From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon May 5 19:08:08 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA06376 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 5 May 1997 19:08:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from awfulhak.demon.co.uk (awfulhak.demon.co.uk [158.152.17.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA06368 for ; Mon, 5 May 1997 19:08:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from awfulhak.demon.co.uk (localhost.lan.awfulhak.org [127.0.0.1]) by awfulhak.demon.co.uk (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id DAA03226; Tue, 6 May 1997 03:08:00 +0100 (BST) Message-Id: <199705060208.DAA03226@awfulhak.demon.co.uk> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96 To: Brian Somers cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, brian@utell.co.uk Subject: Re: LQR in ppp In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 06 May 1997 02:41:57 BST." <199705060141.CAA02158@awfulhak.demon.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 06 May 1997 03:08:00 +0100 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Can anyone still make the client side LQR stuff fail ? I used ^ 'M' that is :O > to be able to reproduce it with my ISP, but now I can't get it > to fail with ppp (-current) <=> ppp (2.2) or with ppp (-current) > to my ISP. I've waited 'till my side has sent 0x117 and received > 0x10e, so there's no "total diff is 5" type error AFAIK. > > I'm pretty sure that nobody specifically fixed it.... maybe I'm > wrong (ache - you've been in the code a bit, don't be shy). > > Lot's of stuff hasn't been put back into 2.2 (yet), so I'd appreciate > testing on -current if possible -- please. > > TIA. > > -- > Brian , > > Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour.... > >