From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 13 15:43:53 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2116A16A4B3 for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 15:43:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thuis.piwebs.com (217-19-20-186.dsl.cambrium.nl [217.19.20.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A166843FB1 for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 15:43:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from avleeuwen@piwebs.com) Received: (qmail 64900 invoked by uid 85); 13 Oct 2003 22:44:40 -0000 Received: from avleeuwen@piwebs.com by thuis.piwebs.com by uid 82 with qmail-scanner-1.20rc1 (uvscan: v4.2.40/v4288. Clear:RC:1:. Processed in 0.065682 secs); 13 Oct 2003 22:44:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO 192.168.0.109) (192.168.0.109) by 0 with SMTP; 13 Oct 2003 22:44:39 -0000 From: Arjan van Leeuwen To: Jeff Roberson Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 00:43:49 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <20031013152650.N56213-100000@mail.chesapeake.net> In-Reply-To: <20031013152650.N56213-100000@mail.chesapeake.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200310140043.49108.avleeuwen@piwebs.com> cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ULE status; interactivity fixed? nice uninvestigated, HTT broken X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 22:43:53 -0000 On Monday 13 October 2003 21:27, Jeff Roberson wrote: > On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Arjan van Leeuwen wrote: > > On Sunday 12 October 2003 23:21, Jeff Roberson wrote: > > > I commited a fix that would have caused all of the jerky behaviors > > > under some load. I was not able to reproduce this problem with kde > > > running afterwards. > > > > Thanks for the fix! However, the problem is still here for me (using rev. > > 1.58). I just noticed it when compiling Mozilla. I can also still see it > > when logging out of GNOME. > > Is it somewhat better? I specifically fixed the problem for Giant but > other locks could have the same issues. I suspect that they are far less > frequently held without Giant, but I could be wrong. Now that I looked at it better, yes, it does indeed seem better :). It still seems to happen at the same places, but the jerkiness is less... jerky. the position of the mouse pointer is updated more often than used to be the case. Arjan