Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 18:05:34 +0200 From: Alexander Yerenkow <yerenkow@gmail.com> To: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: explicit use of /etc/rc.d vs service Message-ID: <CAPJF9w=OJNoR6%2BjxzZBUv4YR-9auhSSrXTR0Udzi6TVRpeWkyQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxgnJPFevO7W%2BypBZdcL7deB%2B_cQHF0AEcVaWWv8FFhcNcQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAF6rxgnJPFevO7W%2BypBZdcL7deB%2B_cQHF0AEcVaWWv8FFhcNcQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2013/1/23 Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> > Would anyone object to a patch which converts uses of > "/etc/rc.d/daemon start" to "service daemon start" and the like? > I would like to see service(1) become the standard interface to using > services. > What it will do if there is both /etc/rc.d/A and /usr/local/etc/rc.d/A ? > > -- > Eitan Adler > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-doc@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-doc-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Regards, Alexander Yerenkow
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPJF9w=OJNoR6%2BjxzZBUv4YR-9auhSSrXTR0Udzi6TVRpeWkyQ>