From owner-freebsd-current Fri Nov 8 12:49:04 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id MAA07508 for current-outgoing; Fri, 8 Nov 1996 12:49:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from critter.tfs.com ([140.145.230.177]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA07502; Fri, 8 Nov 1996 12:48:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from critter.tfs.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.tfs.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) with ESMTP id WAA05491; Wed, 6 Nov 1996 22:14:39 +0100 (MET) To: Mark Mayo cc: Julian Elischer , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: please test -currents kernel In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 06 Nov 1996 17:20:11 EST." Date: Wed, 06 Nov 1996 22:14:38 +0100 Message-ID: <5489.847314878@critter.tfs.com> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In message , Mark M > >Huh? I thought if I wanted to help in the preparation for the 2.2 release, >that the RELENG_2_2 branch was exactly what I needed... On that note, I >CVSupped the RELENG_2_2 branch last night, and it seems quite solid so >far. My only problem had to do with xdm not starting up by default because >it wanted libgnumalloc.so.2.0, which I just ln -s'ed to >libfakegnumallow.so.2.0 and everything seems great so far! > >Are the changes you are talking about eventually going to make into the >RELENG_2_2 branch? I'm especially interested in the SCSI code, and the >ncrcontrol stuff seeing I have a 53c810 NCR controller.. We are considering the changes that went into -current after the RELENG_2_2 branch was made, and thus want input on -current, to decide if it is fit. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.