From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Dec 7 23:08:41 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8D109B9CDB for ; Mon, 7 Dec 2015 23:08:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patrickhess@gmx.net) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BB05121E for ; Mon, 7 Dec 2015 23:08:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patrickhess@gmx.net) Received: from desk8.phess.net ([95.88.166.205]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MIu7d-1a8Ynv2fYv-002VHb for ; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 00:08:38 +0100 From: Patrick Hess To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Synchronizing directory hierarchies via SFTP Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 00:08:37 +0100 Message-ID: <3931169.O6iNsM7Ae5@desk8.phess.net> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.3 (FreeBSD/10.1-RELEASE-p24; KDE/4.14.3; i386; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <13761006.QDN0LtKzYl@desk8.phess.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:0suUfgHFleInu8fwcDXUDyRQZx+nJA+mJwOa9ioWLSQWPTTIPQ3 gMUhz11H5tufN92W2S+tA8yWA3AbP9qu2sYhQ8S8YJpStlQde7iMJ6HE08GSVeLDkmEh/WN x9MEnQAt1wl9jvNbM721nIxMzPqHU2gzhe7paJHUokwb3R7fbhQIDegNMq3g9SIzXnCOPoo +Bn9GQpeLw5S+OGsfQCJg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:PqlOZgf3P24=:2/7WzOlvc/ayYtMRj+fejq IZODAmdRDIP/KaLxXls4WYRy51v0MrkGCx47qsf9Tw/Jgo6y9AUGotzCU3X+eUagVWhEtowLl OWLILgBRgc9YLTzB4DIZQj3TzNiCkY4Ej9v3/d0vilGnh/BSx3V4LYLloGSf8vTBTBAeJ6ESN rGQkAPUC8g95hnhBXgADPMM2KN1fXnWq56QXvglkkxYLzDyhWVKe4HnPa+qR9H6o2Yn/JpDVh 1icQKyL4zvvCCLNjpIUW6RErkulN3ZBJvpDu2gbzyPobKuEyaYAVRMgZn+XIPmhfhPNrimSJI ikKeBVVvDqyg8MM8pco+O+ZsfT1Eu+ndMMAp2D/G04Mgwu0vQlF1wnlj+oeyKE5RHpcfQOVWT wkKLmw/VK50VSuKBWNaBn8rBd2FcBVSzKgLnkF0b6ljB6VTpP/AOcbCR57OnAjNvGmfWeOx2H p1P9YNaMYdXOXPmYmqfbKi9lDIjJeHdWALN1ga5Pz+CFXMIi9FCPTOO3LpcISRm9KCJqFQp9K II0SmtF1iU5gBbE5gklVH+S/AoblOxWY8BpooICX3YVfFH/IflnWex4m/iHsqovbPKyUvOHfF 52ym0QXubp9ZatLpzmoQgSQsWnmywMe9eEismMJHjvkrqA+P8Iv3Ibs5GXQ5ppJZSzzSsjzdM w9O3+ueIFEcUvr+438d/jY2tUn/vkGC+rw94DS6qqcSciyR2ZQ4RHBfpIA6iCQlE9bXMaLVa3 8KN60wSEUjjTkfppHCRr2SaJ0WVOHooKTkmF76fTgkhEj26XD5+GLL/tx8MoquuS82+p92sKA I1Vh8D2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2015 23:08:41 -0000 Terje Elde wrote: > You could mount the sftp locally (sshfs, fuse?), and then use rsync as if with two local dirs? Thanks, that's definitely an interesting option that didn't come to my mind. > (If that will be efficient depends a lot on your workload) Based on my previous experience with FUSE a couple of years ago, I'm actually more concerned about the reliability of this solution. In my case I'm looking at some 1800 files, for a total of 3.4 GB, of which about 300 MB will change weekly. Is this a workload FUSE could be trusted with nowadays or am I likely to run into issues in the long term? Patrick