From owner-freebsd-current Tue Jul 11 10:39:38 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from wall.polstra.com (rtrwan160.accessone.com [206.213.115.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD5D137B582 for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 10:39:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Received: from vashon.polstra.com (vashon.polstra.com [206.213.73.13]) by wall.polstra.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA12374; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 10:39:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) From: John Polstra Received: (from jdp@localhost) by vashon.polstra.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id KAA53177; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 10:39:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 10:39:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200007111739.KAA53177@vashon.polstra.com> To: Alexander@Leidinger.net Subject: Re: Perl 5.6.0 & pod2man & ports In-Reply-To: <200007111040.MAA01457@Magelan.Leidinger.net> References: <200007111040.MAA01457@Magelan.Leidinger.net> Organization: Polstra & Co., Seattle, WA Cc: current@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In article <200007111040.MAA01457@Magelan.Leidinger.net>, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > On 10 Jul, Will Andrews wrote: > > >> Only if ports-base isn't anymore in ports-all or my local CVS tree is > > > > ports-base was/has never [been] in ports-all, for some strange reason. > > Really? [...] > I read this as: If you didn't use "ports-all", you have to use > "ports-base". If you use "ports-all", "ports-base" is already included. You are correct. The ports-all collection includes ports-base, and that has always been the case. John -- John Polstra jdp@polstra.com John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence." -- Chögyam Trungpa To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message