From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 9 21:55:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 929951065676 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2010 21:55:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ianf@clue.co.za) Received: from inbound01.jnb1.gp-online.net (inbound01.jnb1.gp-online.net [41.161.16.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C4138FC13 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2010 21:55:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [41.154.88.19] (helo=clue.co.za) by inbound01.jnb1.gp-online.net with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Np7Ol-0008Ud-Hb; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 23:55:31 +0200 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=clue.co.za) by clue.co.za with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Np7Ok-000Gpl-FE; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 23:55:30 +0200 To: pyunyh@gmail.com From: Ian FREISLICH In-Reply-To: <20100309204927.GN1311@michelle.cdnetworks.com> References: <20100309204927.GN1311@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <20100305215539.GG14818@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <20100305210435.GF14818@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <20100305184046.GD14818@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <20100305175639.GB14818@michelle.cdnetworks.com> X-Attribution: BOFH Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 23:55:30 +0200 Message-Id: Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dev.bce.X.com_no_buffers increasing and packet loss X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 21:55:35 -0000 Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 03:31:55PM +0200, Ian FREISLICH wrote: > > Can you explain the tunables please - I'm guessing it's these: I think I asked the wrong question. What is a "Quick BD Chain"? What relation should this number have to traffic rate. Is there a maximum and what are reasonable numbers for setting this to? I set the RX as high as 512 in 64 quanta but it made little difference to the interrupt rate. At times where we experience the packet loss and com_no_buffers increases, the interrupt rate on between 1 and 3 of the 4 bce interfaces fell from about 3200/s to 130/s. We're wondering if the switches we're using could be causing this problem - they're Dell PowerConnect 5448. I've seen complaints of random packet loss caused by these switches on the Internet. We have some new H3C 5100 series switches which we're planning on swapping for the Dells tomorrow to see if it makes a difference. Ian -- Ian Freislich