From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Apr 1 15:54:26 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA14890 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 1 Apr 1997 15:54:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from softway95.softway.com (softway95.softway.com [206.80.1.38]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA14885; Tue, 1 Apr 1997 15:54:22 -0800 (PST) Received: (from renaud@localhost) by softway95.softway.com (8.8.5/8.6.12) id PAA15669; Tue, 1 Apr 1997 15:28:14 -0800 (PST) From: Renaud Waldura Message-Id: <199704012328.PAA15669@softway95.softway.com> Subject: Apache lingering_close error To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 1 Apr 1997 15:28:14 -0800 (PST) Reply-To: Renaud Waldura Organization: Softway, Inc. (San Francisco) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I'm using Apache 1.2b7. With the proxy module, I got lots of errors: [Fri Mar 28 22:42:11 1997] shutdown: Invalid argument [Fri Mar 28 22:42:11 1997] - lingering_close until I added EXTRA_CFLAGS=-DUSE_SO_LINGER -DNO_LINGCLOSE in the Configuration file. It works fine now, although the documentation http://www.apache.org/docs/misc/fin_wait_2.html makes me wonder if this was the Right Thing To Do. It says that FreeBSD 2.1 implements correctly the FIN_WAIT_2 timeout, but does this mean that SO_LINGER is ok too? -- -- Renaud Waldura -- -- Softway International, Inc -- -- rw@softway.com -- -- 185 Berry Street, Suite 5514 -- -- San Francisco, CA 94107 -- -- USA -- -- Tel (415) 896-0708 -- Fax (415) 896-0709 -- http://www.softway.com/ -- --