Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 20 Jun 2002 16:31:41 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Gordon Tetlow <gordon@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>, <arch@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: MFC of src/etc/rc.subr
Message-ID:  <Pine.LNX.4.44.0206201631040.28471-100000@smtp.gnf.org>
In-Reply-To: <3D1197E0.26BCCA08@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Doug Barton wrote:

> Terry Lambert wrote:
> > 
> > Doug Barton wrote:
> > > On Wed, 19 Jun 2002, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
> > > > I'm going to MFC src/etc/rc.subr into -STABLE probably tomorrow unless
> > > > someone has some grevious reason that it shouldn't.
> > >
> > > Personally I think it's way too premature to consider this, before we
> > > actually have things working in -current.
> > 
> > Since it won't be turned on by default, this should be a
> > non-problem.  Even if it were turned on, it should *still*
> > not be a problem, until people provide ports rc scripts in
> > the new format.
> > 
> > I think things *are* working in -current.
> 
> My concern is that people will start writing scripts that use these
> interfaces, then we're going to change them. However, if no one else
> objects, I suppose it's ok....

Actually, I think this is a good reason. I'm going to think on it some 
more. I have some ideas I need to flesh out and probably talk with lukem 
about.

-gordon


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.44.0206201631040.28471-100000>