From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 26 01:27:17 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EA5DE30; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 01:27:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ns.kevlo.org (220-135-115-6.HINET-IP.hinet.net [220.135.115.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "ns.kevlo.org", Issuer "ns.kevlo.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35780265E; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 01:27:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ns.kevlo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns.kevlo.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sBQ1Q1Zn019017 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 26 Dec 2014 09:26:01 +0800 (CST) (envelope-from kevlo@ns.kevlo.org) Received: (from kevlo@localhost) by ns.kevlo.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id sBQ1Q0tc019016; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 09:26:00 +0800 (CST) (envelope-from kevlo) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2014 09:25:59 +0800 From: Kevin Lo To: Mark Linimon Subject: Re: svn commit: r375390 - in head/net/ifstated: . files Message-ID: <20141226012559.GA19009@ns.kevlo.org> References: <201412240559.sBO5xXKA011201@svn.freebsd.org> <20141224125108.GA20688@FreeBSD.org> <20141225011917.GA11472@ns.kevlo.org> <20141225020127.GA21260@lonesome.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141225020127.GA21260@lonesome.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, Alexey Dokuchaev , svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2014 01:27:17 -0000 On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 08:01:27PM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 09:19:17AM +0800, Kevin Lo wrote: > > > > -PORTEPOCH= 2 > > > > +PORTEPOCH= 3 > > > > > > Pardon me?? > > > > Kevin > > Uh, you've just sent PORTEPOCH backwards, which means that anyone who > built from the port during the time it was set to 3 will never get any > updates at all. > > I agree it shouldn't have been incremented in the first place, but > aren't we stuck with it now? I put PORTEPOCH back to 3, thanks. > mcl Kevin