Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:35:54 +0000
From:      Mark Blackman <mark@exonetric.com>
To:        Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc:        FreeBSD <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: posix compliance
Message-ID:  <92468E79-ED9B-4C05-B891-875FA0B65C0E@exonetric.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120228113213.GA56638@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk>
References:  <20120228091746.GA48977@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <4F4CB09B.7010806@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120228110323.GA56536@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20120228062537.31ac74c0@scorpio> <20120228113213.GA56638@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help

On 28 Feb 2012, at 11:32, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> 
> sorry to be a pain.
> 
> Are we talking 10%, 50%, 90% complete?


Depending on how you weight the various items of POSIX compliance,
a finger-in-the-air guess would be around 90%, but I think only
the -hackers list can give you a good answer.

It's probably instructive to compare to various other OSes level
of compliance as well (for your presentation).

- Mark



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?92468E79-ED9B-4C05-B891-875FA0B65C0E>