From owner-freebsd-bugs  Tue Mar 30  1:40:14 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.9])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E12F150E6
	for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 30 Mar 1999 01:40:10 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from bde@godzilla.zeta.org.au)
Received: (from bde@localhost)
	by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.8.7/8.8.7) id TAA07113;
	Tue, 30 Mar 1999 19:39:50 +1000
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 19:39:50 +1000
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199903300939.TAA07113@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: bde@zeta.org.au, shalunov@att.com
Subject: Re: kern/10545: When a fork/exec stress test is run, the machine locks up
Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

>> The kernel virtual address space increase may hide the bug.  You should
>> get the full proc table message or hit some other resource limit in a
>> controlled way in all configurations.
>
>Increase of kernel virtual address space in what config?  (I don't
>follow the development too closely; Was something changed in 4.0?  Or
>you mean my high maxusers value?)

In 4.0.  I was just pointing out why testing under 4.0 may be misleading.

Bruce


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message