From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 28 17:34:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C6E3106566C; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 17:34:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F07268FC14; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 17:34:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.3/8.14.1) with ESMTP id oBSHUUQ3057062; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 10:30:30 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Message-ID: <4D1A1EB6.5040009@bsdimp.com> Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 10:30:30 -0700 From: Warner Losh User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101029 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Colin Percival References: <201012272352.oBRNqeEb040247@svn.freebsd.org> <20101228015905.GA81514@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <4D194551.7000004@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4D194551.7000004@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Steve Kargl Subject: Re: svn commit: r216746 - head/sys/conf X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 17:34:08 -0000 On 12/27/2010 19:02, Colin Percival wrote: > On 12/27/10 17:59, Steve Kargl wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 11:52:40PM +0000, Colin Percival wrote: >>> Make it possible to specify WITHOUT_MODULES in a kernel config file. >> Can you explain how this differs from >> makeoptions NO_MODULES >> which has been able to do for years? > NO_MODULES means what it says: No modules. > > WITHOUT_MODULES="foo bar baz" means "go ahead and build modules except for foo, > bar, and baz". Most of the other uses of the WITHOUT_xxx in the tree means omit feature xxx entirely... I usually hate to nit-pick names, but in this case I think "OMIT_MODULES" would be a better name and less confusing for the other uses of WITHOUT_FOO in the tree... Warner