Date: 11 Dec 2000 11:21:54 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> Cc: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@cup.hp.com>, obrien@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: linprocfs placement... Message-ID: <xzpelzfxnp9.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Peter Wemm's message of "Mon, 11 Dec 2000 01:32:33 -0800" References: <200012110932.eBB9WXK25578@mobile.wemm.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> writes: > Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > No, because it would need to move again once it's no longer MD. If it > > has to move, move it to sys/compat. > Actually, sys/fs/ would be better.. sys/miscfs, in that case, which is where it started out. But I don't agree, as linprocfs is for Linux compatibility only. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpelzfxnp9.fsf>