Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 07 Aug 2012 13:54:22 -0500
From:      Marco Muskus <marcomuskus@une.net.co>
To:        Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
Cc:        centos@centos.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o
Message-ID:  <5021645E.9020900@une.net.co>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208060110570.2396@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References:  <CAFBRBcoxr5HLVipX5L5=qhEZ7pOW+4NmWJwy3GsL_DH74Fm+yQ@mail.gmail.com> <501D8A3D.1000707@une.net.co> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208051321170.21508@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <501EE212.3090403@une.net.co> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208060110570.2396@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
El 05/08/12 18:13, Wojciech Puchar escribió:
>>>> with ZFS because the consistence in disk and speed will gonna be 
>>>> the differentiator.
>>> true. it is consistently slow.
>>>
>>> REALLY from what tale do you people get such a statements.
>>
>> There is no tale, only a feature set:
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zfs#Features
>>
>
> And everything everyone writes is always true.
>
Did you read the foot notes ? the subsequent links ?

Regards,



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5021645E.9020900>