From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 28 17:34:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BCE51065673; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 17:34:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 199178FC08; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 17:34:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.3/8.14.1) with ESMTP id oBSHV8LC057063; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 10:31:08 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Message-ID: <4D1A1EDC.8010603@bsdimp.com> Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 10:31:08 -0700 From: Warner Losh User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101029 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steve Kargl References: <201012272352.oBRNqeEb040247@svn.freebsd.org> <20101228015905.GA81514@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <4D194551.7000004@freebsd.org> <20101228020900.GA81611@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <20101228020900.GA81611@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Colin Percival Subject: Re: svn commit: r216746 - head/sys/conf X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 17:34:10 -0000 On 12/27/2010 19:09, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 06:02:57PM -0800, Colin Percival wrote: >> On 12/27/10 17:59, Steve Kargl wrote: >>> On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 11:52:40PM +0000, Colin Percival wrote: >>>> Make it possible to specify WITHOUT_MODULES in a kernel config file. >>> Can you explain how this differs from >>> makeoptions NO_MODULES >>> which has been able to do for years? >> NO_MODULES means what it says: No modules. >> >> WITHOUT_MODULES="foo bar baz" means "go ahead and build modules except for foo, >> bar, and baz". >> > Thanks. The distincion wasn't clear from the commit log. > I read it as "Build a kernel WITHOUT building MODULES", > which is what NO_MODULES does. which is why I'd like to have its name changed: it is confusing this way... Warner