From owner-freebsd-www Tue Dec 17 11:11:10 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id LAA12415 for www-outgoing; Tue, 17 Dec 1996 11:11:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.crl.com (mail.crl.com [165.113.1.22]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id LAA12409 for ; Tue, 17 Dec 1996 11:11:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from pillar.elsevier.co.uk by mail.crl.com with SMTP id AA22612 (5.65c/IDA-1.5 for ); Tue, 17 Dec 1996 11:11:14 -0800 Received: from snowdon.elsevier.co.uk (snowdon.elsevier.co.uk [193.131.197.164]) by pillar.elsevier.co.uk (8.8.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id TAA04957 for ; Tue, 17 Dec 1996 19:01:08 GMT Received: from cadair.elsevier.co.uk by snowdon.elsevier.co.uk with SMTP (PP); Tue, 17 Dec 1996 19:01:13 +0000 Received: from tees.elsevier.co.uk (tees.elsevier.co.uk [193.131.197.60]) by cadair.elsevier.co.uk (8.8.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id TAA12192; Tue, 17 Dec 1996 19:01:03 GMT Received: (from dpr@localhost) by tees.elsevier.co.uk (8.8.3/8.8.3) id SAA01114; Tue, 17 Dec 1996 18:59:43 GMT To: Ade Barkah Cc: jfieber@indiana.edu (John Fieber), www@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: moving cvs References: <199612170544.WAA05972@hemi.com> From: Paul Richards Date: 17 Dec 1996 18:59:41 +0000 In-Reply-To: Ade Barkah's message of Mon, 16 Dec 1996 22:44:30 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <5720cp2e02.fsf@tees.elsevier.co.uk> Lines: 32 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.3/Emacs 19.30 Sender: owner-freebsd-www@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Ade Barkah writes: > > I just thought of one problem with moving the www cvs archive to > > spatter. Substantial chunks (the handbook and FAQ) come from the > > FreeBSD source tree, not the www tree. ... > > If most of the cgis, archives, etc., will be left on freefall > anyway, can we simply... > > 1) Leave freefall as it is > 2) Have spatter just mirror freefall's docs via rsync > 3) Assign www.freebsd.org to spatter > > That way spatter still takes most of the hits, and we're > spared the headache of figuring out which documents/cgis > need to be moved where using what. > > Of course, some of the links need to be updated as you've > mentioned (e.g. search.html should point to freefall, not > to "www"), and there's a question whether the other mirrors > should rsync to spatter (probably) or freefall. If all we're talking about doing is moving the static html pages off freefall onto spatter then the sensible solution is a proxy on spatter. What sort of load do we think just moving the static pages will save? -- Paul Richards. Originative Solutions Ltd. (Netcraft Ltd. contractor) Elsevier Science TIS online journal project. Email: p.richards@elsevier.co.uk Phone: 0370 462071 (Mobile), +44 (0)1865 843155