Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 12:02:24 -0400 From: Joe Altman <fj@panix.com> To: Joshua Tinnin <krinklyfig@spymac.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Post Install Configuration Issues (ruby18 error) Message-ID: <20040913160224.GA4899@panix.com> In-Reply-To: <200409122316.51822.krinklyfig@spymac.com> References: <5878D00B313A8D4E8D00B7E3082FC693067A1B@FF01.marsik.org> <413CA85B.9080500@makeworld.com> <200409122316.51822.krinklyfig@spymac.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Sep 12, 2004 at 11:16:51PM -0700, Joshua Tinnin wrote: > On Monday 06 September 2004 11:11 am, Chris <racerx@makeworld.com> > wrote: > > > Another way: - this changes the default database (btriev) to hash > > > > setenv PORTS_DBDRIVER bdb1_hash > > > > then run your portdb -u > > In fact, I opted for this one. I now run my ports tree updating > > scripts as I did BEFORE these issues. > > What sort of effect might this have elsewhere? I'm sure this fix works, > but is there something else that could get borked by changing the > default database? I used this on a box w/ multiple failures of ruby; I have since noticed no issues. The only difference is that I used this: ENV['PORTS_DBDRIVER'] = 'dbm_hash' from: http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=638936+0+current/freebsd-ports -- One million points of light shining on the new world-order model for fascism and tyranny. Get in line.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040913160224.GA4899>