From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 2 17:21:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C78B216A494 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 17:21:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from mail.stovebolt.com (webmail.stovebolt.com [66.221.101.249]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34A6743D92 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 17:20:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from [192.168.2.102] (adsl-66-140-62-19.dsl.rcsntx.swbell.net [66.140.62.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.stovebolt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF2C7114333 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 12:22:22 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 12:20:30 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <8E65B51FBB70DCE0DAB8103C@paul-schmehls-powerbook59.local> In-Reply-To: <20061002122936.32d93517.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> References: <451D62A0.7010603@edpausa.com> <20060929143103.1868de7a.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <20061002122936.32d93517.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.5 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; boundary="==========40B8736A8DBC6C3918E0==========" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: dell poweregde 2900/2950 and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 17:21:02 -0000 --==========40B8736A8DBC6C3918E0========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --On October 2, 2006 12:29:36 PM -0400 Bill Moran=20 wrote: > > Note that I just ran a buildworld over NFS with no problems, so it > seems as if all issues have been resolved in the 0.9.6 version. > > Must have had something else going on during last week's tests. Glad to hear that. You had me worried. Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ --==========40B8736A8DBC6C3918E0==========--