From owner-freebsd-chat Fri Feb 9 17:50:14 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mta5.snfc21.pbi.net (mta5.snfc21.pbi.net [206.13.28.241]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B602C37B401; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 17:49:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from xor.obsecurity.org ([63.207.60.67]) by mta5.snfc21.pbi.net (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.2000.01.05.12.18.p9) with ESMTP id <0G8I008R0PBADC@mta5.snfc21.pbi.net>; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 17:26:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by xor.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 61BE666B62; Fri, 09 Feb 2001 17:28:42 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2001 17:28:42 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: your mail In-reply-to: <20010209162718.A21618@antioffline.com>; from sil@antioffline.com on Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 04:27:18PM -0800 To: sil@antioffline.com Cc: Richard Wilson , freebsd-chat@freebsd.org, freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org Message-id: <20010209172842.A79838@mollari.cthul.hu> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6" Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i References: <20010209162718.A21618@antioffline.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 04:27:18PM -0800, sil@antioffline.com wrote: > Can't we all just get along. First off the advisories we're jokes I made > with friends and I never sent them out, or did I? Wouldn't make a difference > anyways so here's my take. Wow, you guys certainly know how to write good material. Have you considered stand-up? > things I install on my network. So the answer is yes, no here is one for > you, would you trust your network with an OS that has had more advisories > than crappier OS' (Windows) for the year? So, you feel happier with the same insecure ports existing in your OpenBSD ports collection, because they DON'T announce the vulnerabilities? We're doing both communities a service here, bud. The overwhelming majority of advisories we issue don't relate to the default installation of FreeBSD, and it is an act of sheer ignorance (or malice) to associate ports advisories with insecurity of FreeBSD. Kris --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6hJlJWry0BWjoQKURAhOsAKD6PayR1c4kBtO+8ZH/rOmh8sJ5EACghvYI qLFXSykTOdIFUPSlbZ+8J9A= =4w5L -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message