Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 04 Feb 2014 17:37:55 +0000
From:      Vincent Hoffman <vince@unsane.co.uk>
To:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Massive ports update?
Message-ID:  <52F12573.8020309@unsane.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <52F12391.6060101@riseup.net>
References:  <52F081AF.8030402@riseup.net> <52F08713.3080206@delphij.net> <52F0A889.7090803@freebsd.org> <52F12391.6060101@riseup.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 04/02/2014 17:29, Nikola Pavlović wrote:
> On 04/02/14 09:44, Colin Percival wrote:
>> On 02/03/14 22:22, Xin Li wrote:
>>> On 2/3/14, 9:59 PM, Nikola Pavlović wrote:
>>>> Was there a *huge* update to ports tree tonight between around
00:20 and
>>>> 06:30 CET?  Portsnap just fetched 24720 patches (this is more or less
>>>> every port I guess), but I can't find anything in
>>>> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/ that would correspond to
this. I'm
>>>> a bit worried. :)
>>>
>>> This may be related to my upgrade operation on the portsnap builder,
which
>>> happened around UTC midnight, right after a new "snap" snapshot is
taken.
>>
>> I'm pretty sure this resulted from changes to libarchive / bsdtar.  With
>> them generating different tarballs for the same input, the portsnap build
>> thinks that everything has changed.
>>
>> ... there's actually code on the portsnap builder to revert such changes,
>> but I don't think delphij knew about it and I didn't realize he was
>> upgrading the portsnap builder until too late.
>>
>
> I see, thanks.  This sounds like mystery solved, but I can't be the only
> one who's seen this, so just to be sure---has anyone else had the same
> thing happen?  (Unfortunately, I don't have another FreeBSD machine at
> hand, unrelated to the one from the first post, to check.)
>
I had a huge list when I updated at approx 6am GMT.
I did initially wonder why there wasn't much to update considering this
but the explanation seems reasonable enough to me.

Vince
>
>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJS8SVzAAoJEF4mgOY1fXowgdwP/0co37MQQQc1Fx94EIBi7g6a
ss/kOHxwisgvZwe3SN9Y3c5RYvqDhqvD+JdOD0C8rS73w+zi5D6FoGYvMf3IfZ91
FlkKihOcJjVpWlZLBbRtTGXgIBRNYIPnia8egs0aTKV+kQZGbzj5UwmvKvqRN7Dp
E3hWuMo4w5RrfFyrKep2Eq5IniWbyLoS7snTUug0cDTOP023H/hAsWV5GQMyPfZ1
jz5yD2EvqAUf1vlsESgVeO9wW8mAUA85iBRw1K48sQugsCG2M0cZ6/mxUKMoTdXj
AhNzn4M08gnG0x5EVpEABNPSY6/LUWWsPBYmcT7HENNz0g5xa2yg3FFcJREd/v5d
bNsBPhFQ96hExojT2f9DsRKnpxHbPQqLlAOD5uxkKtQ0byCBlfj2lN0NM1IrCiif
Xe/k+9U2YwWNnwSseF9OIE6pO6Pwt+IkXFn/XHnUGMVZBylTGIeJGUc1jvB7qbb4
pzX+gatjz4U1EYmIH1/bvgl5JUR/ly6aV0KV5odGaZsbVt8OIA/KKJjLp89F3X4F
5L/PvqwOVGC2ndWNB0erdzMgQ2pVw3Cvyycf+xwG0v8tv/Sq8ZQbtwopDCia+aaw
LaygbEAYHJY7ppXydE9G12Gc7kpvYFQrvtAeWE0E+G786ESIzyeZyAJsZ4uvy8mt
YGSrXZwtfRv1R5tCXXRS
=Zz3r
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?52F12573.8020309>