Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 11:03:49 -0800 From: Joshua Lokken <joshua@twobirds.us> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kernel configuration Message-ID: <20040326190349.GB1948@cs025_2k> In-Reply-To: <20040326183919.GB27638@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <B36C365832C90E47A37F4FFCDDEFC46D3D5FF7@hkisrv08.tw.fi> <20040326183919.GB27638@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> [2004-03-26 10:56]: > On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 08:20:42PM +0200, Toni Heinonen wrote: > > > > I didn't give options NFSCLIENT or NFSSERVER yet it seems to have compiled support. What gives? > > What you don't compile into your kernel (by eg. 'options NFSCLIENT') > will generally be compiled as a loadable module instead -- here > nfsclient.ko I've wondered about this -- is that the significance of the NO_MODULES parameter in make.conf? IOW, if one was to specify no_modules, would that build only the kernel modules that were specified in the conf? -- Joshua Those who hate and fight must stop themselves -- otherwise it is not stopped. -- Spock, "Day of the Dove", stardate unknown
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040326190349.GB1948>