Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 09:39:18 -0500 From: "Gary Gatten" <Ggatten@waddell.com> To: <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: libthr vs lipbthreads Message-ID: <70C0964126D66F458E688618E1CD008A0793EE07@WADPEXV0.waddell.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0905291615270.11866@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20090529074443.167820@gmx.net> <20090529140626.60670@gmx.net> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0905291615270.11866@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Is there any sort of consensus on the better choice between these two libraries? I'm running an app (nTop) on 6.0 RELEASE and have sometimes "odd" behavior and performances issues with libpthreads. I recently switched the libthr, but I'm not sure if the issues are the app code itself, or the way FBSD does threads and scheduling. Apparently these issues are isolated to FBSD and Linux, Solaris, etc. work fine? Also thought about using Linux threads, but too much hassle compared to creating libmap.conf and restarting. Any thoughts, insights, etc. would be great. Found some resources on the web that indicated libthr is the way to go, but... still not sure? <font size=3D"1"> <div style=3D'border:none;border-bottom:double windowtext 2.25pt;padding:0i= n 0in 1.0pt 0in'> </div> "This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and delete this email from your system." </font>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?70C0964126D66F458E688618E1CD008A0793EE07>