both enabled, and they're both disabled by default... Chris